Digital transformation: The strain of being an “immigrant” in the digital workplace
Published:
Juli 24, 2026
Keywords:
digital transformation, digital immigrants, digital bureaucracy, technostress, technophobia
Abstract
This paper examines how digital transformation affects the working life of individuals over 50 years old in Greece. It aims to capture how employees experience the changes brought about from the implementation of technological tools and digital processes in their work, and how these changes affect daily life and relationships inside and outside the workplace. Data was collected via eight focus groups with a total of 37 employees and professionals over 50 years of age, from the private and public sector. Among the most interesting findings was that participants seem to perceive digital transformation as an "inevitable evil" that forces them to reject familiar methods that offered them a sense of safety and competence. The findings underline that the acquisition of digital skills tends to be a matter of individual responsibility, self-training and personal investment of time and money in Greece, without adequate support from the workplace/organization. The slow pace of digitization and digitalization processes, fragmentary implementation of digital services, lack of uniform systems and unsatisfactory ergonomics of digital platforms are causing confusion and create a new kind of 'digital' bureaucracy. Within this context, technophobia and technostress develop out of feelings of insecurity and anxiety due to lack of confidence in digital processes, feelings of fear about the irreversibility of digital mistakes, and frustration from having to implement new processes without human/colleague guidance. Good practices have also emerged from the data which are discussed in the final section of the paper.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Sidiropoulou, A., Karakiza, T., Nika, V., & Davou, B. (2026). Digital transformation: The strain of being an “immigrant” in the digital workplace. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 31(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.46304
- Section
- SPECIAL SECTION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3
Agboola, A. A., & Olasanmi, O. O. (2016). Technological stressors in developing countries. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(4), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2016.64025
Antonopoulou, M. G. (2023). Digitalisation, employment relations, and protection of labor rights. Institute of Labor, General Confederation of Greek Workers. https://www.inegsee.gr/ekdosi/psifiopiisi-ergasiakes-schesis-ke-prostasia-ton-ergasiakon-dikeomaton/
Arroyo, L. (2020). Implications of digital inclusion: digitalization in terms of time use from a gender perspective. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2546
Athreya, B. H., & Mouza, C. (2017). Thinking skills for the digital generation: The development of thinking and learning in the age of information. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12382-0
Bednarčíková, D., & Repiská, R. (2021). Digital transformation in the context of the European Union and the use of digital technologies as a tool for business sustainability. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 115, Article 01001). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111501001
Berg-Beckhoff, G., Nielsen, G., & Ladekjær Larsen, E. (2017). Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middleaged, and younger workers - results from a systematic review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 23(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015
Borghans, L., & ter Weel, B. (2002). Do older workers have more trouble using computers than younger workers? Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6909295.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2025). Θεματική ανάλυση: Από τη θεωρία στην πράξη [Thematic analysis: From theory to practice] (Γ. Βλιώρας & Γ. Χατζηχρήστος, Μετάφρ.). Προπομπός.
Breznitz, S. & Godberger, L. (1993) Stress research at a crossroads. In Leo Breznitz & Shlomo Godberger (Eds.) Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. 2nd edition. Free Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.
Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. Routledge.
Dalton, D. (2023, January 31). Why reskilling and upskilling at work are important. https://www.peoplehum.com/blog/why-reskilling-and-upskilling-at-work-are-important
Dropkin, J., Moline, J., Kim, H., & Gold, J. E. (2016). Blended work as a bridge between traditional workplace employment and retirement: A conceptual review. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2(4), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw017
European Commission. (2023). 2030 Digital Decade: Report on the state of the Digital Decade 2030—Annex: Greece. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/2023-report-state-digital-decade
European Commission (2021). Introducing the path to the digital decade. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/introducing-path-digital-decade
European Council (2019). Gender equality in the EU: The Council adopts conclusions. Council of the European Union. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/12/10/gender-equality-in-the-eu-the-council-adopts-conclusions/
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin Programme on Technology and Employment. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Fuchs, T., Prainsack, B., & Scholz, R. W. (2018). Against digital health technologies? On the problematic role of digital health technologies in an ageing society. Public Health Ethics, 11(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phy014
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2010). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press.
Hægeland, T., Rønningen, D., & Salvanes, K. G. (2007). Adapt or withdraw? Evidence on technological changes and early retirement using matched worker-firm data (Discussion Papers No. 509). Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp-509.pdf
Han, J., Yin, H., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2019). Job demands and resources as antecedents of university teachers’ exhaustion, engagement and job satisfaction. Educational Psychology, 40(3), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1674249
Hang, Y., Hussain, Gh., Amin, A., Abdullah, M.I. (2022). The moderating effects of technostress inhibitors on techno-stress and employee’s well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.821446
Hargittai, E. (2008). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective (pp. 936–944). Westview Press.
