Balancing ChatGPT and Data Protection in Germany: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Makers

PDF
Published: Aug 4, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jpentai.35166
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT Privacy Data Protection Germany Ethics of AI Regulations GDPR Policy Making
Fouad Leboukh
Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Emmanuel Baba Aduku
Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Omar Ali
Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Abstract

In the last few months there has been widespread discussion about the remarkable progress made in the field of artificial intelligence, specifically large language models such as "ChatGPT". The ethical implications of AI, particularly concerning data protection, have sparked discussions on the necessity of robust regulations. This article examines the intersection of data protection, ChatGPT, and the ethics of AI, it explores Germany's ongoing efforts to strike a balance between harnessing the potential of large language models as ChatGPT and ensuring responsible and transparent use of AI technology in the policy-making realm. The GDPR serves as a guiding framework, necessitating careful consideration of privacy rights and secure handling of personal data when deploying ChatGPT in Germany's policy-making processes. The study draws on analysis on the current laws and regulations of data protection in Germany while studying Germany's commitment to safeguarding personal information through the active presence of The German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. The first section provides a context and presents the policy problem. The second section looks at the available policy options on the role of policymaking in establishing comprehensive regulations regarding the use of ChatGPT and generative AI. The third section provides recommendations on how Germany can ensure the responsible management of ChatGPT, through strengthening data protection laws and regulations, simultaneously, restricting ChatGPT usage to private users and government, also, embracing appropriate usage of generative AI while developing ethical guidelines and best practices to harness its benefits, fostering innovation and advancement.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) license, that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aldinhas Ferreira, M. I., Silva Sequeira, J., Singh Virk, G., Tokhi, M. O., & E. Kadar, E. (Eds.). (2019). Robotics and Well-Being (Vol. 95). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0
Browne, R. (2023, April 4). Italy became the first Western country to ban ChatGPT. Here’s what other countries are doing. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/04/italy-has-banned-chatgpt-heres-what-other-countries-are-doing.html
Burdon, M., & Telford, P. (2010). The Conceptual Basis of Personal Information in Australian Privacy Law. Murdoch University Electronic Law Journal, 17(1), 1–27.
Chee, F. Y., & Supantha, M. (2023, March 2). ChatGPT in spotlight as EU’s Breton bats for tougher AI rules. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/eus-breton-warns-chatgpt-risks-ai-rules-seek-tackle-concerns-2023-02-03/
Council of the European Union. (2023). ChatGPT in the Public Sector-Overhyped or Overlooked? Analysis and Research Team (ART). https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/63818/art-paper-chatgpt-in-the-public-sector-overhyped-or-overlooked-24-april-2023_ext.pdf
Gordijn, B., & Have, H. ten. (2023). ChatGPT: Evolution or revolution? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 26(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0
Hoffmann, T. (2022). Data Protection by Definition – Report on the Law of Data Disclosure in Japan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4055510
Iyengar, R. (2023). The Global Race to Regulate AI. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/05/05/eu-ai-act-us-china-regulation-artificial-intelligence-chatgpt/?utm_medium=email&_hsmi=257909296&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_fZbx6uEwgsagflVRJWPw9EHm9oTBE1vukvI7VPXDSRApFmzUPLDJJ3kFGEptj_EqUdzefnXaW7t4P4maXdz-z130UoA&utm_content=257909296&utm_source=hs_email
Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
Nalbandian, L. (2022). Increasing the accountability of automated decision-making systems: An assessment of the automated decision-making system introduced in Canada’s temporary resident visa immigration stream. Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100023
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford Law Books, an imprit of Standford University Press.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. (2021). Guidelines for obtaining meaningful consent. https://priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/collecting-personal-information/consent/gl_omc_201805/
Unesco. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Unesco. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
Walters, N. (2019). Privacy Law Issues in Blockchains: An Analysis of PIPEDA, the GDPR, and Proposals for Compliance. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3481701
Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2022). Principles of information security (Seventh edition). Cengage.