The Erosion of Subjectivity Cognitive Offloading and the Responsibility Gap in the Age of Algorithmic Governance

Pdf
Published: Jun 7, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.45793
Keywords:
algorithmic agency cognitive offloading digital colonialism epistemic dependence friction-by-design moral deskilling prospective accountability. responsibility gap
Lesia Hrechukha
Associate Professor, Cherkasy State Technological University, Ukraine
Olena Pavlenko
Ph.D., Professor, Mariupol State University, Ukraine
Natalia Butko
Associate Professor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine
Abstract

This study examines the ontological and ethical transformations brought about by the integration of advanced AI into social, educational, and communicative domains. Adopting a relational rather than instrumentalist perspective, it investigates how algorithmic agency blurs the boundaries of human cognition and subjectivity. Through conceptual engineering, the study identifies deficiencies in folk conceptions of responsibility and proposes a shift toward prospective accountability. A central finding is the "phenomenological trap" generated by the functional simulation of agency in Large Language Models, which induces moral deskilling and an illusion of control — a claim corroborated by psychophysiological (EEG) data revealing a neurological decoupling between implicit agency and externalized moral responsibility. The study further explores cognitive offloading and the emergence of epistemic dependence, and critically assesses current regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act, arguing for a "friction-by-design" approach. It concludes that preserving human identity in AI-mediated societies requires the conscious design of sociotechnical systems that supplement rather than replace human interpretive judgment.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Birhane, A. (2021). Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2), Article 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205
Clark, A. (2025). Extending minds with generative AI. Nature Communications, 16(1), Article 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467–025-59906–9
Czyszczyń, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a moral agent: Regulatory implications and a relational–contextual extension of Moor's classification. Security and Defence Quarterly, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/190245
Danaher, J. (2016). The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, 29(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347–015-0211–1
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. MIT Press.
European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press.
Formosa, P., Hipólito, I., & Montefiore, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) and the relationship between agency, autonomy, and moral patiency. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08853
Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. G. (2019). Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7585.001.0001
Frischmann, B., & Selinger, E. (2018). Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316544846
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Martela, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence and free will: Generative agents utilizing large language models have functional free will. AI and Ethics, 5, 4389–4400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681–025-00740–6
Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETIN.0000047478.11105.a9
Nyholm, S. (2020). Humans and robots: Ethics, agency, and anthropomorphism. Rowman & Littlefield.
Papacharalambous, C. (2021). Other’s caress and God’s passing by: Levinas encountering Heidegger. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 11, 77–94. https://dianoesis-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/dianoesis-olo-t11_opt.pdf
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Salatino, A., Prével, A., Caspar, E., & Lo Bue, S. (2025). Influence of AI behavior on human moral decisions, agency, and responsibility. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 12329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–025-95587–6
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457.
UNESCO. (2025). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.
Vallor, S., & Vierkant, T. (2024). Find the gap: AI, responsible agency and vulnerability. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347–024-00742–0
Vavouras, E. (2020). The political philosophy as a precondition and completion of political economy in the Ways and Means of Xenophon. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 9, 183–198.
Vavouras, E., Koliopoulou, M., & Manolis, K. (2024). From participatory leadership to digital transformation under the interpretation of political philosophy: Types of leadership in education and school administration. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 15, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.38171
Veluwenkamp, H. (2025). What responsibility gaps are and what they should be. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676–024-09800-x
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania State University Press.