From “haha” το “aha” moments in the workplace: Workplace humour on creativity, the mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of gender

Manuscript
Published: Ιουλ 24, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.46296
Keywords:
creativity, humor, workplace climate, psychological safety, gender,
Anna Anastasopoulou
Laboratory of Organizational Innovation and Management Systems (ORIMAS Lab), Department of Agribusiness & Supply Chain Management, Agricultural University of Athens
Maria Gavala
Independent Researcher
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2815-1182
Abstract

This study examines how workplace humor climate relates to employee involvement in creative work within organizational settings, focusing on the mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of gender. Drawing on research on workplace climate and creativity, we propose that humor climates shape creative engagement through employees’ perceptions of interpersonal safety, with effects that vary across gendered workplace experiences. Using a moderated mediation analytic approach, two parallel moderated mediation models were tested in a sample of 397 employees in Greece, one examining positive humor climate and one examining negative humor climate as the independent variable. In both models, perceived psychological safety was specified as a mediator and gender as a moderator of the direct relationship between humor climate and creative involvement. Results indicate that positive humor climate is associated with higher levels of psychological safety, which in turn relate to greater involvement in creative work, with gender differentiating the strength of the direct association. In contrast, negative humor climate is associated with lower psychological safety, while also exhibiting a gender-contingent direct relationship with creative involvement. Taken together, the findings point to workplace humor climate as a context-dependent social and psychological factor shaping employee creativity through affective safety and gendered identity dynamics, underscoring the relevance of inclusive humor norms and psychologically safe environments.

