Plagiarism: initial research findings in undergraduate students


Published: Jun 1, 2019
Keywords:
Plagiarism Understanding plagiarism Information Literacy Higher Education Statistical analysis
Dionysis Kokkinos
Alexandros Koulouris
Abstract

Purpose - This paper presents and discusses the main results of a small-scale research concerning students’ and academic staff’s perceptions about plagiarism and its implications. The research was conducted in 2018, at the Department of Archival, Library & Information Studies, University of West Attica, with the use of two separate on-line questionnaires.
Design/methodology/approach – The questionnaires, consisted of open and closed-ended questions, were sent respectively to the undergraduate students and to the academic staff of the Department. As a result, 62 questionnaires were completed by the students (~10% of the whole population) and 9 by the academic staff, which was the total number of the faculty members at the time of the study.
Findings - The findings demonstrate that the students’ and the academic staff’s comprehension and perception of the term plagiarism, as well as their attitude towards the disciplinary implications, that this phenomenon entails, make it an imperative for academic realm and especially for libraries to deal with it actively and proactively.
Originality/value – Useful findings were made regarding the perception and the comprehension of plagiarism phenomenon for undergraduate students.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
References
Stern, L. (2007). What every student should know about avoiding plagiarism, New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Plagiarism.org (2017). What is plagiarism? http://www.plagiarism.org Dionysis Kokkinos, Alexandros Koulouris Journal of Integrated Information Management - Vol 04, No 01 23
Akbar, A. (2018). “Defining Plagiarism: A Literature Review”, Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 5(1), pp. 31-38. https://doi.org/10.30605/ethicallingua.v5i1.750
Liddell, J. (2003). “A Comprehensive definition of plagiarism”, Community & Junior College Libraries, 11 (3), pp. 43-52.
Wan Zah, W.A., Habsah, I. & Tan Tien C. (2012). “Plagiarism: to what extent it is understood?”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, pp. 604-611.
Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic Writing and Plagiarism: a linguistic analysis, London: Continuum.
Klausman, J. (1999). “Teaching about plagiarism in the age of Internet”, Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 27 (2), 1999, pp. 209-212.
Avramidou, E. (2014). Web applications of information and communication technologies in education: the case of plagiarism, Alexandroupoli: Democritus University of Thrace, (Doctoral Thesis) (In Greek).
Sidera-Sideri, I. (2003). “Greek students’ perception of plagiarism and collusion”, Proceedings of the 12 th Panhellenic Academic Libraries Conference, Serres, (In Greek).
Batane, T. (2010). “Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among University students”, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2), pp. 1-12.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2001). Objectives for Information Literacy Instructions: A Model Statement for Academic Librarians. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/objectivesinformati on
Rader, H. B. (1997). “Educating students for the information age: the role of the librarian”, Reference Services Review, 25 (2), pp. 47-52.
Hepworth, M. (2009). “Approaches to providing information literacy training in higher education: Challenges for librarians, New Review of Academic Librarianship, 6 (1), pp. 21-34.