The “intentional” benevolent self-sufficiency of the One according to Plotinus

PDF
Published: Nov 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.39533
Keywords:
One Plotinus good self-sufficiency unity simplicity perfection intention
Apostolos Kaproulias
Doctor of Philosophy, Academic Staff of the Hellenic Open University
Abstract

The hypostasis of the One in Plotinus’ ontological system involves structural and functional value and contribution. It exists within the boundaries of its “benevolent self-sufficiency”, as a mobile force of production (immanence) and, at the same time, as absolutely oriented and enclosed in itself (transcendence). It is a dual state, which is perpetually stable and, therefore, not subject to any circumstances. At the same time, however, it is also a reality which is circulated in the realm of “intention” since the One is absolutely free to choose the quality of its self-determination. In a different approach: the “intention” of the One ultimately suggests that it is from its domain that the perfect union of nature with the will, of substance with "intention", of "remaining" with "movement", draws its culmination or even its prototypes. 

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Armstrong A. H., Plotinus, Greek trans. N. Papadakis-M.koffa, Athens: Enalios, 2006.
- «The Apprehension of Divinity in the Self and Cosmos in Plotinus», The Significance of Neoplatonism, 1976, pp. 187-197.
- «Beauty and the Discovery of Divinity in the Thought of Plotinus», Plotinian and Christian Studies, XIX, 1975, pp. 155-163.
Bales E.F., «A Heideggerian Interpretation of Negative Theology in Plotinus», The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 47/2, 1983, pp. 197-208.
Bussanich J., Plotinus’ s metaphysics of the One, Cambridge: University Press, 2006.
Cohoe C.M., «Plotinus on Divine Simplicity, Ontological Independence, and Perfect Being Theology», The Philosophical Quarterly, 67/269, 2017, pp. 751–771.
Heiser J.H., «Plotinus and the Apeiron of Plato’s Parmenides», The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 55/1, 1991, pp. 53-81.
Lekkas G., «Plotinus: Towards a Ontology of Likeness (On the One and Nous)», International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13/1, 2005, pp. 53-68.
Mazur W.Z., «To Try to Bring the Divine in Us Back Up to the Divine in the All”: The Gnostic Background of Plotinus’s», Journal of Early Christian Studies, 25/4, 2017, pp. 561-580.
Mortley R., «Negative Theology and Abstraction in Plotinus», The American Journal of Philology, 94/4, 1975, pp. 363-377.
Rist J.M., «Forms of Individuals in Plotinus», Τhe Classical Quarterly, 13/2, 1963, pp. 223-231.
Trouillard J., La Mystagogie de Proclos, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1982.
Wallis R.T., Neoplatonism, London: G. Duckworth & Co. Ltd., 1995.