CULTURAL METAMORPHOSIS: KAFKA AND THE THRESHOLDS OF EDITORIAL DESIGN


Published: Jan 15, 2026
Keywords:
Kafka Editorial design Intercultural collaboration Creative constraints Design pedagogy
Renato Seixas
María Gárgoles Navas
Abstract

In 2024, the centenary of Franz Kafka’s death inspired a collaborative academic project between the Universidad de Diseño, Innovación y Tecnología (UDIT, Madrid) and the Escola Superior de Artes e Design (ESAD, Porto). The initiative, entitled Kafka 2024, reinterpreted The Metamorphosis (1915) through editorial design as both a tribute to Kafka and a pedagogical experiment. The project was developed in five phases: an online workshop, a shared editorial briefing, six weeks of remote collaborative production, a public presentation at ESAD, and the final synthesis in a bilingual publication.


This article analyzes the experience in relation to the theme “Polarities, Limits and Thresholds”. Results show that cultural and media polarities functioned as generative dialogues, institutional and temporal limits operated as catalysts for innovation, and pedagogical thresholds facilitated the transition from local classroom learning to international collaborative practice. Beyond the printed outcomes, the project fostered intercultural competencies, critical reflection on design processes, and reinforced institutional networks.


The study demonstrates that editorial design can serve as a laboratory for applied research, capable of producing both creative artifacts and transferable pedagogical models. The collaboration between UDIT and ESAD illustrates how canonical literature can be reactivated as a framework for contemporary design education, where metamorphosis becomes a metaphor for learning in transition—from local to global, from theory to practice.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Artwork/Portfolio
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Bonsiepe, G. (1999). Del objeto a la interfase: mutaciones del diseño [From object to interface: Mutations of design] [in Spanish]. Infinito.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). Blackwell.
Drucker, J. (1994). The visible word: Experimental typography and modern art, 1909–1923. University of Chicago Press.
Hernández, F. (2008). La investigación basada en las artes: Propuestas para repensar la investigación educativa [Research based on the arts: Proposals to rethink educational inquiry] [in Spanish]. Octaedro.
Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education: Merging models. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 141–161). Cambridge University Press.
Lupton, E. (2004). Thinking with type: A critical guide for designers, writers, editors, & students. Princeton Architectural Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.
Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. Springer.
Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine.
van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909).