Medical and health sciences’ community attitudes towards hybrid journals, academic networks, social media and research evaluation metrics a perspective from Greece
Published:
May 26, 2024
Keywords:
Open Access hybrid journals academic networks social media research evaluation metrics medical and health sciences
Abstract
Purpose: The present paper attempts to identify medical and health scientists' attitude towards the use of hybrid journals, social media and academic networks and the selection factors of publication medium, including alternative metrics.
Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative survey was conducted, based on a structured questionnaire. It focused on Health Sciences and Medicine, with a population sample mainly consisting of hospital healthcare professionals. Likert scale, simple multiple-choice and ranking type questions were used.
Analysis: 215 completed questionnaires were gathered and various statistics parameters were correlated with the demographic data (profession, experience, gender).
Findings: Most participants agreed that publishing in hybridjournals results in a significantly high cost for the authors which cannot be paid without funding support and probably affects the validity of the evaluation procedures. They also agreed that an open article published in a hybrid journal needs a shorter time for the peer review process, receives more citations and contributes essentially to the research process. Most of the participants use or would like to use ResearchGate and Google Scholar services. Social media involvement was considerably low in participants' responses. The number of publications and the prestige / credibility of the publishing media are considered to be the most important factors in research evaluation and in publishing media selection respectively.
Originality/value: No survey has been reported recently that focuses on health professionals' attitude towards Open Access movement in Greece. It is valuable to explore this community’s attitude because of their extremely active publishing profile, which decisively affects their career and largely contributes to research progress and national innovation.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Kouis, D., & Delikoura, E. (2024). Medical and health sciences’ community attitudes towards hybrid journals, academic networks, social media and research evaluation metrics: a perspective from Greece. Journal of Integrated Information Management, 5(2), 15–25. Retrieved from https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/jiim/article/view/37883
- Section
- Research Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with JIIM agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with:
- An acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Green, T. “Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet‐era transformation of scholarly communications.” Learned Publishing, 32.1 (2019):13-25. doi:10.1002/leap.1219
Suber, P. Open Access. MIT Press. (2012). https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Open_Access_(the_book)
Walker, T. J. “Free Internet access to traditional journals.” American Scientist, 86.5 (1998):463. doi: 10.1511/1998.37.463
Prosser, D. C. “From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access.” Learned publishing, 16.3 (2003): 163-166. doi:10.1087/095315103322110923
Rettberg, N.. The worst of both worlds: Hybrid Open Access. [Blog post] (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.openaire.eu/blogs/the-worst-of-both-worlds- hybrid-open-access
Kingsley, D. & Boyes, P. Who is paying for hybrid? Unlocking Research Blog [Web log post]. (2016, 24 October). Retrieved from https://unlockingresearch-blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=1002
Stockholm University. (2018, 29 June). Library press release 29th June 2018. www.su.se/english/library/about-us/press- information/2.42247/stockholm-university-gives-researchers-more-support-to-get-published-in-full-open- access-journals-1.392523
Sotudeh, H., Arabzadeh, H., & Mirzabeigi, M. “How do self- archiving and Author-pays models associate and contribute to OA citation advantage within hybrid journals.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45.4 (2019):377-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.004
Pool, R. “Open access: at what cost?.” Research Information. (2016). Retrieved from: https://www.researchinformation.info/feature/open-access- what-cost
Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K., Tenopir, C., & Herman, E.. “Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Setting the scene for a major study.” Learned Publishing, 27.2(2014):121-134. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140206
Rodriguez, J. E. “Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40.6 (2014): 604-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013
ESF science policy briefing 47. Open science in biomedical research. (2012) Retrieved from: http://archives.esf.org/publications/science-policy- briefings.html
Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Allard, S., Christian, L., Volentine, R., Boehm, R., ... & Watkinson, A.. “Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an Journal of Integrated Information Management - Vol 05, No 01 24 international questionnaire.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and technology, 67. 10 (2016): 2344-2361. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23598
Rowley, J., Johnson, F., Sbaffi, L., Frass, W., & Devine, E. “Academics behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68.5 (2017): 1201-1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23710
