Historical Research in the Digital Age: Opportunities, Challenges, and Critical Reflections through the Case of Europeana

PDF
Published: Jul 17, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26265/jiim.v10i1.41305
Keywords:
Archival Digitization Europeana Historical Archives Digital History
Christos Papaioannou
Department of Balkan, Slavic & Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract

Purpose - This study explores the impact of digitization on access to and use of historical archives, with emphasis on both the opportunities and the challenges it presents. Through a focused case study of Europeana, the European Union’s flagship digital cultural heritage platform, the paper highlights how digitization has transformed the ways in which archives are collected, organized, and researched. However, this process is far from neutral, raising critical questions regarding historical interpretation and representation.


Design/methodology/approach - The article adopts a qualitative analysis of the operational structure and practices of Europeana. It examines the opportunities digitization creates for historical research, as well as the constraints and challenges associated with metadata quality, copyright restrictions, authenticity, and cultural representation.


Findings - While digitization expands access to historical records and opens new avenues for research, it also introduces persistent challenges. Metadata heterogeneity, restricted access, and issues of authenticity remain significant obstacles. Europeana emerges as an ambitious initiative with both strengths and limitations.


Originality/value - This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities of digital archival access and emphasizes the need for critical engagement, transparency, and ethical responsibility. It underscores the importance of improving metadata quality, enhancing interoperability, and promoting inclusion within digital archives.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with JIIM agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with:
  2. An acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Cohen, D. J., & Rosenzweig, R. (2005). Digital history: A guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the web. Center for History and New Media. https://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/
Freeman, E. (2023). Defying description: Searching for queer history in institutional archives. Archival Science, 23, 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-023-09415-9
Sternfeld, J. (2011). Archival theory and digital historiography: Selection, search, and metadata as archival processes for assessing historical contextualization. The American Archivist, 74(2), 544–575.
Sternfeld, J. (2010). Thinking archivally: Search and metadata as building blocks for a new digital historiography. Paper presented at Digital Humanities 2010.
Europeana Foundation. (2020). Europeana strategy 2020–2025. https://pro.europeana.eu/page/strategy-2020-2025-summary
Skinner, J. (2014). Metadata in archival and cultural heritage settings: A review of the literature. Journal of Library Metadata, 14(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2014.891892
Duff, W. M., & Harris, V. (2002). Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science, 2(3–4), 263–285.
Europeana Foundation. (n.d.). Europeana data model documentation. https://pro.europeana.eu/page/edm-documentation
Garoufallou, E., Banos, V., & Koulouris, A. (2013). Solving aggregation problems of Greek cultural and educational repositories in the framework of Europeana. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 8(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2013.056602
Macdonald, S. (2013). Migrating heritage, networks and networking: Europe and Islamic heritage. In Innocenti, P. (Ed.), European Crossroads: Museums, Cultural Dialogue and Interdisciplinary Networks in a Transnational Perspective (pp. 85–94). Milan: Politecnico di Milano.
Ferreira, S. M., & Pithan, D. N. (2005). Usability of digital libraries: A study based on the areas of information science and human-computer interaction. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 21(4), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750510631695
Force, D. (2024). What the heck am I looking at?: A user-based examination of metadata associated with digital archival objects. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 11(8). https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol11/iss1/8
Siliutina, I., Tytar, O., Barbash, M., Petrenko, N., & Yepyk, L. (2024). Cultural preservation and digital heritage: Challenges and opportunities. Amazonia Investiga, 13(75), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.22
Pacheco, A., Guardado da Silva, C., & Vieira de Freitas, M. C. (2023). A metadata model for authenticity in digital archival descriptions. Archival Science.
Chassanoff, A. (2013). Historians and the use of primary source materials in the digital age. The American Archivist, 76(2), 458–480. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.lh76217m2m376n28
Force, D., & Wiles, B. (2021). “Quietly incomplete”: Academic historians, digital archival collections, and historical research in the web era. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 8(1), Article 18. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol8/iss1/18
Kelly, E. J. (2014). Assessment of digitized library and archives materials: A literature review. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(4), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.954740