Foreign policy in a changing multi-faceted global milieu: Revisiting the political-economic interface

PDF (English)
Δημοσιευμένα: Apr 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/hpsa.16365
Michael Charokopos
Visiting lecturer at the University of Piraeus
Περίληψη
The emergence of new influential global actors and the seeming omnipotence of global markets have produced a highly diversified international environment challenging the concept of foreign policy and the theoretical contribution of FPA. In view of this challenge, it is argued that instead of considering the above changes through a fragmentary approach, it would be more efficient to conceive them as part of an ongoing transformation process governing practice and theory in foreign policy. On this background, the political-economic interface is revisited, in order to highlight the significance of the concepts of security and prosperity in the contemporary international framework and to reconsider the question of an interdisciplinary approach to foreign policy.
Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού – Μη Εμπορική Χρήση – Παρόμοια Διανομή 4.0.

Οι συγγραφείς θα πρέπει να είναι σύμφωνοι με τα παρακάτω: Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, δίνοντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης. Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0 και σύμφωνα με την οποία μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς και με δικαίωμα τροποποίησης μόνο με παρόμοια διανομή (αν αναμείξετε, τροποποιήσετε, ή δημιουργήσετε πάνω στο υλικό, πρέπει να διανείμετε τις δικές σας συνεισφορές υπό την ίδια άδεια όπως και το πρωτότυπο).
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Aggestam, Lisbeth. 2004, Role identity and the Europeanization of foreign policy: Α political-cultural approach, in Tonra, Ben and Christiansen, Thomas, eds. Rethinking European Union foreign policy, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, pp.81-98.
Allison, Graham. 1971, The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Co.
Aspinwall, D. Mark and Schneider, Gerald. 2000, Same menu, separate tables: The institutional turn in political science and the study of European integration, European Journal of Political Research 38, pp. 1-36.
Behr, Harmut. 1998, Deterritorialization and the Transformation of Statehood: The Paradox of Globalization, Geopolitics 13, pp. 259-382.
Breslauer, W. George and Tetlock, E. Philip. 1991, Introduction, in Breslauer, G.W. and Tetlock, P.E., eds. Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy, Boulder-San Francisco-Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 3-20.
Buzan, Barry, Waever, Ole and De Wilde, Jaap. 1998, Security: A new framework for analysis, Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Buzan, Barry. 1991, People, States and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd edition, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
Cantir, Cristian and Kaarbo, Juliet. 2012, Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: Reflections on Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory, Foreign Policy Analysis 8, pp. 5-24.
Carlsnaes, Walter. 2004, Where is the analysis of European Foreign Policy Going?, European Union Politics 5(4), pp. 495-508.
Carnoy, Martin. 1984, The State and Political Theory, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Foyle, Douglas. 2003, Foreign Policy Analysis and Globalization: Public Opinion, World Opinion, and the Individual, International Studies Review 5, pp. 163-170.
Galtung, Johan. 1967, Social Position, Party Identification and Foreign Policy Orientation: A Norwegian Case Study, in Rosenau James N., ed. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, New York: Macmillan Co., The Free Press, pp. 161-194.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C.R. 1996, Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, Political Studies XLIV, pp. 936-957.
Harnish, Sebastian. 2012, Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning, Foreign Policy Analysis 8, pp. 47-69.
Hill, Christopher. 2003, What is to be done? Foreign policy as a site for political action, International Affairs 79(2), pp. 233-255.
Hill, Christopher and Light, Margot. 1985, Foreign Policy Analysis, in Light, M. and Groom, A. J.R., eds. A Handbook of Current Theory, London: Frances Pinter, pp. 156-173.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve. 1986, Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making, British Journal of Political Science 16(3), pp. 269-286.
Holsti, Ole and Sullivan, John. 1969, National-International Linkages: France and China as Nonconforming Alliance Member, in Rosenau, James N., ed. Linkage Politics, New York: The Free Press, pp. 147-198.
