Wife Material in a Household Context as presented in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus


Published: Jun 6, 2025
Updated: 2025-06-06
Keywords:
Xenophon Oeconomicus Women in Ancient Greece Female presentation in Classical Texts Practical Philosophy
Spyros Ganas
Abstract

In this research, certain characteristics of Ischomachus’ wife are reviewed anew, as she is presented in Xenophon's Oeconomicus. Although this topic has received considerable attention in recent years, many aspects of it have been overlooked or investigated with the binoculars of a contemporary moral compass that either underestimates the innovations the text brings to gender relations or overestimates these innovations as an attempt at a fruitless assimilation of womanhood into the male norm. We will examine how certain traditional values of womankind as seen in antiquity are transmitted to the male reality and how, in an innovative way, Xenophon exploits normativity to bring about the best practical outcome that counters the dominant notion of the superiority of the male gender. At the same time, we will take a closer look at unexplored moments in the text where Xenophon indirectly criticizes sophistical teaching and challenges the old phobia that trembled before a woman with masculine elements. It will be shown that Xenophon throws out hints to the reader to address these issues by utilizing literary references.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, volume 2: the use of Pleasure. Vintage Books.
Gini, A. (1993). The Manly Intellect of His Wife: Xenophon, “Oeconomicus” Ch. 7. The Classical World, 86(6), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/4351395
Glazerbook, A. (2009). Cosmetics and Sôphrosunê: Ischomachos’ Wife in Xenophon’s Oikonomikos. The Classical World, 102(3), 233–248. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40599847
Hobden, F. (2016). Xenophon’s Oeconomicus. In M. A. Flower (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon (pp. 152–173). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kourtoglou O., Vavouras E., & Sariannidis N., “The Stoic Paradigm of Ethics as a Philosophical Tool for Objectifying the Concepts of Organizational Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance”, Conatus - Journal of Philosophy, 9 (2), 2024, pp. 119–143. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.37932
Liddell, H. G. and R. Scott (1996) A Greek– English Lexicon. 9th edn. Oxford.
Murnaghan, S. (1988) How a woman can be more like a man: the dialogue between Ischomachus and his wife in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus, Helios 15: 9–22.
Oost, S. I. (1977). Xenophon’s Attitude toward Women. The Classical World, 71(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/4348857
Pomeroy, S.B. (1994). Xenophon Oeconomicus, A Social and Historical Commentary with a new English translation. Oxford.
Scaife, R. (1995). Ritual and Persuasion in the House of Ischomachus. The Classical Journal, 90(3), 225–232.
Shero, L. R. (1932). Xenophon’s Portrait of a Young Wife. The Classical Weekly, 26(3), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/4339124
Strauss, L. (1970). Xenophon’s Socratic Discourse: An Interpretation of the “Oeconomicus” by Leo Strauss, with a new, literal translation of the “Oeconomicus” by Carnes Lord. Ithaca, NY.
Too, Y. L. (2001). The Economics of Pedagogy: Xenophon’s Wifely Didactics. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 47, 65–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44712055
Vavouras Elias, “The political and economic philosophy in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus”, Dia-noesis: A journal of philosophy, 6, 2019, pp. 85-95.
Vavouras Elias, “The political philosophy as a precondition and completion of political economy in the Ways and Means of Xenophon”, Dia-noesis: A journal of philosophy, 9, 2020, pp. 183-198.