A Foucauldian discourse analysis of sexual harassment in Greek academic community


Aggeliki Kiriazopoulou
Kimon Athanasiadis
Triantafyllia Iliopoulou
Abstract

This research investigates the views and perspectives of Greek undergraduate students upon sexual harassment in academic community. The sample was 6 students and the dat were analysed with the use of the Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. Four main themes emerged from the analysis: The “gen-der blind” vulnerability discourse, the power as a driving force,
patriarchy as a developmental factor for the male perpetrator and power relations in the academic community. Patriarchy constitutes a developmental factor for the male perpetrator thus moralising practices and behaviours that develop fear and a culture of silence. Regarding the academic community, power relations are built on the concepts of prestige, profit and on the high ranking position thus interpreting power relations as gender relations.

Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Articles
Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Autor/innen-Biografien
Aggeliki Kiriazopoulou , University of West Attica

Aggeliki Kiriazopoulou is a social worker at the Chronic Care Foundation (NGO), graduate in
So-cial Work at University of West Attica and currently a postgraduate student in Counseling at
Na-tional and Kapodistrian University of Athens majoring in social work.

Kimon Athanasiadis , University of West Attica

Kimon Athanasiadis is a social worker, graduate in Social Work at University of West Attica and
currently a postgraduate student at the Department of Medical School at National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

Triantafyllia Iliopoulou , University of West Attica

Triantafyllia Iliopoulou is an accredited lecturer of the Department of Psychology at Derby University at Mediterranean College and a tactical member of the Hellenic Society of Daseinsanalysis. She has worked as an associate Lecturer at University of West Attica and at National and
Kapodis-trian University of Athens. Her research interests are on criminality, psychotherapy and
counselling. Contact: felinahliop@googlemail.com

Literaturhinweise
Alexias, G. (2006). Sociology of the body from Neanderthal man to exterminator. Greek Letters (in Greek).
Andrews, T. (2012). What is social constructionism?. Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 39-46.
Australian Human Rights Commission. (2008, October). Effectively preventing and responding to sexual harassment: A Code of Practice for Employers. https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/ default/files/content/sexualharassment/quickguide/QuickGuide_2008_web.pdf
Berdahl, L. J., Magley, V., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The Sexual Harassment of Men ?:Exploring the
Concept with Theory and Data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(4), 527-547.
Browne, K.R. (1997). An evolutionary perspective on sexual harassment: seeking roots in
biology rather than ideology. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 8, 5–77.
Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. Routledge.
Burr, V., & Dick, P. (2017). Social constructionism. In B. Gough (Ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of
Critical Social Psychology (pp. 59-80). Palgrave McMillan,.
Cleveland, J. N., & Kerst, M. E. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An underarticulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 49– 67.
Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (1994). Dislocating masculinity: Comparative Ethnographies.
London: Routledge.
Costopoulos, J. S., & Juni, S. (2018). Psychoanalytic Understanding of the Origins of Sexual
Violence. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 18(1), 57-76.
Foxhall, L. (1994). Pandora unbound: a feminist critique of Foucault’s History of Sexuality in A.
Comwall and N. Lindisfarne (Εds.), Dislocating masculinity: Comparative Ethnographies
(pp. 133-146). Routledge.
Garlick, R. (1994). Male and female responses to ambiguous instructor behaviors, Sex Roles.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 5(86), 135-158.
Hoffmann, F. (1986). Sexual Harassment in Academia: Feminist Theory and Institutional
Practice. Harvard Educational Review, 56(2), 105-122.
Hollway, W., Henriques, J., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Gender difference and the
production of subjectivity. Methuen.
Hook, D. (2007). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. In
Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power (pp. 100-137). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lips, H. M. (1991). Women Men and Power. Mayfield Pub Co.
Lister, R. (2007). Το φύλο και η ανάλυση της κοινωνικής πολιτικής. In Ο. Στασινοπούλου (Ed.)
Κοινωνική πολιτική μία άλλη προσέγγιση (pp. 44-60). Gutenberg.
Lothian, A. (2013). Foucault on Biopower. Indiana University.
Mcwhorter, L. (2004). Sex, Race, and Biopower: A Foucauldian Genealogy. Hypatia: Journal of
Feminist Philosophy, 19(3), 38–62.
Noah, Y. (2008). Experience of sexual harassment at work by female employees in a Nigerian
work environment. International NGO Journal, 3(7), 122-127.
O'Hare, E. A., & O'Donohue, W. (1998). Sexual harassment: Identifying risk factors. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 27(6), 561–580.
Pantazis, Β.Α. (2015). Antiracist Education. Αssociation of Greek Academic Libraries (in Greek).
Pina, A., Gannon, T., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment:
Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 126-138.
Ravenhill, J. P., & de Visser, R. O. (2017). There are too many gay categories now: Discursive
constructions of gay masculinity. Psychology of men and masculinity, 18(4), 321-330.
Ridge, D., Plummer, D., & Peasley, D. (2006) Remaking the masculine self and coping in the
liminal world of the gay “scene”. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for
Research, Intervention and Care, 8(6), 501-514.
Stein, A., & Plummer, K. (1994). ‘I can’t even think straight’: ‘Queer’ theory and the missing
sexual revolution in sociology. Sociological theory, 12(2), 178-187.
Stokely, C, & Hamilton, C.V. (1967). Black power: The politics of liberation in America. Random
House.
Tangri, S.S., Burt, M.R., & Johnson, L.B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory
modes. Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 33-54.
Twemlow, S. W. (1999). A Psychoanalytic Dialectical Model for Sexual and Other Forms of
Workplace Harassment. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1(3), 249-270.
Twigg, J. (2004). The body, gender, and age: Feminist insights in social gerontology. Journal of
Aging Studies, 18(1), 59-73.
Van Dijk (1989). Structures of discourse and structures of power. Annals of the International
Association, Communication Yearbook 12, 18-59.
Vaux, A. & Hobfoll, S. E. (1993). Social support: Social resources and social context. In L.
Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp.
–705). Free Press.
Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Keenan, T. (1998). A Self-Regulation Model of the sexual offence
process. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of research and treatment, 10, 141-157.
Willig, C. (2013). Foucauldian discourse analysis. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 129-142). McGraw Hill Education.
Willness, C.R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 127-162.