Article Details
  • Section
  • SPECIAL SECTION
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2024). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33–64). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003573326-3
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
Barsade, S. G., Coutifaris, C. G. V., & Pillemer, J. (2018). Emotional contagion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.005
Biemans, W. G., & Huizingh, E. K. (2024). Why so serious? The effects of humour on creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 33(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12587
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205
Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers’ innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12250
Bitterly, T. B., Brooks, A. W., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2017). Risky business: When humor increases and decreases status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000079
Blanchard, A. L., Stewart, O. J., Cann, A., & Follman, L. (2014). Making sense of humor at work. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000011
Cann, A., Watson, A. J., & Bridgewater, E. A. (2014). Assessing humor at work: The humor climate questionnaire. HUMOR, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0019
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
Chen, H., Wang, L., & Bao, J. (2022). Why does leader aggressive humor lead to bystander workplace withdrawal behavior? Based on the dual path perspective of cognition–affection. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 925029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925029
Cooper, C. D., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2025). Organizational humor: A foundation for future scholarship, a review, and a call to action. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-041448
Dewett, T. (2006). Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01265.x
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Eliav, E., Miron-Spektor, E., & Bear, J. B. (2017). Humor and creativity. In C. Robert (Ed.), The psychology of humor at work: A psychological perspective (pp. 72–87). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671659-11
Evans, J. B., Slaughter, J. E., Ellis, A. P. J., & Rivin, J. M. (2019). Gender and the evaluation of humor at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000395
Felsman, P., Gunawardena, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2020). Improv experience promotes divergent thinking, uncertainty tolerance, and affective well-being. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100632
Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4
Ford, T. E., Buie, H. S., Mason, S. D., Olah, A. R., Breeden, C. J., & Ferguson, M. A. (2020). Diminished self-concept and social exclusion: Disparagement humor from the target’s perspective. Self and Identity, 19(6), 698–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1653960
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
Garcês, S., Pocinho, M., Jesus, S. N., & Viseu, J. (2016). The impact of the creative environment on the creative person, process, and product. Revista Avaliação Psicológica, 15(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2016.1502.05
Giaccone, S. C., & Magnusson, M. (2022). Unveiling the role of risk‐taking in innovation: Antecedents and effects. R&D Management, 52(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12477
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2vrbx78
Hemshorn de Sanchez, C. S., Allen, J. A., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2022). Gender and humor in meetings: A moderation analysis. Psychology of Leaders and Leadership, 25(3–4), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000133
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying…oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.689
Ho, L. H., Wang, Y. P., Huang, H. C., & Chen, H. C. (2011). Influence of humorous leadership at workplace on the innovation behavior of leaders and their leadership effectiveness. African Journal of Business Management, 5(16), 6674-6683.
Hobgood, C., Marks, M., Choi, Y., Papini, N. M., & Draucker, C. (2024). More than a joke: The intersection of gender-based humor and gender inequities experienced by women department chairs in academic medicine. Journal of Women's Health, 33(7), 948–955. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0760
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
Humonen, K., & Whittle, A. (2025). ‘Just relax and ram it in’: Dimensions of power in workplace sexual humour. Organization, 32(3), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231201277
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C.-H. E., McNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright, M. A., & Kim, K. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701662550
Kakar, A. K. (2018). How do team cohesion and psychological safety impact knowledge sharing in software development projects? Knowledge and Process Management, 25(4), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1584
King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2%3C79::AID-MAR2%3E3.0.CO;2-0
Kock, F., Berbekova, A., & Assaf, A. G. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
Lang, J. C., & Lee, C. H. (2010). Workplace humor and organizational creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903466855
Lawless, T. J., O'Dea, C. J., Miller, S. S., & Saucier, D. A. (2020). Is it really just a joke? Gender differences in perceptions of sexist humor. Humor, 33(2), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2019-0033
Logacheva, E. Y., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2021). The impact of humor climate on innovative work behavior: evidence from the banking industry in Russia. Industrial and Commercial Training, 53(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-10-2020-0107
Lu, J. G., Martin, A., Usova, A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Creativity and humor across cultures: Where aha meets haha. In S. R. Luria, J. Baer, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity and humor (pp. 183–203). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813802-1.00009-4
Martin, D. M. (2004). Humor in middle management: Women negotiating the paradoxes of organizational life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000210034
Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. E. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach (2nd ed.). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-00831-0
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
Mesmer‐Magnus, J., Glew, D. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). A meta‐analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial psychology, 27(2), 155-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211199554
Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double‐edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
Miron‐Spektor, E., Paletz, S. B. F., & Lin, C. (2015). To create without losing face: The effects of face cultural logic and social‐image affirmation on creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 919–943. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2029
Moake, T. R., & Robert, C. (2022). Gender, formal organizational status and humor use: Perceptions of social acceptance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(4), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2020-0593
Morreall, J. (2009). Humor as cognitive play. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.014
Ojha, A. K., & Holmes, T. L. (2010). Don't tease me, I'm working: Examining humor in a Midwestern organization using ethnography of communication. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 279–300.
Petrou, P., van der Linden, D., & Salcescu, O. C. (2020). When breaking the rules relates to creativity: The role of creative problem-solving demands and organizational constraints. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.354
Plester, B. (2016). Execution of a joke: Types and functions of humour. In The complexity of workplace humour: Laughter, jokers and the dark side of humour (pp. 39–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24669-7_3
Plester, B., & Hutchison, A. (2016). Fun times: The relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Employee Relations, 38(3), 332-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2014-0027
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rhee, S.-Y., & Yoon, H. J. (2011). Shared positive affect in workgroups. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 505–517). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0017
Robert, C., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2012). The wheel model of humor: Humor events and affect in organizations. Human Relations, 65(9), 1071–1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711433133
Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.20591005
Romero, E., & Pescosolido, A. (2008). Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations, 61(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708088999
Scheel, T. E. (2017). Humor as a social corrective: The role of laughter in group dynamics. Studies in Communication Sciences, 17(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2017.01.005
Schilpzand, P., De Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1976
Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings: Cognitive tuning. In L. F. Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 144–166). Guilford Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
Terrion, J. L., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55(1), 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055001606
Thomae, M., & Pina, A. (2015). Sexist humor and social identity: The role of sexist humor in men’s in-group cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity, and victim blame. HUMOR, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0023
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
Troyer, L., & Youngreen, R. (2009). Conflict and creativity in groups. Journal of Social Issues, 65(2), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01606.x
Unsworth, K. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2010). Why do employees undertake creative action? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X398377
Warren, C., & McGraw, A. P. (2016). Differentiating what is humorous from what is not. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000041
West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309–333). John Wiley & Sons.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
Yong, K., Sauer, S. J., & Mannix, E. A. (2014). Conflict and creativity in interdisciplinary teams. Small Group Research, 45(3), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414530789