Didactics of Human in AI Form


Published: Sep 18, 2026
Keywords:
Didactic Human Artificial Intelligence Risk Functionality Thinking Symbiotism
Basil Osayin Daudu
Salaudin Usman
Abstract

Technological applications, innovations, and advancements characterize modern society. More interestingly, the use of technology in the 21st century has brought about rapid change to human existence and essence. Many countries, especially the developed countries, have invested so much in technology and are reaping its benefits; however, other countries are gradually following suit. So, to speak, artificial intelligence is a brand of advanced technology, but its impact on society has become a matter of concern in terms of safety and risk. Thus, this paper adopts a didactic philosophical method to ascertain the moral status of AI irrespective of its varied forms over the ages. The paper, therefore, considers AI as a human companion to better society, if need be, alongside upholding the argument that functionality makes AI a morally acting agent while malfunction incapacitates its purpose, a double-edged sword determined by human actions.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abdelgawad, A., & Wagdy, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a political actor in the digital age. International Journal of Advanced Humanities Research, 5(2), 102-143.
Ali, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 199, 123076.
Aristotle. (1998). Nicomachean Ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans., rev. J. L. Ackrill & J. O. Urmson). Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. (2004). Posterior Analytics (G. R. G. Mure, Trans.). Kessinger Publishing.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623).
Bostrom, N. (1998). How long before superintelligence? International Journal of Futures Studies, 2.
Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 167-175.
Brey, P. (2001). Hubert Dreyfus: Human versus machine. In H. Achterhuis (Ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 37-63). Indiana University Press.
Clay. (2025). Artificial intelligence vs. human intelligence: AI and human intelligence compared.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Can machines create art? Philosophy & Technology, 30, 285-303.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.
Dąbrowski, A. (2023). Introduction to the issue: Artificial intelligence and transhumanism. Argument, 13(1), 6-9.
Daudu, B. O., Osimen, G. U., & Anaiye, E. B. (2024). Sustainable smart cities in African digital space. In P. Whig, P. Sharma, N. Aneja, A. A. Elngar, & N. Silva (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and machine learning for sustainable development: Innovations, challenges, and applications (pp. 100-111). CRC Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Harper and Row.
Dur-e-Shahwar, A. I., & Azam, M. K. S. (2024). Transhuman perspective of machine's (artificial intelligence) identity in Brown's Origin: A discourse analysis. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(4), 361-367.
Eggleston, B. (2012). Utilitarianism. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, 4, 452-458.
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). The world's most dangerous ideas: Transhumanism. Foreign Policy, 144, 42-43.
Gao, W. (2023). The recent trends of artificial intelligence and its indications. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 68, 135-140.
Gaur, A. (2024). AI's human-like traits and behavioral patterns.
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2024). Defining intelligence: Bridging the gap between human and artificial perspectives. Intelligence, 104, 101832.
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.
Goleca, M., Hatay, E. S., Gill, S. S., & Buyya, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI): Foundations, trends, and future directions. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 20, 100265.
Graham, E. (2002). Nietzsche gets a modem: Transhumanism and the technological sublime. Literature and Theology, 16(1), 65-80.
Guardini, R. (1939). World and person. Werkbund Wurzburg.
Honovich, O., Shaham, U., Bowman, S. R., & Levy, O. (2023). Instruction induction: From few examples to natural language task descriptions. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 1935-1952).
International AI Safety Report. (2026). Research Series Number: DSIT 2026/001. Crown, UK Government.
Irwansyah, M. V. E. (2025). Human and artificial intelligence interaction from the perspective of social construction of technology. Ekspresi dan Persepsi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 52-64.
Joosten, J. (2023). Transhumanism technology: Current examples.
Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Kenaw, S. (2008). Hubert L. Dreyfus's critique of classical AI and its rationalist assumptions. Minds & Machines, 18, 227-238.
Kirk, H. R., Gabriel, I., Summerfield, C., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2025). Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 728.
Kolomaznik, M., Petrik, V., Slama, N., & Jurik, V. (2024). The role of socio-emotional attributes in enhancing human-AI collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1369957.
Konstantinou, K., & Chorianopoulou, M. K. (2026). Agency, responsibility, and the AGI mirror: A metaethical and anthropological inquiry. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 19(1), 179-202.
