Diversity and species richness of moths in urban green spaces across Guwahati metropolitan city of Assam, India

Haloi et al 2026.pdf
Published: Jan 31, 2026
Keywords:
Biodiversity Guwahati Lepidoptera moth urbanization
Dip Jyoti Haloi
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:91:"Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, Handique Girls' College, Guwahati, Assam, India";}
Innifa Hasan
Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, Handique Girls’ College, Guwahati, Assam, India
Neepa Das
Department of Zoology, Handique Girls’ College, Guwahati, Assam, India
Lupamudra Borah
Department of Zoology, Cotton University, Guwahati-01, Assam, India
Abstract

Moths form a unique group within the order Lepidoptera, playing a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance. Due to their sensitivity to environmental changes, they act as reliable bioindicators, helping ecologists detect even minor ecological disruptions. Guwahati, the largest city in North East India, has undergone substantial urbanization and environmental changes during the recent years. This study aims to assess the potential effects of urbanization on the diversity and species richness of moths within the urban areas of the city. During the course of the study, 168 individual moths were found in the study area. The Shannon-Weiner diversity index values for moth diversity were 2.47 for Hatigaon, 2.133 for Noonmati, and 1.89 for Lokhra, while the Simpson diversity index values 0.093 for Hatigaon, 0.134 for Noonmati, and 0.153 for Lokhra. The Margalef index was highest in Hatigaon (3.040), followed by Noonmati (2.378), and finally Lokhra (1.518). The Pielou Index values were 1 for Hatigaon, 0.96 for Noonmati, and 0.85 for Lokhra. Given the stark contrast between the city's environment and the surrounding natural habitats, understanding the moth fauna in Guwahati can provide valuable insights into the impact of urbanization on local biodiversity.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 license.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Cook, L. M., and Saccheri, I. J. 2013. The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study. Heredity, 110(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.92
Gaona, F. P., Iñiguez-Armijos, C., Brehm, G., Fiedler, K., & Espinosa, C. I. 2021. Drastic loss of insects (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in urban landscapes in a tropical biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Insect Conservation, 25(3), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-021-00308-9
Hahn, M., Bruhl, C.A. 2016. The secret pollinators: an overview of moth pollination with a focus on Europe and North America. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 10, 21–28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3
Hampson G F. 1891. Illustrations of typical specimens of Lepidoptera Heterocera in the collection of the British Museum. Part VIII-The Lepidoptera Heterocera of the Nilgiri District. Taylor & Francis, London. 144 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.53701
Hampson G F. 1892. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths, Vol. 1, Saturniidae to Hypsidae. Taylor & Francis, London. 627 pp.
Hampson G F. 1894. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths, Vol. 2, Arctiidae, Agrastidae, Noctuidae. Taylor & Francis, London. 609 pp.
Hampson G F. 1895. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths, Vol. 3, Noctuidae (cont.) to Geometridae. Taylor & Francis, London. 546 pp.
Hampson G F. 1896. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths, Vol.4. Pyralidae. Taylor & Francis, London. 594 pp.
Holloway J D. 1983. The moths of Borneo (part 4) Family Notodontidae. Malayan Nature Journal 37: 1–107.
Holloway J D. 1985. The moths of Borneo (part 14) Family Noctuidae: subfamilies Euteliinae, Stictopterinae, Plusiinae, Pantheinae. Malayan Nature Journal 38: 157–317.
Holloway J D. 1986. The moths of Borneo. (part 1). Key to families; Families Cossidae, Metarbelidae, Ratardidae, Dudgeoneidae, Epipyropidae, and Limacodidae. Malayan Nature Journal 40: 1–165.
Holloway J D. 1987. The Moths of Borneo (part 3); Families Lasiocampidae, Eupterotidae, Bombycidae, Brahmaeidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae. Malayan Nature Journal. 199 pp.
Holloway J D. 1988. The Moths of Borneo (part 6); Family Arctiidae: Subfamilies Arctiinae, Syntominae, Aganainae (to Noctuidae). Malayan Nature Journal. 101 pp.
