The Relation between Human and Artificial Intellect in the Light of Key Philosophical Concepts

Pdf
Published: Ιουν 11, 2026
Updated: 2026-06-11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.45782
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Artificial Generalized Intelligence (AGI) Necessity Mind Divine mind Chance
Markos Dendrinos
Ph.D., University of West Attica, Greece
Abstract

This article examines the convergences and divergences between the human mind and the AI “mind” by drawing on historical philosophical accounts of the relationship between divine and human intellect. The relation conceived between the divine as creator and the human as created may offer insight into the present and future dynamics between human creators and AI systems. Elements such as governance, causality, chance, necessity, reduction, consciousness and unconscious serve as guiding posts in this intellectual journey through the thought of Anaxagoras, Plato, Democritus, the Stoics, Descartes, Leibniz, Nietzsche, Frege, Russell, Ramanujan, Gödel, Jung, Pauli and Monod. Should a fully mechanical and self-sufficient intelligent system remain beyond reach, a central criterion for distinguishing the human mind from the AI “mind” may be found in the capacity for genuine scientific discovery. The article concludes with a discussion of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), the horizon of possibilities it opens, as well as the ethical issues and potential dangers associated with its development.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Antoniadis, C. (2025). Knowing: The Zone of Interest from a philosophical point of view. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 17(1), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.41718
Ayer, A. J. (1954). Freedom and necessity. In Philosophical essays (pp. 271–284). Macmillan.
Brown, H. I. (1979). Perception, theory, and commitment: The new philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
Davidson, D. (2001). Freedom to act. In Essays on actions and events (pp. 63–82). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246270.003.0004
De Harven, V. (2016). Necessity, possibility, and determinism in Stoic thought. In A. Rini, E. Mares, & M. Cresswell (Eds.), Logical modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The story of necessity (pp. 70–79). Cambridge University Press.
Dendrinos, M. (2024). Integrated dialectic in Plato’s Parmenides: : a comparative analysis of Proclus’ and Ficino’s Commentaries on Parmenides. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 16, 189–208. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.39539
Descartes, R. (1969). A discourse on method; Meditations and principles (J. Veitch, Trans.). Everyman's Library. (Original work published 1637)
Johnson, M. R. (2009). Spontaneity, Democritean causality and freedom. Elenchos: Rivista di studi sul pensiero antico, 30(1).
Jung, C. G. (1945). The psychology of the transference. In Collected works (Vol. 16). Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1976). Psychological types (H. G. Baynes, Trans., Vol. 6). Princeton University Press.
Lesher, J. H. (1995). Mind’s knowledge and powers of control in Anaxagoras DK B12. Phronesis, 40(2), 125–142.
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685289532105191
Meier, C. A. (Ed.). (2001). Atom and archetype: The Pauli–Jung letters 1932–1958 (J. Donat, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Monod, J. (1972). Chance and necessity (A. Wainhouse, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Vintage.
Papadimitriou, F. (2020). Spatial complexity: Theory, mathematical methods and applications. Springer.
Papadimitriou, F. (2025). Spatial artificial intelligence. Springer.
Papaoikonomou, A. (2022). Christianity and rationalism: Maximus the Confessor vs. Descartes. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 14, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.37768
Papakonstantinou, (https://cacm.acm.org/opinion/created-computed-universe/).
Popper, K. (2012). The problem of induction. In Induction and confirmation: The nature of scientific inference. https://thehangedman.com/teaching-files/hps/popper-induction.pdf
Schofield, M. (1980). An essay on Anaxagoras. Cambridge University Press.
Sedley, D. (1988). Epicurean anti-reductionism. In J. Barnes & M. Mignucci (Eds.), Matter and metaphysics (pp. 295–327). Bibliopolis.
Seneca. (1917–1925). Moral letters to Lucilius (Epistulae morales ad Lucilium) (R. M. Gummere, Trans.). Wikisource.
Shanahan, M. (2015). The technological singularity. MIT Press.
Siegel, H. (2004). Rationality and judgment. Metaphilosophyopts, 35(5), 597–613.
Spinelli, E. (1996). On using the past in Sextus Empiricus: The case of Democritus. The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 203.
Sun, C., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., & Gupta, A. (2017). Revisiting the unreasonable effectiveness of data in the deep learning era. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (pp. 843–852). IEEE.
Taylor, C. C. W. (1998). The atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Fragments: A text and translation with a commentary. Corpus Christi College, Oxford.
Verbeken, B., Vagenende, B., Guerry, M.-A., Algaba, A., & Ginis, V. (2026). Early evidence of vibe-proving with consumer LLMs: A case study on spectral region characterization with ChatGPT-5.2 (thinking). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.18918
Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14.