Harris, K., Krygsman, S., Waschenko, J. & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Ageism and the Older Worker: A Scoping Review. The Gerontologist, 58 (2), e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
Khasawneh, O.Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.008
Komp-Leukkunen, K., Poli, A., Hellevik, T., Herlofson, K., Heuer, A., Norum, R., Solem, P. E., Khan, J., Rantanen, V., & Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2022). Older workers in digitalizing workplaces: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Aging and Social Change, 12(2), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.18848/2576-5310/CGP/v12i02/37-59
Korukonda, A.R. (2004). Personality, individual characteristics and predisposition to technophobia: Some answers, questions, and points to ponder about. Information Sciences, 170: 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.03.007
La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I. & Chiappetta, M. (2018). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupation and Environmental Health, 92, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Why we should think of stress as a subset of emotion. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 21–39). Free Press.
Lee, N., Sameen, H., & Cowling, M. (2015). Access to finance for innovative SMEs since the financial crisis. Research Policy, 44(2), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.008
Martínez-Córcoles, M., Teichmann, M., & Murdvee, M. (2017). Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Technology in Society, 51, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.007
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
Muñoz, L., & Avila, O. (2019). A model to assess customer alignment through customer experience concepts. In W. Abramowicz & R. Corchuelo (Eds.), Business Information Systems Workshops: BIS 2019 International Workshops (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 373, pp. 339–351). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_29
Nagarajan, N. R., & Sixsmith, A. (2023). Policy initiatives to address the challenges of an older population in the workforce. Ageing International, 48(1), 41–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-021-09442-w
Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., Grummeck-Braamt, J-V., Adam, M.T.P., & Tarafdar, M. (2024). Integrating and synthesising technostress research: A metaanalysis on technostress creators, outcomes, and IS usage contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 33 (3), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2154712
Negreiro, M., & Madiega, T. (2019). Digital transformation (PE 633.171). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/633171/EPRS_BRI%282019%29633171_EN.pdf
Nimrod, G. (2018). Technophobia among older Internet users. Educational Gerontology, 44 (2-3), 148-162, https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2018.1428145
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, B. L., Loftus, G. R., & Lutz, C. (2016). Atkinson & Hilgard's introduction to psychology (16th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
OECD. (2019). Working better with age: Ageing and employment policies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c4d4f66a-en
OECD. (2017). Key issues for digital transformation in the G20. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/g20/key-issues-for-digital-transformation-in-the-g20.pdf
Osiceanu, M-E. (2015). Psychological implications of modern technologies: “Technofobia” versus “technophilia”. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229
Phillipson, C. (2019). ‘Fuller’ or ‘extended’ working lives? Critical perspectives on changing transitions from work to retirement. Ageing & Society, 39(3), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000016
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. Freeman.
Sidiropoulou, A. & Davou, B. (2018). “It rings therefore I exist”: Issues of emotional development in the digital world. The Journal of Educational Psychotherapy, 24, 65-75.
Sidiropoulou, A., (2018). Multitasking of existence: Technological mediation in the daily life of the new digital generation. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 23(2), 20-36, https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.22584
Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555313
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2010). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311
The Enterprisers Project. (2020, February 10). What is digital transformation? https://enterprisersproject.com/what-is-digital-transformation
Truța, C., Maican, C. I., Cazan, A.-M., Lixăndroiu, R. C., Dovleac, L., & Maican, M. A. (2023). Always connected @ work. Technostress and well-being with academics. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107675
Usca, S., Mykhailenko, O., Abuže, A., Vindača, O., & Desyatnyuk, O. (2021). Learning for gender equality in post-industrial economy: An online program overview. Education Reform: Education Content Research and Implementation Problems, 1, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.17770/er2021.1.5417
Van Deursen, J. A., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2015). Digital inequality during a pandemic: Quantitative study of differences in COVID-19 lockdowns' impact on internet use and opportunities for digital skills development. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e20073. https://doi.org/10.2196/20073
Van Yperen, N. W., & Wörtler, B. (2017). Blended working and the employability of older workers, retirement timing, and bridge employment. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(1), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw036
Zhao, X., Xia, Q. & Huang, W. (2020). Impact of technostress on productivity from the theoretical perspective of appraisal and coping processes. Information and Management, 57 (8), 103265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103265