Korteling, J. E. H., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A. M., Boonekamp, R. C., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021). Human versus artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 622364.
Kurzweil, R. (1990). The age of intelligent machines. MIT Press.
Lutfi, R. (2026). Epistemic Compression and Symbolic Absence: Rethinking the Human and the Political. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 19(1), 203-236.
Maritain, J. (1963). The person and the common good. Morcelliana.
McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2005). Putting "felt-life" at the centre of human-computer interaction. Cognition, Technology & Work, 7, 262-271.
McKenna, M. (2012). Conversation and responsibility. Oxford University Press.
McNamara, N., & Kirakowski, J. (2005). Defining usability: Quality of use or quality of experience? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 200-204).
McNamara, N., & Kirakowski, J. (2006). Functionality, usability, and user experience: Three areas of concern. Interactions, 26-28.
Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing.
Mohammed, K., & Shehu, A. (2023). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) challenges and future prospects of explainable AI in major fields: A case study of Nigeria. Open Journal of Physical Science, 4(1), 1-18.
Mondin, B. (1985). Philosophical anthropology: Man, an impossible project?. Theological Publications.
Morandín-Ahuerma, F. (2023). Declaración de Montreal para una IA responsable: 10 principios y 59 recomendaciones. In F. Morandín (Ed.), Principios normativos para una ética de la inteligencia artificial (pp. 28-85). Concytep.
Okoli, I. K., & Nnajiofor, O. G. (2024). The nature of consciousness in the context of artificial intelligence: Redefining human-technology relationships. UJAH, 25(1).
Poddar, A., Sahoo, S., & Ghosh, S. (2026). Understanding syllogistic reasoning in LLMs from formal and natural language perspectives. arXiv:2512.12620.
Poole, D., Mackworth, A. K., & Goebel, R. (1998). Computational intelligence: A logical approach. Oxford University Press.
Prasad, T. A. (2021). Real-world applications of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 13(3), 520-533.
Qian, Y., Siau, K. L., & Nah, F. F. (2024). Societal impacts of artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal, and governance issues. Social Impacts, 3, 100040.
Quiambao, J. E. A. (2022). Thinking ethically: The utilitarian approach in moral decision making. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 3(3), 602-604.
Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2024). Experts imagine the impact of artificial intelligence by 2040. Imagining the Digital Future Center, Elon University.
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Ryabov, I. (2012). Dialectic and didactic: Divergent paths to contemporary discourse. Studies in Literature and Language, 5(1), 16-26.
Saini, F., Sharma, T., & Madan, S. (2022). A comparative analysis of expert opinions on artificial intelligence: Evolution, applications, and its future. Advanced Journal of Graduate Research, 11(1), 10-22.
Selenko, E., Bankins, S., Shoss, M., Warburton, J., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: A functional-identity perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 272-279.
Shah, R., Irpan, A., Turner, A. M., et al. (2025). An approach to technical AGI safety and security. Technical report, Google DeepMind.
Singer, P. (1985). In defense of animals. Basil Blackwell.
Stewart, W. (2025). The human biological advantage over AI. AI & Society, 40, 2181-2190.
Stokes, P. (2007). Philosophy: The world's greatest thinkers. Arcturus.
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals. Methuen & Co.
Triantari, S., & Tzimas, G. (2026). The Limits of Algorithmic Decision-Making: Phronesis as the Measure of Leadership Judgement in Educational Administration. Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 19(1), 277-300.
Tripathi, R. L. (2024). Artificial intelligence vs. human intelligence: Are the boundaries blurring? Journal of Data Science & Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 2000156.
Truitt, B. (2023). The Creator's review: Gareth Edwards' innovative sci-fi spectacular is something special. USA TODAY.
Udayakumar, L., & Babu, V. V. S. S. (2022). Utilitarian ethical theory in modern perspective. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 9(5), 423-430.
UN. (2024). Governing AI for humanity: Final report. United Nations.
USAID Digital Strategy. (2020-2024). USAID digital strategy 2020-2024. U.S. Agency for International Development.
Winston, P. H. (1992). Artificial intelligence (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Zhang, H. (2023). Similarities, differences, and limitations of humans and AI behavior. Computer Science and Mathematics Forum, 8, 43.