A Legacy of Philosophy, Science, and Myth of Hypatia of Alexandria: Synesius of Cyrene and the Construction of Her Memory


Published: Jun 6, 2025
Updated: 2025-06-06
Keywords:
Hypatia of Alexandria Neoplatonism Intellectual legacy Historical reception knowledge
Antonis D. Papaoikonomou
Abstract

Hypatia of Alexandria, a prominent philosopher, mathematician, and astronomer of late antiquity, was murdered in 415 AD in an event that has been widely debated by historians. While some accounts depict her brutal killing as an attempt to erase her influence, Hypatia has remained a significant cultural and intellectual figure throughout history. Her legacy has been shaped by various narratives, from the Enlightenment ideal of science’s struggle against religion to her portrayal as a martyr of knowledge. The study explores how Hypatia’s contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and philosophy have been overshadowed by her tragic death and how literary and historical sources, including Synesius of Cyrene’s letters, have influenced perceptions of her life. Additionally, it examines her role in the political and cultural conflicts of Alexandria, her association with Neoplatonism, and the erasure or survival of her written works. By analyzing ancient and modern interpretations, this paper highlights the evolving representation of Hypatia as both a historical figure and a symbolic construct in intellectual history.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Cameron A. & Long J., Barbarians and politics at the court of Arcadius, University of California Press, 1993.
De Marnef H. & Cauellat G. (eds.), Nicephoros Kallistos Xanthopoulos, Ecclesiasticae historiae, Paris, 2000 [1576].
Dendrinos M. & Griva A. “Neoplatonic and Gnostic Resonances in the Martyrdom of Cyprian of Athenais Eudocia”, Dia-noesis, 14, 2023, pp. 20-38. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.37767
Dzielska M., Hypatia of Alexandria, Harvard University Press, 1995.
Evieux P., Isidore de Péluse, Beauchesne, 1995.
Garzya A. (ed.), Opere di Sinesio di Cirene: Epistole, operette, inni, SAN, 1989.
Garzya A. & Roques D. (eds.), Synésios de Cyrène: Tomes II et III, correspondances, Les Belles Lettres, 2000.
Hahn D., Unter falschem Namen: Von der schwierigen Autorschaft der Frauen, Suhrkamp, 1991.
Harich-Schwarzbauer H., “Hypatia von Alexandria: Das Kleid der Philosophin”, Moderne Antike — Antike modern, Metis. Zeitschrift für historische Frauenforschung und feministische Praxis, 7/14, 1998, pp. 31-38.
Harich-Schwarzbauer H., “Erinnerungen an Hypatia von Alexandria: Zur fragmentierten Philosophinnenbiographie des Synesios von Kyrene”, in: Feichtinger B. & Wöhrle G. (eds.), Gender studies in den Altertumswissenschaften: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2002, pp. 97-108.
Hose M., “Der Bischof und die Philosophin: Inszenierung des Paares in den Briefen des Synesios an Hypatia”, in: Heitmann A. et al. (eds.), Bi-textualität: Inszenierungen des Paares: Ein Buch für Ina Schabert, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2001, pp. 323-333.
Hose M., “Synesius und seine Briefe: Versuch einer Analyse eines literarischen Entwurfs”, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, 27, 2003, pp. 125-141.
Karlsson G., Idéologie et cérémonial dans l'épistolographie byzantine, Almqvist & Wiksell, 1962.
Knorr W. R., Textual studies in ancient and medieval geometry, Birkhäuser, 1989.
Lacombrade C., Synésios de Cyrène, Hellène et Chrétien, Les Belles Lettres, 1951.
Lacombrade C., “Hypatia”, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, 16, 1994, pp. 956-967.
Mogenet J. & Tihon A. (eds.), Le "Grand Commentaire" de Théon d'Alexandrie aux tables faciles de Ptolémée: Livre I. Histoire du texte, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1985.
Nerval G. de, Les filles de feu — Les Chimeres, Gallimard, 2005 [1854].
Papaoikonomou A., “Christianity and Rationalism: Maximus the Confessor vs. Descartes”, Dia-noesis, 14, 2023, pp. 39-52. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.37768
Rougé J., “La politique de Cyrille et le meurtre d’Hypatie”, Cristianesimo nella storia: Ricerche storiche, esegetiche, teologiche, 11, 1990, pp. 485-504.