Public Services Coproduction: A conceptual review based on the relationship between the Citizen and the State

PDF (English)
Veröffentlicht: Dec 30, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/scad.37479
George Sarantidis
University of Peloponnese
Abstract

Public service coproduction is the term used to indicate the active involvement of the citizen/service-user in the process of design and production of that service. The evolu-tion of the concept of Citizenship into that of Active Citizenship and the role attribut-ed to the Citizen-Coproducer, has led scientists to support the idea of a quasi-renegotiation of the traditional Social Contract into a new context based on principles of the coproduction paradigm. The article argues that Coproduction is no panacea: participation in itself can become the antidote neither to the social inequalities nor the absence of balance between the various social groups

Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Articles
Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Autor/innen-Biografie
George Sarantidis, University of Peloponnese

Mr. George Sarantidis is a doctoral candidate in the Dept. of Social and Political Studies of the
University of Peloponnese. He holds a Master’s Degree in Local and Regional Development and a
Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science. Professionally, he is employed as a senior Systems Analyst
and Designer, DPO and Quality Manager at the Hellenic Agency for Local Development and Local
Government (EETAA) SA. Contact: gs8960@gmail.com

Literaturhinweise
Alford, J., 2016. Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending public servicedominant logic. Public Management Review 18, 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/147190
2015.1111659
Alford, J., 2009. Engaging Public Sector Clients. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London. https://doi.
org/10.1057/9780230235816
Alford, J., 2002. Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social-Exchange Perspec-tive. Public
Administration Review 62, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00183
Alford, J., Hughes, O., 2008. Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. The American Review of Public Administration 38, 130–148. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0275074008314203
Aristotle, Lord, C., 2013. Aristotle’s Politics, Second edition. ed. The University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.
Aubin, R., Bornstein, L., 2012. Montreal’s municipal guidelines for participation and public
hearings: Assessing context, process and outcomes. Canadian Journal of Urban Research
, 106–131.
Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., Steccolini, I., 2016. What Mr. Rossi Wants in Participatory Budgeting:
Two R’s (Responsiveness and Representation) and Two I’s (Inclu-siveness and Interaction).
International Journal of Public Administration 14.
Ben-Ari, E., 1990. A Bureaucrat in Every Japanese Kitchen? On Cultural Assumptions and Coproduction. Administration & Society 21, 472–492. https://doi.
org/10.1177/009539979002100405
Bovaird, T., 2007. Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of
Public Services. Public Administration Review 67, 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-
2007.00773.x
Bovaird, T., 2006. Developing New Forms of Partnership with the “Market” in the Procurement
of Public Services. Public Administration 84, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-
2006.00494.x
Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E., 2012. From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users
and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value. Voluntas 23, 1119–1138. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
Brandsen, T., Helderman, J.-K., 2012. The Trade-Off Between Capital and Communi-ty: The
Conditions for Successful Co-production in Housing. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of
Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23, 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-
-9310-0
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., Verschuere, B. (Eds.), 2018. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging
Citizens in Public Services, 1st ed. Routledge, New York, NY: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315204956
Brudney, J.L., 1987. Coproduction and Privatization: Exploring the Relationship and
its Implications. Journal of Voluntary Action Research 16, 11–21. https://doi.
org/10.1177/089976408701600303
Brudney, J.L., England, R.E., 1983. Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Con-cept. Public
Administration Review 43, 59. https://doi.org/10.2307/975300
Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., Bloomberg, L. (Eds.), 2015. Creating Public Value in Practice: Advancing the Common Good in a Multi-Sector, Shared-Power, No-One-Wholly-in-Charge World,
edition. ed. Routledge, Boca Raton.
Castells, M., Castells, M., 2010. The rise of the network society, 2nd ed., with a new preface.
ed, The information age : economy, society, and culture. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West
Sussex; Malden, MA.
Cole, G.D.H., Marshall, T.H., 1951. Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays. The Economic