Holloway J D. 1989. The moths of Borneo (part 12); Family Noctuidae: Subfamilies Noctuinae, Heliothinae, Hadeninae, Acronictinae, Amphipyrinae, Agaristinae. Malayan Nature Journal 43: 57–226.
Holloway J D. 1993. The moths of Borneo (part 11); Family Geometridae: Subfamilies Ennominae. Malayan Nature Journal 47: 1–309.
Holloway J D. 1996. The moths of Borneo (part 9); Family Geometridae: Subfamilies Oenochrominae, Desmobathrinae, Geometrinae. Malayan Nature Journal 49: 147–326.
Holloway J D. 1997. The moths of Borneo (part 10); Family Geometridae: Subfamilies Sterrhinae, Larentiinae, Addenda to other subfamilies. Malayan Nature Journal 51: 1–242.
Holloway J D. 1998. The moths of Borneo, part 8: Castniidae, Callidulidae, Drepanidae, Uraniidae. Malayan Nature Journal 52: 1–155.
Holloway J D. 1999. The moths of Borneo (part 5); Family Lymantriidae. Malayan Nature Journal 53: 1–188.
Holloway J D. 2003. The Moths of Borneo (Part 18): Family Nolidae. Malayan Nature Journal 79 pp.
Holloway J D. 2011. The moths of Borneo (part 2); Families Phaudidae, Himantopteridae and Zygaenidae; revised and annotated checklist. Malayan Nature Journal 63: 1–548.
Hughes, S. J., Santos, J., Ferreira, T., & Mendes, A. 2010. Evaluating the response of biological assemblages as potential indicators for restoration measures in an intermittent Mediterranean river. Environmental management, 46, 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9521-3
Kelber A., M. Vorobyev, and D. Osorio. 2003. Animal Colour vision-behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biological Reviews,7881-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793102005985
Kirti JS, Singh N. 2015. Arctiid moths of India. Nature Books (Volume 1). New Delhi, India.
Kristensen NP. 2012. Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies: Volume 2: Morphology, physiology, and development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110893724
McKinney M.L. 2002. Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems, BioScience, 52 (10):883–890, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568
Moore F. 1880. The Lepidoptera of Ceylon, Vol 1. L. Reeve & Co, London
Moore F. 1882. The Lepidoptera of Ceylon, Vol. 2. Reeve & Co, London
Moore F. 1884. The Lepidoptera of Ceylon, Vol 3. Reeve & Co, London
Nath B, Ni-Meister W., Choudhury R. 2021. Impact of urbanization on land use and land cover change in Guwahati city, India and its implication on declining groundwater level. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 12: 100500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100500.
Parikh, G., Rawtani, D., & Khatri, N. 2021. Insects as an indicator for environmental pollution. Environmental Claims Journal, 33(2), 161-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2020.1780698
Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K. C., & Wilkinson, C. 2013. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. 10.1007/978-94-007-7087-4
Paul, M. 2021. Impact of urbanization on moth (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera) diversity across different urban landscapes of Delhi, India. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(3), 204-209.
Rohr, J. R., Farag, A. M., Cadotte, M. W., Clements, W. H., Smith, J. R., Ulrich, C. P., & Woods, R. 2015. Transforming ecosystems: When, where, and how to restore contaminated sites. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 12(2), 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1668
Uniyal, V. P., Dey, P., & Sanyal, A. K. 2016. Diversity of moths Lepidoptera: Heterocera) and their potential role as a conservation tool in different protected areas of Uttarakhand. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun (DST Project Completion Report), 117.
Vähätalo, A. V., Pulli, A., Kulmala, T., Marin, R., & Haimi, J. 2024. Urbanization related changes in lepidopteran community. Urban Ecosystems, 27(2), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01456-3
Van Nieukerken EJ, Kaila L, Kitching IJ, Kristensen NP, Lees D.C. Minet J. et al. Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (ed.), Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa. 2011;3148:212-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.41
Wagner, D. L., Fox, R., Salcido, D. M., & Dyer, L. A. 2021. A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(2), e2002549117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002549117