Houghton, David Patrick. 2007, Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach, Foreign Policy Analysis 3, pp. 24-45.
Hudson, M. Valerie. 2005, Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations, Foreign Policy Analysis 1, pp. 1-30.
Hudson, M. Valerie. 2002, Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Touchstone for International Relations Theory in the Twenty-First Centur, in Snyder, Richard C., Hudson, Valerie M., Chollet, Derek H. and Goldgeier, James M., eds. Foreign Policy Decision Making (revisited), New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-20.
Hudson, Valerie and Vore, Christopher S.. 1995, Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow, Mershon International Studies Review 39, pp. 209-238.
Hyde-Price Adrian. 2004, Interests, institutions and identities in the study of European foreign policy, in Tonra, Ben and Christiansen, Thomas, eds. Rethinking European Union foreign policy, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, pp. 99-113.
Jervis, Robert. 1976, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kaarbo, Juliet. 2003, Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas, International Studies Review 5, pp. 156-163.
Kirchner, J. Emil. 2007, Regional and global security: changing threats and institutional responses, in Kirchner, J. Emil and Sperling, James, eds. Global Security Governance. Competing Perceptions of Security in the 21st century, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Lee, Donna and Hudson, David. 2004, The old and new significance of political economy in diplomacy, Review of International Studies 30, pp. 343-360.
Levy, S. Jack. 1994, Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield, International Organization 48(2), pp. 279-312.
Mazower, Mark. 2000, Dark Continent: Europe’s twentieth century, New York: Vintage Random House.
Marcussen, Martin, Risse, Thomas, Engelmann-Martin, Daniela, Knopf, Hans Joachim and Roscher, Klaus. 1999, Constructing Europe? The evolution of French, British and German nation state identities, Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4), pp. 614-633.
McSweeney, Bill. 1996, Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School, Review of International Studies 22, pp. 81-93.
Milbrath, W. Lester. 1967, Interest Groups and Foreign Policy”, in Rosenau, James N., ed. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, New York: Macmillan Co., The Free Press, pp. 231-251.
Moon, Bruce. 1987, Political Economy Approaches to the Constitutive Study of Foreign Policy, in Hermann, Charles F., Kegley, Charles W. and Rosenau, James N., eds. New Directions in the Comparative Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen and Unwin, pp. 33-52.
Moon, Bruce. 1985, Consensus or compliance? Foreign-policy change and external dependence, International Organization 39(2), pp. 297-329.
Neack, Laura, Hey, Leanne and Haney, Patrick. 1995, Generational Change in Foreign Policy Analysis, in Neack, Laura, Hey, Leanne and Haney, Patrick, eds. Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 1-16.
Nye, Jr. Joseph and Keohane, Robert. 1971, Transnational relations and World Politics: A Conclusion, International Organization 25(3), pp. 721-748.
Powlick, J. Philip and Kat, Z. Anrew. 1998, Defining the American Public Opinion/ Foreign Policy Nexus, Meshon International Studies Review 42, pp. 29-61.
Putnam, D. Robert. 1988, Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games, International Organization 42(3), pp. 427-460.
Richardson, R. Neil and Kegley, W. Charles Jr. 1980, Trade Dependence and Foreign Policy Compliance: A Longitudinal Analysis, International Studies Quarterly 24(2), pp. 191-222.
Richardson, R. Neil. 1976, Political Compliance and US Trade Dominance, American Political Science Review 70, pp. 1098-1109.
Rosenau, N. James. 1988, CFP and IPE: the anomaly of mutual boredom, International Interactions 14(1), pp. 17-26 [Reprinted in Rosenau, James N.. 2006, The study of World Politics: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges, vol. I, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 84-95].
Rosenau, N. James. 1969, Toward the Study of National-International Linkages, in Rosenau, J., ed. Linkage Politics, New York: The Free Press, pp. 44-66.