Journal 61, 420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2226966
Day, P., Klein, R., 1987. Accountabilities: Five Public Services. Tavistock Publications, London;
New York.
Drechsler, W., 2014. The rise and demise of the New Public Management: Lessons and opportunities for South East Europe. CEPAR 7. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v7i3.131
Dunn, W.N., Miller, D.Y., 2007. A Critique of the New Public Management and the NeoWeberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform. Public Organiz Rev
, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007-0042-3
Farnham, D., Horton, S. (Eds.), 1996. Managing the New Public Services. Palgrave Macmillan
UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22646-7
Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, A., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., 1996. The New Public Man-agement In Action, 1st edition. ed. Oxford University Press, U.S.A., Oxford ; New York.
Fledderus, J., 2016. User Co-Production of Public Service Delivery: Effects on Trust.
Fledderus, J., Honingh, M., 2016. Why people co-produce within activation services: the necessity of motivation and trust – an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation
programme in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, 69–87.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566006
Frieling, M.A., Lindenberg, S.M., Stokman, F.N., 2014. Collaborative Communities Through Coproduction: Two Case Studies. The American Review of Public Administration 44, 35–58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012456897
Grönroos, C., 2007. Service management and marketing: customer management in service competition. John Wiley & Sons.
Hirschman, A.O., 2004. Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organi-zations,
and states. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Ishkanian, A., Szreter, S., 2012. The Big Society Debate: A New Agenda for Social Welfare?
Edward Elgar Pub, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA.
Joshi, A., Moore, M., 2004. Institutionalized Co-production: Unorthodox Public Ser-vice Delivery
in Challenging Environments. Journal of Development Studies 40, 31–49. https://doi.org/10
.1080/00220380410001673184
Levine, C.H., Fisher, G., 1984. Citizenship and Service Delivery: The Promise of Coproduction.
Public Administration Review 44, 178. https://doi.org/10.2307/975559
Loeffler, E., 2011. Governance International - Co-production Tree [WWW Docu-ment]. Governance International - Achieving citizen outcomes. URL http://www.govint.org/english/mainmenu/our-services/engagement/%20co-production-tree.html (accessed 8.28.21).
McLaughlin, K., Ferlie, E., P, S.O. (Eds.), 2002. New Public Management: Current Trends and
Future Prospects. Routledge, London ; New York.
Meijer, A., 2016. Coproduction as a structural transformation of the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management 29, 596–611. https://doi.org/10.1108/
IJPSM-01-2016-0001
Needham, C., 2008. Realizing the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improve-ments in
Public Services. Social Policy and Society 7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746407004174
Normann, R., 2001. Service Management: Strategy and Leadership in Service Business. Wiley.
Osborne, S.P., 2010. The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684
Osborne, S.P., 2006. The New Public Governance? Public Management Review 8, 377–387
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Osborne, S.P., Strokosch, K., 2013. It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-production
of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration
Perspectives. British Journal of Management 24, S31–S47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-
12010
Osborne, S.P., Strokosch, K., Radnor, Z., 2018. Co-Production and the Co-Creation of
Value in Public Services: A Perspective from Service Management, in: Brandsen, T.,
Steen, T., Verschuere, B. (Eds.), Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in
Public Services. Routledge, New York, NY: Routledge, 2018., pp. 18–26. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315204956
Ostrom, E., 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of economic
perspectives 14, 137–158.
Ostrom, E., 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2,
–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
Ostrom, E., 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World
Development 24, 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
Ostrom, E., 1978. Citizen Participation and Policing: What Do We Know? Journal of Voluntary
Action Research 7, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976407800700110
Ostrom, E., Parks, R.B., Whitaker, G.P., Percy, S.L., 1978. The Public Service Production Process:
A Framework for Analyzing Police Services. Policy Studies Journal 7, 381–381. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01782.x
Pandelidis, K., Tziritis, E., 2009. Ethelontismos, dasoprostasia kai dasopirosvesi stin Ellada:
Protasi gia tin ousiastiki simmetoxi ton ethelonton stin prostasia ton da-son [Volunteerism,
forest protection and firefighting in Greece: Proposal for a substantial participation of the
volunteers in forest protection]. (Proposal). WWF Hellas, Athens.
