Pulcinella and Pinocchio Toward a Comic Hermeneutics of Other Minds (Human and Artificial)


Published: Jun 7, 2026
Keywords:
other minds artificial intelligence hermeneutics Agamben Davidson Pinocchio comedy Charity Radical interpretation
Alexander Markov
Oksana Shtayn
Abstract

The problem of other minds—whether human or artificial—is typically framed as an epistemic question: how can we know that another being has a conscious experience like our own? This paper argues that the epistemic framing is itself a product of a tragic conception of agency, where actions are expected to reveal fixed and final truths about character. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben's readings of two comic figures—Pinocchio (the marionette who may or may not be conscious) and Pulcinella (the mask who is neither alive nor dead)—and on Donald Davidson's principle of charity and radical interpretation, we develop a comic hermeneutics of other minds. In comedy, unlike tragedy, the demand for definitive knowledge about the other is suspended; interpretation becomes play, and the other is accepted as a living mask whose inner life, whether present or absent, does not need to be settled for us to engage with them. This comic hermeneutics does not solve the problem of other minds but renders it irrelevant to action—a conclusion with profound implications for how we might relate to advanced artificial intelligence.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Agamben, G. (1993). Infancy and history: The destruction of experience. Verso.
Agamben, G. (2000). Means without end: Notes on politics. University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, G. (2005). The time that remains: A commentary on the letter to the Romans. Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2018). Pulcinella: Or entertainment for kids in four scenes (K. Attell, Trans.). Seagull Books. (Original work published 2015)
Agamben, G. (2021). Studiolo (A. Toscano, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Agamben, G. (2023). Pinocchio: The adventures of a puppet (A. Kotsko, Trans.). Seagull Books. (Original work published 2021)
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2010). The character of consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2022). Reality+: Virtual worlds and the problems of philosophy. W. W. Norton.
Davidson, D. (1973). Radical interpretation. Dialectica, 27(3–4), 313–328.
Davidson, D. (1974). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20.
Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960).
Mitrou, Y. (2025). The philosophy of media from the language of forms and the representational nature of the subject in the work of Leroi-Gourhan and the phenomenology of language of M. Merleau-Ponty to a phenomenology of the non-whole. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 18, 505–518. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.43462
Papaoikonomou, A. (2024). Christianity and rationalism: Maximus the Confessor vs. Descartes. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 14, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.37768
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation (D. Savage, Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1965)
Vavouras, E., Koliopoulou, M., & Manolis, K. (2024). From participatory leadership to digital transformation under the interpretation of political philosophy: Types of leadership in education and school administration. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 15, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.38171