Rosenau, James. 1968, National interest, in Sills, David and Merton, Robert, eds. International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, London: Macmillan [Reprinted in Rosenau, James N.. 2006, The study of World Politics: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges, vol. I, London and New York: Routledge].
Rosenau, N. James. 1967, Foreign Policy as an issue-area, in Rosenau, J., ed. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press, pp. 11-50.
Rosenau, N. James. 1966, Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy, in Farrel, R. Barry, ed. Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 27-92 [Reprinted in Rosenau, James N.. 2006, The study of World Politics: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges, vol. I, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 171-199].
Singer, J. David. 1969, The Behavioral Science Approach to International Relations: Payoffs and Prospects, in Rosenau, James N., ed. International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press, pp. 65-70 [Reprinted from SAIS Review, X (Summer 1966), pp. 12-20].
Singer, J. David. 1969, The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations, in Rosenau, James N., ed. International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press, pp. 20-29 [Reprinted from Knorr, Klaus and Verba, Sidney, eds. The International System: Theoretical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 77-92].
Smith, Karen and Light, Margot. 2004, Introduction, in Karen, Smith and Margot, Light, eds. Ethics and Foreign Policy, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-11.
Smith, Steve. 1983, Foreign Policy Analysis: British and American Orientations and Methodologies, Political Studies XXXI, pp. 556-565.
Snyder, C. Richard, Bruck, H.W. and Sapin, Burton. 2002, Decision Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics, in Snyder, Richard C., Hudson, Valerie M., Chollet, Derek H. and Goldgeier, James M., eds. Foreign Policy Decision Making (revisited), New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21-152.
Sprout, Harold and Margaret. 1969, Environmental Factors in the Study of International Politics, in Rosenau, James N., ed. International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press, pp. 41-56 [Reprinted from the Journal of Conflict Resolution I, 1957, pp. 309-328].
Stein, Janice Gross. 1994, Political learning by doing: Gorbachev as uncommitted thinker and motivated learner, International Organization 48(2), pp. 155-183.
Strange, Susan. 1998, Mad Money, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Strange, Susan. 1992, States, firms and diplomacy, International Affairs 68(1), pp. 1-15.
Strange, Susan. 1991, An Eclectic Approach, in Murphy, Craig N. and Tooze, Roger, eds. The New International Political Economy, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 33-49.
Strange, Susan. 1986, Casino Capitalism, Oxford: Blackwell.
Strange, Susan. 1970, International Economics and International Relations: A Case of Mutual Neglect, International Affairs 46(2), pp. 304-315.
Testimony of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. 2012, 2013 budget request for the State Department and USAID, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations, Washington DC, 28 February [http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/ht-state.cfm?, accessed 25 September 2015].
The Council on Foreign Relations and the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. 2001, Report of an Independent Task Force on “State Department Reform”, New York
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. 2012, Policy Agenda 2012. Key policy changes 2012 [http://www.minbuza.nl/en/ministry /policy-and-budget/policy-agenda-2012.html, accessed 20 October 2015].
Thies, G. Cameron and Breuning, Marijke. 2012, Integrating Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations through Role Theory, Foreign Policy Analysis 8, pp. 1-4.
Tooze, Roger. 1984, Perspectives and Theory: A Consumers’ Guide, in Strange, Susan, ed. Paths to International Political Economy, London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 1-22.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974, The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparativist Analysis, Comparativist Studies in Society and History 16(4), pp. 387-415.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1994, Collective identity formation and the international state, American Political Science Review 88(2), pp. 384-396.
Wendt, Alexander. 1987, The agent-structure problem in international relations theory, International Organization 41(3), pp. 336-370.
White, Brian. 1999, The European Challenge to Foreign Policy Analysis, European Journal of International Relations 5(1), pp. 37-66.
Wight, Collin. 2006, Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wittkopf, R. Eugene. 1973, Foreign Aid and United Nations Votes: A Comparative Study, The American Political Science Review 67(3), pp. 868-888.