Beyond quantification and computerization: The role of philosophy of technology in digital humanities research and teaching

PDF
Published: août 2, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.44728
Keywords:
Digital Humanities Philosophy of Technology Philosophy of the Digital Philosophy Education Digitality
Giannis Perperidis
Researcher, Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-7517
Abstract

This paper explores the crucial role of Philosophy in Digital Humanities arguing that beyond the technical aspects of digitization and computational representation Digital Humanities must critically engage with the philosophical dimensions of digitality. Philosophy –particularly Philosophy of Technology and Philosophy of the Digital– offers essential tools for analyzing how digital technologies (re)shape knowledge, culture, society and experience of humans. Through an examination of key Digital Humanities texts, this paper identifies the current position of Philosophy in the field, showing how it has often been limited to a supplementary role. The paper argues, then, that by incorporating philosophical inquiry drawn from Philosophy of Technology, Digital Humanities scholars can move beyond mere quantification and computerization to critically assess the ontological, ethical, epistemological and political implications of digital transformation. Thus the importance of the inclusion of a philosophical examination of the new digital ontological condition is highlighted. Without such an integration, Digital Humanities risks becoming a purely technical field, losing sight of its potential to question and shape the digital condition and humans’ experience. Ultimately, the paper advocates for a redefined Digital Humanities that embraces Philosophy of Technology as a core element, ensuring that the field remains both innovative and critically engaged with the digital age.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alfano, M. (2018). Digital Humanities for History of Philosophy: A Case Study on Nietzsche. In: lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, David Rheams (eds.). Research Methods for the Digital Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.
Beaulieu, M. C. (2014). Digital Humanities in the Classroom: Bridging the Gap between Teaching and Research. Retrieved March 17, 2025 from: https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:12207/
Berry, D. M. (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.
Borgmann, A. (1999). Holding on to reality: The nature of information at the turn of the millennium. University of Chicago Press.
Brier, S. (2012). Where's the pedagogy? The role of teaching and learning in the digital humanities. In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities (pp. 390–401). University of Minnesota Press.
Busa, R. (1980). The annals of humanities computing: The Index Thomisticus. Computers and the Humanities, 14(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403798
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). New romantic cyborgs: Romanticism, information technology, and the end of the machine. MIT Press.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Using words and things: Language and philosophy of technology. MIT Press.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). Why AI undermines democracy. Wiley.
Dobson, J. E. (2019). Critical digital humanities: The search for a methodology. University of Illinois Press.
Earhart, A. E. (2015). Traces of the old, uses of the new: The emergence of digital literary studies. University of Michigan Press.
Elliott, T., & Gillies, S. (2019). Digital humanities and the ancient world. Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, A., & Friesen, N. (2012). (Re)Inventing the internet: Critical case studies. Sense Publishers.
Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology, and the future of the academy. NYU Press.
Fitzpatrick K. (2012). ‘The Humanities, Done Digitally’, in M. K. Gold (ed.) Debates in the Digital Humanities, (pp. 12–5). Minnesota Press.
Floridi, L. (1999). Philosophy and computing: An introduction. Routledge.
Floridi, L. (2010). Information: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2023a). Ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2023b). The blue and the green: Ethics for a complex world. Wiley.
Georgopoulou, M. S., Troussas, Ch., Triperina, E., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024). Approaches to Digital Humanities Pedagogy: a systematic literature review within educational practice. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 00, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae054.
Gogora, A. (2016). Digital humanities and philosophy -A problem of digital research. World Literature Studies 8(3): 104-114.
Gold, M. K., & Klein, L. F. (2016). Debates in the digital humanities. University of Minnesota Press.
Grimes, S. M., & Feenberg, A. (2009). Rationalizing play: A critical theory of digital gaming. The Information Society, 25(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802701643
Gualeni, S. (2015). Virtual worlds as philosophical tools: How to philosophize with a digital hammer. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137521781.
Hayles, K. (1993). The materiality of informatics. Configurations, 1(1), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1993.0003
Hirsch, B. D. (Ed.). (2012). Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics. Open Book Publishers.
Hui, Y. (2016). On the existence of digital objects. University of Minnesota Press.
Ihde, D. (1998). Bodies, virtual bodies, and technology. In D. Welton (Ed.), Body and flesh: A philosophical reader (pp. 349-357). Wiley-Blackwell.
Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press.
Jones S. E. (2014). The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. Routledge.
Juul, J. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. MIT Press.
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02
Kirschenbaum, M. (2010). What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? ADE Bulletin, 150, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1632/ade.150.55
Kirkpatrick, G. (2011). Aesthetic theory and the video game. Manchester University Press.
Kirkpatrick, G. (2013). Computer games and the social imaginary. Polity Press.
Klein, Julie T. (2015). Interdisciplining Digital Humanities: Boundary Work In an Emerging Field. University of Michigan Press.
Levy, P. (1994). L’intelligence collective: Pour une anthropologie du cyberspace. La Découverte.
Levy, P. (1995). Qu'est-ce que le virtuel? La Découverte.
Levy, P. (2013). The nature of information. In P. Levy, The semantic sphere 1: Computation, cognition and information economy (pp. 23-45). Wiley.
Liu, A. (2012). The state of the digital humanities: A report and a critique. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(1-2), 8-41.
McGann, J. (2001). Radiant textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mills, T. E. (2020). Building a Pedagogical Relationship between Philosophy and Digital Humanities through a Creative Arts Paradigm, Teaching Philosophy 43(4). DOI: 10.5840/teachphil20201123130.
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.
Perperidis, G. (2024). Designing Ethical A.I. Under the Current Socio-Economic Milieu: Philosophical, Political and Economic Challenges of Ethics by Design for A.I.. Philosophy & Technology 37(84). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00766-4.
Risam, R. (2018). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.
Rockwell, G., & Sinclair, S. (2016). Hermeneutica: Computer-assisted interpretation in the humanities. MIT Press.
Rodrigues A., Correia N. M. R. (2021). ‘Using Technology in Digital Humanities for Learning and Knowledge Dissemination’, Revista EducaOnline, 15: 27–44.
Sahle, P. (2013). DH studieren! Auf dem Weg zum einen Kern- und Referenzkurs für Digital Humanities. DARIAH-DE Working Papers No. 1. GOEDOC.
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (2008). A companion to digital humanities. Blackwell.
Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. MIT Press.
Dyer-Witheford, N., & de Peuter, G. (2009). Games of empire: Global capitalism and video games. University of Minnesota Press.