Privatisation and profitisation in health care. A comparative study of Sweden and the Netherlands
Abstract
During the last 20 years, privatization
became an issue in health care. The neoliberal
market idea promised to increase
efficiency and responsiveness, while at the
same time relieving public budgets. European
countries have introduced all kind of market
instruments, reaching from internal markets,
over DRGs, to increased co-payments.
However, the welfare state literature
currently lacks a detailed explanation of
these different reforms.
All health care systems in the European
Union are affected by the same problem
pattern: demographic change, raising
demand, medical-technical innovations and
labour intensive services. Nonetheless, the
degree and form of privatization varies a lot.
This paper studies the power of ideas within
the framework of structural reform pressure
and institutional path-dependency. The
causes for privatization reforms are studied
in two countries representing the two ideal
types: the Netherlands for Social Health
Insurance and Sweden for the National
Health Service.
Article Details
- Zitationsvorschlag
-
Verspohl, I. (2016). Privatisation and profitisation in health care. A comparative study of Sweden and the Netherlands. Social Cohesion and Development, 7(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.12681/scad.8987
- Ausgabe
- Bd. 7 Nr. 1 (2012)
- Rubrik
- Articles
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
