test Oikic Exile and Maternal Hauntology|Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy

Oikic Exile and Maternal Hauntology Clytemnestra’s Chthonic Sovereignty in the Matricidal Cosmogenesis of Greek Tragedy


Published: Nov 23, 2025
Keywords:
Clytemnestra Matricidal Cosmogenesis Oikic Exile Maternal Hauntology Chthonic Sovereignty
Shobhana R. Sree
Abstract

In Greek tragedy, Clytemnestra emerges as a controversial figure whose voice articulates a suppressed cosmology struggling against erasure. As she has been read traditionally in terms of gender inversion, revenge, and political transgression, this paper re-placed Clytemnestra, under matricidal cosmogenesis, the cultural procedure in which patriarchal order assures itself by overriding maternal and chthonic action. She represents oikic exile, the estrangement of oikos itself, and maternal hauntology, spectral recovery of the lost maternally ordered. Her nets, baths, and blood language are ritualized and claim chthonic sovereignty, a sub-power based on the underworld and sacrifice as opposed to civic law. By drawing upon linguistic analyses of Agamemnon by Aeschylus and Caruth, Ricoeur, Said, Derrida, Irigaray, and Cavarero, this article identifies Clytemnestra as a paradigmatic victim of trauma, alienation, and cultural estrangement.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aeschylus (1977), Agamemnon (R. Fagles, Trans.), in The Oresteia (pp. 39–143), Penguin Classics.
Caruth, C. (1996), Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cavarero, A. (1995), In the name of the mother (S. Anderlini-D’Onofrio & Á. O’Healy, Trans.), State University of New York Press.
Çimen, Ü. (2019), Zeus’ overthrow of Cronus within the context of symbolic matri-cide. Journal of International Social Research, 12(65), 42–49, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339713162
Derrida, J. (1994), Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (P. Kamuf, Trans.), Routledge.
Divakaruni, C. B. (2008), The palace of illusions, Anchor Books.
Foley, H. P. (2001), Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton University Press.
Irigaray, L. (1985), Speculum of the other woman (G. C. Gill, Trans.), Cornell University Press.
Janssen, J. “Ethics as a Means to Power”, Dia-noesis, 15, 2024, pp. 59-80, https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.38166.
Kakoliris Gerasimos, “Jacques Derrida’s Deconstruction of Western Metaphysics: The Early Years”, Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 4, 2017, pp. 43-62.
Kitto, H. D. F. (1961), Greek tragedy: A literary study, Routledge.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting (K. Blamey & D. Pellauer, Trans.), University of Chicago Press.
Said, E. W. (2000), Reflections on exile and other essays, Harvard University Press.
Talts, K. (2019), Violent death in Aeschylus’ Agamemnon, Philotheos, 19, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.7592/methis.v11i14.3690
Tripoula, I., “The Ethics of War Leadership as Seen through Ancient Greek Poetry”, Dia-noesis, 15, 2024, pp. 123-138, https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.38177.
Vernant, J.-P. (1990). Myth and tragedy in ancient Greece (J. Lloyd, Trans.), Zone Books.
Warwick, C. (2018), Chthonic disruption in Lycophron’s Alexandra, The Classical Quarterly, 68(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838822000763
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1983), Studies in Aeschylus, Cambridge University Press.
Zeitlin, F. (1996), Playing the other: Gender and society in classical Greek literature. University of Chicago Press.