Geological and tectonic structure of the area between Aigaleo and Parnitha Mt. (Attica, Greece) and their importance to antiseismic planning


Published: Jan 1, 2001
Keywords:
Greece Attica Parnitha Egaleo Tectonics Regional Geology Earthquake Disasters Focusing effects Basin edge effects Rupture directivity effects
Ε. Λ. ΛΕΚΚΑΣ
Σ. Γ. ΛΟΖΙΟΣ
Γ. Δ. ΔΑΝΑΜΟΣ
Abstract

The September 7,1999 earthquake sequence hit the northwestern part of the basin of Athens (area between Aigaleo and Parnis Mt.), causing a large number of deaths and injuries, as well as extensive damage to structures. The major area represents a small basin which is covered by thick post-alpine formations, which are extended talus cones and, to a lesser extent, neogene lacustrine and fluvial deposits. The latter have been blanketed by the talus and the alluvial deposits at the north of the area. The basin is flanked by a hill range, where the non-metamorphic alpine carbonates of the "Sub-Pelagonian" Unit and an allocthonous tectonic melange that belongs to the "Athenian nappe" outcrop. The talus cones, with a thickness that ranges from a few m. to 100 m., contain frequent lateral transitions alternations of cohesive or semi-cohesive scree and loose deposits -sand, pebbles, gravel, clay, etc. The alluvial deposits consist of clay, red soils and conglomerates is clay matrix and have a thickness between a few m. and 20-30 m. The rieogene deposits comprise relatively compacted phacies of marls, marly limestones, clays and conglomerates. The alpine formations of both the autochton and the allocthon consist largely of carbonate rocks (limestones and marbles) and, to a lesser extend, of clastic deposits (sandstones, shales, schists, and graywackes). The main tectonic feature in the area is the contact between the two alpine units, located at the eastern margin. Besides this tectonic discontinuity, numerous other faults were located, either at the basin flanks, or within the postalpine formations. All these faults determined by a large number of boreholes. They are neotectonic structures that belong to two sets, one with NNW-SSE strike and 60°-80° WSWward or ESE-ward dips, and a second one with ESE-WNW strike and 60°-80° northerly or southerly dips. In fact, these faults are directly related to the creation and evolution of the small neogene basin, which is now buried under the talus scree and the alluvial deposits. It is a complex structure, since it incorporates smaller-scale horsts and grabens. The whole picture is in good accordance with the one we get from the greater area. The damage is located within a broad, NNE-SSW trending zone that covers the central and eastern parts of the area. The correlation of this picture with the geological and structural data from the studied area showed that the most serious damage took place on loose foundation formations, which were either the unconsolidated members of the talus cones, or the alluvial deposits. However, this was not the only factor that affected the damage distribution, since the heaviest damage was located (i) along the trace of the tectonic contact between the two alpine units, (ii) at the areas with higher fault density, usually close to the basin margins, but also locally within the basin. These faults were not reactivated in the September earthquake, but "channeled" the seismic energy into specific zones, which also holds, at a larger scale, for the greater meizoseismal area. Hanging wall effects, effects of sedimentary basins, basin edge effects and focusing effects are also probably to have played a significant part, at the locations where the fault geometry and the basin structure performed as reflectors, magnifying the effects of shaking and thus maximizing the strong ground motion values. Besides, the fact that the heaviest damage is located at the central and eastern part of the basin, where the fault fabric is denser and the faults better expressed, is not accidental.

