Company Logo: three steps that symbolise the speaker's rostrum at Pnyx on a rocky background; to the right, text: Pnyx: Journal of Classical Studies

The Vocabulary and Moments of Change: Thucydides and Isocrates on the Rise and Fall of Athens and Sparta

PDF (English) XML (English) ePub (English)
Pubblicato: März 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55760/pnyx.2022.3
Alexandra Bartzoka
Department of History and Archaeology, University of Patras
Abstract

This paper presents the events classical authors deemed as key moments in the rise and fall of Athens and Sparta, and examines the vocabulary they used to describe change: its extent (momentary or long-lasting), nature (evolution, transition, reversal, destruction, renewal), and effects (positive or negative). The Persian Wars, the end of the Peloponnesian War, and the battles of Cnidus, Naxos, and Leuctra were frequently thought of as the causes of Athens’ and Sparta’s growth or collapse, prosperity or misfortune. Τhese events were not only key moments in the balance of power in interstate relations, but also part of a particular argumentation which exploited and presented the phenomenon of change in several ways and through varying narratives. The study of the vocabulary pertaining to the rise and fall of the two cities reveals, on the one hand, the different ways one can treat change and, on the other hand, that the relevant words can convey neutral, positive or negative connotations, depending especially on an author’s intentions when emphasising a particular event.


##plugins.themes.ekt-hometheme.article.details##
  • Sezione
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.

Isegoria believes in the dissemination of research without restrictions. That is why we publish Open Access, digital works under the Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0), following the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities and the latest developments according to the Plan S (Coalition-S). 

This licence allows anyone, including the author, to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt, and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source. Thus, all works published by Isegoria exceed all funder or institutional requirements for research to be published Open Access. Naturally, in case there is a need for a different CC BY licence (i.e. BY-ND/BY-NC-ND) due to third-party permissions, we are happy to discuss and review on a case-by-case basis.   

The published Open Access books are discoverable via the Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB) and can be catalogued without restrictions to institutional repositories, academic research networks, personal websites, and be circulated freely on the web.

Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
ACCAME, S. 1941. La lega ateniese del secolo IV a.C. Rome: A. Signorelli.
ALEXIOU, E. 2010. Der Euagoras des Isokrates. Ein Kommentar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
ALEXIOU, E. 2015. ἀρχὴ τῆς θαλάττης – ἀρχὴ τῶν κακῶν? Kompetitive Motivationen bei Thukydides, Ps.-Xenophon und Isokrates. Historika, 5, 405-421.
ASHERI, D., LLOYD, A. B., and CORCELLA, A. 2007. A Commentary on Herodotus Books I-IV. Edited by O. Murray and A. Moreno. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ATACK, C. 2018. Imagined Superpowers: Isocrates’ Opposition of Athens and Sparta. In: CARTLEDGE, P. and POWELL, A. (eds.) The Greek Superpower: Sparta in the Self-Definitions of Athenians, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 157-184.
BARON, C. A. 2006. The Aristoteles Decree and the Expansion of the Second Athenian League. Hesperia, 75, 379-395.
BARTZOKA, A. 2015. L’Aréopage et le dèmos dans la vision politique et morale d’Isocrate. In: BOUCHET, C. and GIOVANNELLI-JOUANNA, P. G. (eds.) Isocrate: entre jeu rhétorique et enjeux politiques, Collection du Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur l'Occident Romain. Nouvelle série, 47, Paris: De Boccard, 175-183.
BARTZOKA, A. 2017. La guerre des Alliés. Un point de rupture vu sous le prisme des textes du milieu du IVe siècle. Camenulae, 18, 1-12.
BARTZOKA, A. 2018. Le tribunal de l’Héliée. Justice et Politique dans l’Athènes du VIe au IVe siècles avant J.-C. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
BARTZOKA, A. 2020. Construire et déconstruire la légitimité. De l’hégémonie à l’archè athénienne (Ve siècle avant J.-C.). In: CORMIER, P., GILLY, X. and GIRARDIN, M. (eds.) Construire la légitimité politique de l’Antiquité à nos jours, Paris: Classiques Garnier, 59-69.
BARTZOKA, A. 2022. Penser le changement à l’envers: le passé, la tradition et les ancêtres vus par les différentes générations de l’époque classique. Klio, 104(1).
BEARZOT, C. 2010. Le potenze egemoniche greche nel quadro della storia universale. In: ROBERTO, U. and MECELLA, L. (eds.) Dalla storiografia ellenistica alla storiografia tardoantica: aspetti, problemi, prospettive. Atti del Convegno, Roma 23-25 ottobre 2008, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 11-24.
BEARZOT, C. 2013. Come si abbatte una democrazia. Tecniche di colpo di Stato nell’Atene antica. Bari: Laterza.
BEARZOT, C. 2015. L’impero del mare come egemonia subalterna nel IV secolo (Diodoro, Libri XIV-XV). Aevum, 89, 83-91.
BEARZOT, C. 2020. Studi su Isocrate (1980-2020). Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.
BECK, H. and GANTER, A. 2015. Boiotia and the Boiotian Leagues. In: BECK, H. and FUNKE, P. (eds.) Federalism in Greek Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132-157.
BERTELLI, L. 1989. Metabole politeion. Filosofia Politica, 3, 275-326.
BOËLDIEU-TREVET, J. 2016. Les commandements alliés dans le monde grec de la deuxième guerre médique à la bataille de Chéronée. In: COUVENHES, J-C. (ed.) La symmachia comme pratique du droit international dans le monde grec, Dialogue d’histoire ancienne, Supplément 16, Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, 67-95.
BONNIN, G. 2014. Les Cyclades face à l’impérialisme d’Athènes: entre coercition et acceptation. In: BONNIN, G. and LE QUERE, E. (eds.) Pouvoirs, îles et mer. Formes et modalités de l’hégémonie dans les Cyclades antiques (VIIe s. a.C.-IIIe s. p.C.), Bordeaux: Ausonius, 57-68.
BONNIN, G. 2015. De Naxos à Amorgos. L’impérialisme athénien vu des Cyclades à l’époque classique, Scripta Antiqua 75. Bordeaux: Ausonius.
BOUCHET, C. 2014. Isocrate l’Athénien, ou la belle hégémonie. Étude des relations internationales au IVe siècle a.C., Scripta Antiqua 60. Bordeaux: Ausonius.
BOUCHET, C. 2015. Isocrate, la seconde Confédération maritime et l’Aréopagitique. Historika, 5, 423-431.
BROCK, R. 2009. Did the Athenian Empire Promote Democracy? In: MA, J., PAPAZARKADAS, N. and PARKER, R. (eds.) Interpreting the Athenian Empire, London: Duckworth, 149-166.
BUCKLER, J. 2003. Aegean Greece in the Fourth Century BC. Leiden: Brill.
BUCKLER, J. 2013. Epaminondas at Leuctra, 371 B.C. In: CAMPBELL, B. and TRITLE, L. A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Warfare in the Classical World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 657-670.
BUCKLER, J. AND BECK. H. 2008. Central Greece and the Politics of Power in the Fourth Century BC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CARGILL, J. L. 1981. The Second Athenian League: Empire or Free Alliance? Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
CARTLEDGE, P. 2002. Sparta and Lakonia: A Regional History 1300-362 BC, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
CARTLEDGE, P. AND GREENWOOD, E. 2002. Herodotus as a Critic: Truth, Fiction, Polarity. In: BAKKER, E. J., DE JONG, I. J. F. and VAN WEES, H. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden: Brill, 351-371.
