test Representations of refugees: Linguistic abstractness and social perceptions|Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society

Representations of refugees: Linguistic abstractness and social perceptions


Published: Dec 31, 2023
Keywords:
language abstraction linguistic category model media representations refugees essentialist beliefs stereotypes
Eleni Lipourli
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-5253
Antonis Gardikiotis
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-6002
Abstract

The paper examines the relationship among stereotype content, essentialism, and preferred language abstraction in refugee media representations. In two studies, participants were asked to choose captions of differential degree of language abstraction (according to the linguistic category model, from descriptive action verbs to adjectives) thought appropriate for an image of refugees, after they first completed a survey on stereotype content (perceived competence and warmth) and essentialist beliefs (Study 2 only) about refugees. In both studies, perceived competence predicted increased language abstraction. In Study 2, competence was also found to mediate the effects of essentialism on language abstraction. These results underline the importance of stereotype content to biased language preference.

Article Details
  • Section
  • BRIEF RESEARCH REPORTS
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Atwell Seate, A., & Mastro, D. (2016). Media's influence on immigration attitudes: An intergroup threat theory approach. Communication Monographs, 83(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1068433
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003
Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & Arcuri, L. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 839-859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839
Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2011). The generic/nongeneric distinction influences how children interpret new information about social others. Child development, 82(2), 471-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01525.x
Estrada, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Seron, E. (2004). The effect of subjective essentialism on lay theories of group differences. Psicothema, 16, 181–186.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2018). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Social Cognition: Selected Works of Susan Fiske, 82(6), 163–214.
Formanowicz, M., Roessel, J., Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2017). Verbs as linguistic markers of agency: The social side of grammar. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(5), 566-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2231
Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551.
Leslie, S. J. (2017). The original sin of cognition: Fear, prejudice, and generalization. The Journal of Philosophy, 114(8), 393-421. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2017114828
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981-993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981
Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60272-5
Mastro, D. E. (2009). Racial/ethnic stereotyping and the media. In R. Nabi, & M.B. Oliver, (Eds.), The sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 377-392). Sage.
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone, (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779143000006
Saucier, G. (2009). What are the most important dimensions of personality? Evidence from studies of descriptors in diverse languages. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00188.x
Shah, D., McLeod, D. M., Gotlieb, M. R., & Lee, A. C. (2009). Framing and agenda setting. In R. Nabi, & M.B. Oliver, (Eds.), The sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 83-99). Sage.
Vraga, E. K., Carr, D. J., Nytes, J. P., & Shah, D. V. (2010). Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum: Understanding the underpinnings of message effects. Political Communication, 27(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903297927
Wigboldus, D. H., & Douglas, K. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79-106). Psychology Press.
Most read articles by the same author(s)