Tenopir, C., Dalton, E., Christian, L., Jones, M., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A.”Imagining a gold open access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship.” College and Research Libraries, 78.6 (2017). doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
García-Peñalvo, F. J. Publishing in open access. (2017). Retrieved from: https://repositorio.grial.eu/bitstream/grial/887/1/PubOA_pr eprint.pdf
Al-Khatib, A., & da Silva, J. A. T. ”Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model.” Publishing Research Quarterly, 33 (2017):164-70. doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016- 9486-z
Lewis, D. W. “The inevitability of open access.” College & research libraries, 73.5 (2012): 493-506. doi.org/10.5860/crl-299
Fry, J., Probets, S., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Spezi, V., & White, S. PEER D4. 2 Behavioural Research: Authors and Users vis-à-vis Journals and Repositories-Final Report. (2011). Retrieved from: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00736168/
Paiva, C. E., Araujo, R. L., Paiva, B. S. R., de Pádua Souza, C., Cárcano, F. M., Costa, M. M., ... & Lima, J. P. N. “What are the personal and professional characteristics that distinguish the researchers who publish in high-and low-impact journals? A multi-national web-based survey.” ecancermedicalscience, 11. (2017). doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.718
Dinis-Oliveira, R. J., & Magalhães, T.”The inherent drawbacks of the pressure to publish in health sciences: good or bad science.” F1000Research, 4 (2015). doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6809.2
Björk, B. C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. “Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.” PloS one, 5.6 (2010). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Ware, M., & Mabe, M. The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. (2015). Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/9/
Van Noorden, R.V. “Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.” Nature, 512 (2014): 126-129. doi:10.1038/512126a
Greifeneder, E., Pontis, S., Blandford, A., Attalla, H., Neal, D., & Schlebbe, K. “Researchers’ attitudes towards the use of social networking sites.” Journal of documentation, 74.1(2018):119-136. doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2017-0051
Acord, S. K., & Harley, D. “Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0.” New media & society, 15.3 (2013): 379-397. doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465140
Grande, D., Gollust, S. E., Pany, M., Seymour, J., Goss, A., Kilaru, A., & Meisel, Z. “Translating research for health poliresearchers'ers’ perceptions and use of social media.” Health Affairs, 33.7 (2014): 1278-1285. doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0300
Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., & Asgari-Targhi, M. “Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368.1926 (2010): 4039-4056. doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. “Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68.9 (2017): 2037-2062. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833
Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. “Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns.” PloS one, 10.3 (2015):e0120495. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J.”Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics.” Scientometrics, 107.2 (2016): 723-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4
Boulos, M. N. K., & Anderson, P. F. “Preliminary survey of leading general medicine journals' use of Facebook and Twitter.” Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, 33.2 (2012): 38-47. doi.org/10.5596/c2012-010
Darling, E. S., Shiffman, D., Côté, I. M., & Drew, J. A. “The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication.” arXiv preprint arXiv (2013):1305.0435. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0435
Butler, D. Publish in Wikipedia or perish. (2008). doi.org/10.1038/news.2008.1312
Maskalyk, J. Modern medicine comes online: “How putting Wikipedia articles through a med' nal' sal’sal's traditional process can put free, reliable information into as many hands as possible.” Open Medicine, 8.4 (2014): e116. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242788/
Andersen, J. P., & Haustein, S. “Influence of study type on Twitter activity for medical research papers.” arXiv preprint arXiv (2015):1507.00154. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00154
Frass, W., Cross, J., & Gardner, V. Taylor & Francis open access survey June 2014. (2014). Retrieved from:https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj44ZjiqHmAhXxAWMBHUHlAhIQFjAAegQIBhAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandf.co.uk%2Fjournals%2Fexplore%2Fopen-access-survey-june2014.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3pqLZmJTaYQ-SypSM9k_Y1
Vlachaki, A. N. Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication Among Greek Biomedical Scientists (Doctoral dissertation, Aberystwyth University). (2015). Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjBpobNj_fpAhXBwQIHHePwACMQFjAAegQIARAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fpure.aber.ac.uk%2Fportal%2Ffiles%2F25436582%2FVlachaki_Assimina.pdf&usg=AOvVaw32WhGtN0RAQ3qWkerqnAMX
Heaton, R., Burns, D., & Thoms, B. L. “Altruism or self-interest? exploring the motivations of open access authors.” College & Research Libraries, 80.4 (2019): 485. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/17396/19175
Lewis, C. L. (2018). “The open access citation advantage: Does it exist and what does it mean for libraries?. “Information Technology and Libraries, 37.3 (2018): 50-65.