CAWKWELL, G. 2011. Cyrene to Chaeronea: Selected Essays on Ancient Greek History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CECCARELLI, P. 1993. Sans thalassocratie, pas de démocratie? Le rapport entre thalassocratie et démocratie à Athènes dans la discussion du Ve et IVe siècle av. J.-C. Historia, 42, 444-470.
CHRISTESEN, P. 2010. Spartans and Scythians, A Meeting of Mirages: The Portrayal of the Lycurgan Politeia in Ephorus’ Histories. In: POWELL, A. and HODKINSON, S. (eds.) Sparta: The Body Politic, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 211-263.
CONNOR, W. R. 1984. Thucydides, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
CROISET, M. 1925. Démosthène, Harangues II. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
DAVERIO ROCCHI, G. 1991. Le poleis megalai e mikrai come tema letterario, motivo politico e rapporto giuridico. Acme, 44, 53-73.
DAVERIO ROCCHI, G. 2015. Immaginario del mare e homonoia. Luoghi reali e virtuali dell’ armonia e dell’ amicizia nella retorica politica e nella prassi (IV sec. a.C.). Historika, 5, 83-96.
DAVIDSON, J. 1990. Isocrates Against Imperialism: An Analysis of the De Pace. Historia, 39, 20-36.
DE MARTINIS, L. 2018. Eubulo e i Poroi di Senofonte. L’Atene del IV secolo tra riflessione teorica e pratica politica. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.
DE STE. CROIX, G. E. M. 1961. Notes on Jurisdiction in the Athenian Empire. I. Classical Quarterly, 11, 94-112.
DEMONT, P. 2003. La réflexion d’Isocrate sur le pouvoir dans les années 360-350. In: FROMENTIN, V., RODDAZ, J.-M., GOTTELAND, S. and FRANCHET D’ESPEREY, S. (eds.) Fondements et crises du pouvoir, Études 9. Bordeaux: Ausonius, 35-46.
DREHER, M. 1995. Hegemon und Symmachoi. Untersuchungen zum zweiten athenischen Seebund. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 46. Berlin: De Gruyter.
EIDINOW, E. 2011. Luck, Fate and Fortune: Antiquity and its Legacy. London: Bloomsbury.
FARRELL, C. A. 2016. Xenophon Poroi 5: Securing a ‘More Just’ Athenian Hegemony. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought, 33, 331-355.
FLOWER, M. A. 2017. Xenophon as a Historian. In: Flower, M. A. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 301-322.
FRAGOULAKI, M. 2013. Kinship in Thucydides: Intercommunal Ties and Historical Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FRAGOULAKI, M. 2016. Emotion, Persuasion and Kinship in Thucydides: The Plataian Debate (3.52-68) and the Melian Dialogue (5.83-113). In: SANDERS, E. and JOHNCOCK, M. (eds.) Emotion and Persuasion in Classical Antiquity, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 113-132.
GAUTHIER, P. 1972. Symbola. Les étrangers et la justice dans les cités grecques. Nancy: Université de Nancy II.
GAUTHIER, P. 1976. Un commentaire historique des Poroi de Xénophon. Genève: Librairie Droz.
GAUTHIER, P. 1985. Les cités grecques et leurs bienfaiteurs. Contribution à l’histoire des institutions, Suppléments au Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 12. Paris: École Française d'Athènes.
GAUTHIER, P. 1987-1989. Grandes et petites cités: hégémonie et autarcie. Opus, 7-8, 187-202.
GRAY, V. 1989. The Character of Xenophon’s Hellenica. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins' University Press.
HANSEN, M. H. 1974. The Sovereignty of the People’s Court in Athens in the Fourth Century B.C. and The Public Action against Unconstitutional Proposals. Odense: Odense University Press.
HARDING, P. 2008. The Story of Athens: The Fragments of the Local Chronicles of Attika. London: Routledge.
HARRIS, E. M. 2008. Demosthenes: Speeches 20-22, The Oratory of Classical Greece 12, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
HORNBLOWER, S. 1991. A Commentary on Thucydides, vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HORNBLOWER, S. 2011. The Greek World 479-323 BC, 4th edition. London: Routledge.
INGRAVALLE, F. 1989. Conflitti e trasformazioni costituzionali nella ‘‘Costituzione degli Ateniesi’’. Filosofia Politica, 3, 327-352.
JOHO, T. 2021. The Peloponnesian War and the State of Nature in Thucydides: The Coincidence of Motion and Rest. In: BRUZZONE, R. (ed.) Polemos and his Children: War, its Repercussions, and Narrative in Ancient Greek Literature, Histos Supplements 12, Histos, 17-45.
JOUANNA, J. 2005. Cause and Crisis in Historians and Medical Writers of the Classical Period. In: VAN DER EIJK, J. P. J. (ed.) Hippocrates in Context: Papers Read at the XIth International Hippocrates Colloquium University of Newcastle upon Tyne 27–31 August 2002, Leiden: Brill, 3-27.
JOUANNA, J. 2012. Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers, Studies in Ancient Medicine 40. Leiden: Brill.
KAGAN, D. 1981. The Peace of Nicias and the Sicilian Expedition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
KALLET, L. 2017. The Pentecontaetia. In: FORSDYKE, S., FOSTER, E. and BALOT, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63-80.
KIERSTEAD, J. 2016. The Delian and Second Athenian Leagues: The Perspective of Collective Action. In: ARMSTRONG, J. (ed.) Circum Mare: Themes in Ancient Warfare, Mnemosyne Supplements 388, Leiden: Brill, 164-181.