Article Details
  • Section
  • General and Structural Geology
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
BITTNER,A. (1880): Geologische bau von Attica, Boeotien, Lokros und Parnassis. Denksch. Kaiserlichen Akad. der Wissenschaften. Wien 1880.
CLEMENT, B. (1976): Essai d' intepretantion structural d' un secteur des zones internes helléniques: Γ Attique -Beotie. Bull. Soc. geol. Fr., XVIII, 2, 309-316.
ΔΟΥΝΑΣ,Α. & ΓΑΙΤΑΝΑΚΗΣ,Π. (1981): Στρωματογραφικές και τεκτονικές παρατηρήσεις στη βουνοσειρά Αιγάλεω και στο δυτικό τμήμα του λεκενοπεδίου της Αθήνας. Ορυκτός Πλούτος, 13, 21-31.
FREYBERG, Β. (1951): Το νεογενές Βορειοδυτικώς των Αθηνών. ΥΓΕΝ, No 1, Athens.
ΚΑΤΣΙΚΑΤΣΟΣ, Γ., ΜΕΤΤΟΣ, Β., ΒΙΔΑΚΗΣ, Μ. (1986): Γεωλογικός χάρτης της Ελλάδος. Φύλλο Αθήνα-Ελευσίνα. Κλ. 1:50.000, έκδοση Ι.Γ.Μ.Ε.
KOBER, L. (1929): Beitrage zur Geologie von Attica. Sitzung sbec. d. Akad. d. Wiss. in Wien. Abt. I, 138B, 8 Heft, 1929.
LEKKAS, Th. (2000): New Data for Seismic Hazard Analysis. Risc Analysis II (Ed. CA. Brebbia), 245-255, WIT Press.
ΛΕΚΚΑΣ, Ευθ., ΛΟΖΙΟΣ, Σ. & ΔΑΝΑΜΟΣ, Γ. (2000). Αντισεισμικός Σχεδιασμός Δήμου Άνω Λιοσίων. Γεωλογική Νεοτεκτονική Έρευνα. Ερευνητικό πρόγραμμα που εκτελέσθηκε για λογαριαμό του Δήμου Άνω Λιοσίων. 190 σελ., Αθήνα 2000.
LEPSIUS, R. (1893): Geologie von Attica. Berlin 1893.
ΜΑΡΙΝΟΣ, Γ. (1937): Η τεκτονική θέσις του συστήματος των σχιστολίθων των Αθηνών εις την δυτικήν ζώνην αυτού. Πρακτ. Ακαδ. Αθ., 12, 16-21.
ΜΑΡΙΝΟΣ, Γ. (1955): Η ηλικία των μεταμορφωμένων στρωμάτων της Αττικής. Δελτ. Ελλ. Γεωλ. Ετ., 2, 1-13.
ΜΑΡΙΝΟΣ, Γ., ΚΑΤΣΙΚΑΤΣΟΣ, Γ., ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΔΟΥ-ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥΛΙΑ, Ε., ΜΙΡΚΟΥ Ρ. (1971): Το σύστημα των Σχιστολίθων Αθηνών. Ι. Στρωματογραφία και τεκτονική. Ann. Geol. Pays Hell., XXIII, 183-216.
ΜΑΡΙΝΟΣ, Γ., ΚΑΤΣΙΚΑΤΣΟΣ, Γ., ΜΙΚΡΟΥ-ΠΕΡΙΠΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ, Ρ. (1974): Το σύστημα των σχιστολίθων των Αθηνών Π. Στρωματογραφία και τεκτονική. Ann. Geol. Pays Hell, XXV, 439-444.
NEGRIS,Ph. (1912): Sur l'âge des schistes d' Athènes. Com. Red. Ac. Sc. Paris, 154, 1838-1840.
NEGRIS,Ph. (1913): Contribution a la geologie de Γ Attique. Com. Red. Acad. Sc. Paris, 156, 1286-1288.
NIDERMAYERJ. (1971): Die geologische Karte von Athen 1:10.000. Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece, VIII/2, 117-134.
ΠΑΠΑΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ, Δ. (1986): Γεωλογία Ελλάδας. 286 σελ., Αθήνα 1986.
ΠΑΡΑΣΚΕΥΑΙΔΗΣ,Η. & ΧΩΡΙΑΝΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ,Π. (1978): Μιά τομή απ'το βουνό Αιγάλεω. Ο Αθηναϊκός σχιστόλιθος, οι λόφοι της Αθήνας. Δελτ. Ελλ. Γεωλ. Εταιρ., 13/2, 116-141.
PETRASCHECK, W., MARINOS, G. (1953): Zur Geologie von Attica. Kober Festsch., 52-59, Wien.
RENZ, C. (1908): Sur les preuves de Γ existence du Carbonifere et du Trias dans Γ Attique. Bui. Soc. Geol. France, 8, 519-523.
RENZ, C. (1909): Der Nachweis von Carbon und Trias in Attica. Zentz. Miner., 84-87.
SINDOWSKI, Κ. (1949): Der geologische Bau von Attica. Ann Geol. Pays Hell., 2, 163-218.
SOMERVILLE, P. (2000): Seismic Hazard Evaluation. 12th Word Congr. On Earth. Eng., Aukland, New Zealand, Pres. No 2833.
ΤΑΤΑΡΗΣ, Α. (1967): Παρατηρήσεις επί της δομής της περιοχής Σκαραμαγκά - όρους Αιγάλεω - Πειραιώς -Αθηνών (Αττική). Δελτ. Ελλ. Γεωλ. Ετ., Villi, 52-88.
ΤΑΤΑΡΗΣ, Α. (1972): Νεώτερα πορίσματα επί της Γεωλογίας της νήσου Σαλαμίνας και της περιοχής Αττικής. Δελτίο Ε.Γ.Ε., 7/1, 52-58.
ΧΑΡΑΛΑΜΠΑΚΗΣ, Σ. (1951): Συμβολή στη γνώση του Νεογενούς της Αττικής. Ειο. Μελ. Γεωλ. Ελλάδος, Υ.Ε.Υ. Υπουργείο Συντονισμού, Αθήνα.
Most read articles by the same author(s)