Parks, R.B., Baker, P.C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S.L., Vandivort,
M.B., Whitaker, G.P., Wilson, R., 1981. Consumers as coproducers of public services: some
economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal 9, 1001–1011. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
Peña-López, I., 2001. Citizens as partners. OECD handbook on Information, consultation and
public participation in policy-making.
Pestoff, V., 2018. Co-Production at the Crossroads of Public Administration Re-gimes, in:
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., Verschuere, B. (Eds.), Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Routledge, New York, NY: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315204956
Pestoff, V., 2009. The Third Sector, Citizen Participation and Co-Production of Per-sonal Social
Services in Sweden–towards a new paradigm. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.
Pestoff, V., 2006. Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European
countries. Public management review 8, 503–519.
Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., 2013. New public governance, the third sector, and coproduction. Routledge.
Pestoff, V.A., 2008. A Democratic Architecture for the Welfare State, 0 ed. Routledge. https://
doi.org/10.4324/9780203888735
Ramirez, R., 1999. Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for prac-tice and
research. Strategic Management Journal 20, 49–65.
Rhodes, R.A., 1997. Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflex-ivity and
accountability. Open University.
Rosentraub, M., Sharp, E., 1981. Consumers as producers of social services: Copro-duction and
the level of social services. Southern Review of Public Administration 4, 502–539.
Ross, P.D.S., Needham, C., 2013. Co-production in social care: What it is and how to do it.
Social Care Institue For Excellence. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1586.1123
Rossi, U., 2004. The Multiplex City: The Process of Urban Change in the Historic Centre of Naples. European Urban and Regional Studies 11, 156–169. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0969776404041421
Simey, M., 1988. Democracy Rediscovered: Study in Police Accountability, New edition. ed. Pluto
Press, London.
Simmons, R., Birchall, J., 2005. A Joined-up Approach to User Participation in Public Services:
Strengthening the “Participation Chain.” Social Policy & Admin 39, 260–283. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00439.x
Szescito, D., 2018. Legal Dilemmas of Co-Production and Co-Creation, in: Brandsen, T., Steen,
T., Verschuere, B. (Eds.), Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engag-ing Citizens in Public Services. Routledge, New York, NY: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Taylor, M., 2003. Public Policy in the Community. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke,
Hampshire; New York.
Thomsen, M.K., 2015. Citizen Coproduction: The Influence of Self-Efficacy Percep-tion and
Knowledge of How to Coproduce. The American Review of Public Administration. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0275074015611744
Vamstad, J., 2012. Co-production and Service Quality : A New Perspective for the Swedish Welfare State. Routledge.
van de Bovenkamp, H., 2010. The Limits of Patient Power: Examining active citizen-ship in
Dutch health care. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., 2004. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing 68, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A., 2008. On value and value co-creation: A ser-vice systems
and service logic perspective. European Management Journal 26, 145–152. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003
Venetis, K.A., Ghauri, P.N., 2004. Service quality and customer retention: building longterm relationships. European Journal of Marketing 38, 1577–1598. https://doi.
org/10.1108/03090560410560254
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V., 2012. Co-production: The State of the Art in Research
and the Future Agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit
Organizations 23, 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L., 2014. The keys to successful co-creation: an explanation
using causal process tracing. Presented at the EGPA conference, Speyer (Ger), p. 32.
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.G., 2015. A Systematic Review of Co-Creation
and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review 17, 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
Whitaker, G.P., 1980. Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery. Public Administration Review 40, 240. https://doi.org/10.2307/975377
Wikström, S., 1996. The Customer as Co-Producer. European Journal of Marketing - EUR J
MARK 30, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610118803
Wilson, G., 1994. Co-Production and Self-Care: New Approaches to Managing Community
Care Services for Older People. Social Policy & Administration 28, 236–250. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.1994.tb00426.x
Wipf, E., Ohl, F., Groeneveld, M., 2009. Managing natural Locations for Outdoor Recreation:
The role of consultative procedures and the sense of justice. Public Management Review
, 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902989599