Green growth’s false premises and alternative policy proposals
Published:
Apr 20, 2024
Updated:
2024-04-20
Versions:
2024-04-20 (2)
Keywords:
Degrowth policies, green growth, decoupling, sustainability, OECD, European Green Deal
Abstract
Green growth recognizes the pressing environmental
problems that are threatening the planet,
but holds an optimistic view on the relation
between economic growth and environmental
protection. It presumes that the economy can
continue to grow as long as it is geared toward
finding new investment opportunities in innovations
and technological developments that
will lead to the greening of the economy. This
will supposedly lead to a gradual decoupling of
economic growth from resource use and environmental
impact. Scientific evidence seriously
questions the decoupling hypothesis, and theories
critical of growth have suggested alternative
policy proposals for environmental and
social sustainability. These non-mainstream
theories and analytical frameworks seem to be
earning a wider acceptance nowadays
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Trantas, N. (2024). Green growth’s false premises and alternative policy proposals. Social Cohesion and Development, 17(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.12681/scad.32226 (Original work published March 1, 2022)
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alexander, S. (2012), “The Optimal Material Threshold: Toward an Economics of Sufficiency”,
Real-World Economics Review 61: 2–21.
Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. and G. Zucman (2018), World Inequality Report
, Paris: World Inequality Lab.
Booth, D. (1995), “Economic democracy as an environmental measure”, Ecological Economics
(3): 225-236.
Bradshaw, C.J.A. et al. (2021), “Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghasty Future”,
Frontiers in Conservation Science 13 January 2021. doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419.
Carlsson, C. and F. Manning (2010), “Nowtopia: strategic exodus?”, Antipode 42(4): 924-953.
Cattaneo, C. and A. Vansintjan (2016), A Wealth of Possibilities: Alternatives to Growth,
Luxembourg: Green European Foundation.
Cosme, I., Santos, R. and D.W. O’Neil (2017), “Assessing the degrowth discourse: a review and
analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals”, Journal of Cleaner Production 149: 321-
doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.016.
D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F. and G. Kallis (2015), Degrowth. A vocabulary for a new era, Abington,
Oxon: Routledge.
Daly, H. (1991), Steady-State Economics. Second Edition with New Essays, Washington: Island
Press.
Daly, H. (2013), Top 10 policies for a steady state economy, Center for the Advancement of the
Steady State Economy. https://steadystate.org/top-10-policies-for-a-steady-state-economy/
(accessed 16 Oct. 2020).
De Vit, M. et al. (2020), The Circularity Gap Report, Circle Economy. https://assets.website-files.
com/5e185aa4d27bcf348400ed82/5e26ead616b6d1d157ff4293_20200120%20-%20
CGR%20Global%20-%20Report%20web%20single%20page%20-%20210x297mm%20
-%20compressed.pdf (assessed 29.3.2021).
Ehrenreich, B. (2021), “We’re Hurtling Toward Global Suicide. Why we must do everything
differently to ensure the planet’s survival”, The New Republic 18 March 2021. https://
newrepublic.com/article/161575/climate-change-effects-hurtling-toward-global-suicide.
European Commission (2019), The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final.
Eurostat (2020), ‘Material flows in the circular economy - circularity rate’, Eurostat Statistic
Explained (accessed 29.3.2021).
Giampietro, M. and S.O. Funtowicz (2020), “From elite folk science to the policy legend
of circular economy”, Environmental Science & Policy 109: 64-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.
envsci.2020.04.012
Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006), A postcapitalist politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gough, I. (2017), Heat, greed and human need: climate change, capitalism and sustainable
wellbeing, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Haas, W. et al. (2020), Spaceship earth’s Odyssey to a circular economy – a century old
perspective. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 163 (2020) 105076. doi.org/10.1016/j.
resconrec.2020.105076.
Haas,, W. et al. (2015), “How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows,
waste production and recycling in the EU and the world in 2005”, Journal of Industrial
Ecology 19(5): 765-777. doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12244.
