Principles of Fortification Project Design: Considering the Effect of Ground Conditions


Published: Jul 29, 2025
Keywords:
Μilitary fortification construction Military geology Underground Shelters Forts of Metaxas Line
Aristea Zachari
Constantinos Loupasakis
Abstract

The advancement of military technology and the destructive power of modern weaponry have necessitated the development of strong fortifications. A fundamental design principle is the careful selection of the site, as geological and geotechnical factors significantly influence the propagation of shock waves and ground vibrations following an explosion. Additionally, the structure's design relies on various factors, including the desired level of security, the types of weapons involved, the topography of the area, and strategic as well as economic-technical considerations. This study aims to explore and enhance the geotechnical parameters and design principles in military fortification projects. When examining the history of fortifications in Greece, the Metaxa Fortification Line along the Greek-Bulgarian border stands out as the largest defensive structure ever constructed in the country. This monumental engineering project, was completed in just four years and was remarkably cost-effective for its time. It comprises 21 fortified complexes featuring numerous surface constructions and thousands of meters of underground corridors and shelters. The overall project integrated various elements, including road construction, tunneling, surface buildings, water supply, drainage, ventilation, lighting systems, and ditches. A crucial aspect of the design was the full utilization of the mountainous terrain and existing obstacles to maximize coverage and protection for the structures. Some of these forts remain intact today, serving as enduring evidence of the scale and significance of this fortification project. This paper presents a brief overview of this fortification achievement to highlight its innovations, which were pioneering for its time, employing techniques that have been adopted in modern fortification projects

Article Details
  • Section
  • Engineering Works and Geological Applications
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bondesan, Α. & Ehlen, J. 2022. Military Geoscience: A Multifaceted Discipline. In: Bondesan, A., Ehlen, J. (Εds), Military Geoscience: A Multifaceted Approach to the Study of Warfare. Advances in Military Geosciences (pp 1–15). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79260-2_1
Bukovalas, G., Gandes, X., Zeris, X., Kazakos, L., & Kouretzis, G. 2008. Guidelines for Studying Fortification Works. N.T.U.A. Athens.
Chowdhury, A. & Wilt, T. 2015. Characterizing Explosive Effects on Underground Structures. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NUREG/CR-7201. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1524/ML15245A640.pdf
Danielson, K., Uras, R., Adley, M. & Li, S. 2000. Large-scale application of some modern CSM methodologies by parallel computation. Advances in Engineering Software. 31, 8–9, 501-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00033-8.
Galgano, F. A., & Rose, E. P. 2021. Military geoscience. In: Alderton, D., Scott, A. (Εds), Encyclopedia of Geology (Second Edition) (pp 648-659). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09141-7
GES/Directorate of Military History (GES/DIS), 1987. The technical aspects of fortifying the Border Zone from 1936 to 1940 (pp 20-69). Athens.
Girbatsis, N. 2018. Rupel Fort 1936 – 1941. Serres: Gorgyra Publications.
Girbatsis, N. 2024. The Battle of the Forts in Historiography, Memory, and Public History. Master's Thesis of Specialization, E.A.P., Patra.
Goey, C., Pei, C. & Wu, C. 2012. DEM Modelling of Subsidence of a Solid Particle in Granular Media. In: Wu, C. (Eds), Discrete Element Modelling of Particulate Media. RSC Publications. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849735032
IGME. (1983). Geological Map of Greece. Scale 1:500.000
Koukis, G. & Kynigalaki, M. 1983. Applications of Technical Geology in Military Engineering Projects and Planning: The Technical Geological Conditions in Greece. Military Review, 10, 1193-1204.
Koukis, G. 1985. Technical Geology in Military Projects. (in Greek) 1st Panhellenic Geological Congress, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 17, 45-50, Athens.
Kupka, V. 2001. Metaxasova Linie. PEVNOSTI. Vol. 19, pp. 20 - 139. Fortprint.
Municipality of Kato Nevrokopi. 2018. Lisse Park Museum. Guest Handbook. Kato Nevrokopi.
Tasios, Th. 2002. The Fortification of Our Northern Border 1936-1940. Greek hands, Greek funding and Greek expertise created a significant technical project. Technical Chamber of Greece Newsletter, vol. 2189, pp. 130-132.
TM5-855-1, 1997. Design and Analysis of Hardened Structures to Conventional Weapons Effects. The Departments of Army, Air Force and Navy and the Defense Special Weapons Agency, USA.
Twisdale, L., Sues, R. and Lavelle, F. 1994. Reliability-based design methods for protective structures. Structural Safety, Vol. 15, (No 1-2), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(94)90050-7
Most read articles by the same author(s)