Davis, P. M., & Walters, W. H. “The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research.” Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 99.3 (2011): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.008
Mueller-Langer, F., & Watt, R. ”The hybrid open access citation advantage: how many more cites is a $3,000 fee buying you?.” Published as How Many More Cites is a $3,000 Open Access Journal of Integrated Information Management - Vol 05, No 0125 Fee Buying You, (2014):931-954.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2391692
Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z. and Yaghtin, M. “The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals.” Scientometrics, 104.2 (2015): 581–608. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1607-5.
Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. “The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention.” Scientometrics, 103.2 (2015): 555–564. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
Nelson, G. M., & Eggett, D. L. ”Citations, mandates, and money: Author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68.10 (2017):2501–2510. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23897
Mikki, S. “Scholarly publications beyond pay-walls: increased citation advantage for open publishing. “Scientometrics, 113.3 (2017):1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2554-0
Kamat, P. “Impact of Open Access Papers in Hybrid Journals. “ACS Energy Letters, 3.2 (2018):410–411. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00061.
Sandesh, N., & Wahrekar, S. “Choosing the scientific journal for publishing research work: Perceptions of medical and dental researchers.” Clujul Medical, 90.2 (2017):196–202. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-704
Knight, V. L., & Steinbach, A. T. “Selecting an Appropriate Publication Outlet: A Comprehensive Model of Journal Selection Criteria for Researchers in a Broad Range of Academic Disciplines.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3 (2008):059–079. https://doi.org/10.28945/51
Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. “Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes.“ Aslib Proceedings, 57.6 (2005): 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530510634226
Zhang, L., & Watson, E. M. “Measuring the impact of gold and green open access.” The journal of academic librarianship, 43.4 (2017):337-345. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004
Pieterse, E., & Holon, H. M. T. “Academics’ use of academic social networking sites: The case of ResearchGate and Academia. edu.” In Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network 2016 Annual Conference (2016, June):18- 22 Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hagit_Meishar- Tal/publication/309704505_Academics’_us’_of_Academic_Social_Networks_The_case_of_ResearchGate_and_Academiaedu/links/58206e3a08ae12715afbba43.pdf.pdf.pdf
Freeman, M. K., Lauderdale, S. A., Kendrach, M. G., & Woolley, T. W. “Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 43.3 (2009): 478-484. doi.org/10.1345/aph.1L223
Fernández-Luque, L., & Bau, T. “Health and social media: perfect storm of information.” Healthcare informatics research, 21.2 (2015):67- 73.:doi.org/10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.67/
Pershad, Y., Hangge, P. T., Albadawi, H., & Oklu, R. “Social medicine: Twitter in healthcare.” Journal of clinical medicine, 7.6 (2018):121. doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060121
Joung, K. H., Rowley, J., & Sbaffi, L. “Medical and health sciences academics’ behaviours and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals: a perspective from South Korea.” Information Development, 35.2 (2019):191-202. doi.org/10.1177/0266666917736360
Young, J. S., & Brandes, P. M. “Green and gold open access citation and interdisciplinary advantage: A bibliometric study of two science journals.”The Journal of Academic Librarianship, (2019): 102105. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102105