Hickel, J. & G. Kallis (2020), “Is Green Growth Possible?”, New Political Economy 25(4): 469-
doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
IPCC 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global
warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission
pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate
change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Jackson, T. (2009), Prosperity without growth? The transition to a sustainable economy,
London: Sustainable Development Commission.
Kallis, G. (2011), “In defense of degrowth”, Ecological Economics 70(5): 873-880.
Kallis, G. (2013), “Societal metabolism, working hours and degrowth: a comment on Sorman
and Giampietro”, Journal of Cleaner Production 38: 94-98.
Kallis, G. (2015), Yes, We Can Prosper Without Growth: 10 Policy Proposals for the New Left,
the-new-left/.
Kallis, G., C. Kerschner and J. Martinez-Alier (2012), “The economics of degrowth”, Ecological
Economics 84: 172-180.
Kallis, G., Paulson, S., D’Alisa, G. and F. Demaria (2020), The Case for Degrowth, Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Kovacic, Z., Strand, R. and T. Völker (2019), The Circular Economy in Europe. Critical
Perspectives on Policies and Imaginaries. Abington: Routledge.
Latouche, S. (2009), Farewell to growth, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mayer, A. et al. (2019), “Measuring Progress towards a Circular Economy: A Monitoring
Framework for Economy-wide Material Loop Closing in the EU28”, Journal of Industrial
Ecology 23: 62-76. doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12809.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2021), “The circularity gap and the growth of world movements for
environmental justice”, Academia Letters, Article 334. doi.org/10.20935/AL334.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2011), Towards Green
Growth. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2017), Green Growth
Indicators 2017, Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2020), Beyond Growth:
Towards a New Economic Approach, Paris: OECD.
Parrique, T. (2019), The political economy of degrowth, Economics and Finance. Stockholms
universitet
Parrique, T. et al. (2019), Decoupling Debunked. Evidence and arguments against green
growth as a sole strategy for sustainability, European Environment Bureau EEB. https://
www.researchgate.net/publication/334453443_Decoupling_Debunked_Evidence_and_
arguments_against_green_growth_as_a_sole_strategy_for_sustainability_A_study_edited_
by_the_European_Environment_Bureau_EEB
Polimeni, J., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M. and B. Alcott (2008), The Jevons Paradox and the Myth
of Resource Efficiency Improvements, London: Earthscan.
Ravenόs, D. (2007), Basic Income. The Material Conditions of Freedom, London: Pluto Press.
Rigon, A. (2017), Degrowth politics and Policies for Degrowth. https://www.degrowth.info/
en/2017/03/degrowth-politics-and-policies-for-degrowth/
Ripple, W.J. et al. (2020), World Science Warning of a Climate Emergency, Bioscience 70(1):
-12. doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088.
Ripple, W.J. et al. (2017), “World Science Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”, Bioscience
(12): 1026-1028. doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125.
Schor, J. (2015), “Work sharing”, In D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F. and G. Kallis (2015), Degrowth. A
vocabulary for a new era. Abington, Oxon: Routledge.
Strand, R. et al. (2021), “Growth without economic growth”, Sustainability transitions briefing
no 28/2020. European Environment Agency. doi: 10.2800/492717.
Trantas, N. (2021), “Could ‘degrowth’ have the same fate as ‘sustainable development’? A
discussion on passive revolution in the Anthropocene age”, Journal of Political Ecology
(1): 224-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2362.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011), Towards a green economy: pathways
to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers,
Nairobi: UNEP.
van Parijs, P. (2004), “Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for the Twenty-First Century”,
Politics and Society 32: 7-39.
UN General Assembly Resolution (2015), Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1 (25 September).
Unti, B.J. (2017), “The Job Guarantee and Transformational Growth”, In M. Murray and M.
Forstater (eds.) Full Employment and Transformational Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan
(Pp 63-82).
Ward, J.D. et al. (2016), “Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible?”,
PLOS ONE 11(10): e0164733.
Wiedmann, T. et al. (2020), “Scientists’ warning on affluence”, Nature Communications 11,
doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y
World Bank (2012), Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to sustainable development,
Washington, DC: World Bank.