KONSTAN, D. 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
LANDUCCI, F. 2018. La translatio imperii dal mondo greco al mondo romano. Erga-Logoi, 6, 7-28.
LEVY, E. 2015. La Sparte d’Isocrate. In: BOUCHET, C. and GIOVANNELLI-JOUANNA, P. G. (eds.) Isocrate: entre jeu rhétorique et enjeux politiques, Collection du Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur l'Occident Romain. Nouvelle série, 47, Paris: De Boccard, 245-271.
LIDDEL, P. 2010. Metabole Politeion as Universal Historiography. In: LIDDEL, P. and FEAR, A. (eds.) Historiae Mundi: Studies in Universal History, London: Bloomsbury, 15-29.
LODDO, L. 2016. Cambiamenti costituzionali nei Philippika di Teopompo di Chio. Incidenza dell’Antico, 14, 175-206.
LORAUX, N. 1997. La cité divisée. L’oubli dans la mémoire d’Athènes. Paris: Payot et Rivages.
LOW, P. 2007. Interstate Relations in Classical Greece: Morality and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LOW, P. 2017. Thucydides on the Athenian Empire and Interstate Relations (431-404). In: FORSDYKE, S., FOSTER, E. and BALOT, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99-114.
LURAGHI, N. 2014. Ephorus in Context. In: PARMEGIANNI, G. (ed.) Between Thucydides and Polybius: The Golden Age of Greek Historiography, Hellenic Studies Series 64, Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, 133-151.
MASARACCHIA, A. 1995. Isocrate. Retorica e politica, Filologia e Critica 73, Rome: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale.
MACKIL, E. 2013. Creating a Common Polity: Religion, Economy, and Politics in the Making of the Greek Koinon, Hellenistic Culture and Society 55, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
MEIGGS, R. 1972. The Athenian Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MIGEOTTE, L. 2014. Les finances des cités grecques aux périodes classique et hellénistique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
MILLENDER, E. 2015. The Spartans “at Sea”. Historika, 5, 299-312.
MUNSON, R. V. 2015. Natural Upheavals in Thucydides (and Herodotus). In: CLARK, C. A., FOSTER, E. and HALLETT, J. P. (eds.) Kinesis: The Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 41-59.
NOUHAUD, M. 1982. L’utilisation de l’histoire par les orateurs attiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
PAPILLON, T. L. 2004. Isocrates II, The Oratory of Classical Greece 7, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
PARMEGIANNI, G. 2011. Eforo di Cuma. Studi di storiografica greca, Studi di storia 14, Bologna: Patròn.
PEBARTHE, C. 2011. L’empire athénien est-il toujours un empire comme les autres? Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, Supplemént 5, 57-88.
PERYSINAKIS, I. 2015. «Μέγα τὸ τῆς θαλάσσης κράτος» (Θουκ. Ι 143, 5): αρχαιολογία της ιδέας. Historika, 5, 387-404.
PODDIGHE, E. 2014. Aristotele, Atene e le metamorfosi dell’idea democratica: da Solone a Pericle (594-451 a.C.). Rome: Carocci.
PODDIGHE, E. 2019. Politeia nella storiografia e nel pensiero storico greco tra V e IV secolo a.C.: la questione della continuità e del mutamento. Gerión, 37, 271-300.
RHODES, P. J. 2008. After the Three-Bar Sigma Controversy: The History of Athenian Imperialism Reassessed. Classical Quarterly, 58, 501-506.
ROBERTS, J. T. 2017. The Plague of War: Athens, Sparta, and the Struggle for Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ROCKWELL, N. 2017. Thebes: A History. London: Routledge.
RÖSLER, W. 2002. The Histories and Writing. In: BAKKER, E. J., DE JONG, I. J. F. and VAN WEES, H. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden: Brill, 79-94.
ROTH, P. 2003. Der Panathenaikos des Isokrates. Übersetzung und Kommentar, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 196. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
RUSTEN, J. S. 2015, Kinesis in the Preface to Thucydides. In: CLARK, C. A., FOSTER, E. and HALLETT, J. P. (eds.) Kinesis: the Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 27-40.
RUZE, F. 2018. The Empire of the Spartans (404-371). In: POWELL, A. (ed.) A Companion to Sparta, vol. I, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 320-353.
RYFFEL, H. 1949. Metabole Politeion: Der Wandel der Staatsverfassungen. Bern: Arno Press.
SANDERS, E. 2012. Beyond the Usual Suspects: Literary Sources and the Historian of Emotions. In: CHANIOTIS, A. (ed.) Unveiling Emotions: Sources and Methods for the Study of Emotions in the Greek World, Heidelberger Althistorische Beitrage Und Epigraphische Studien 52, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 151-173.
SAXONHOUSE, A. W. 2017. Kinesis, Navies, and the Power Trap in Thucydides. In: FORSDYKE, S., FOSTER, E. and BALOT, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 339-353.
SCHEILBELREITER, P. 2013. Untersuchungen zur vertragsrechtlichen Struktur des delisch-attischen Seebundes, Akten der Gesellschaft für griechische und hellenistische Rechtsgeschichte 22. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
SEAGER, R. 1967. Thrasybulus, Conon and Athenian Imperialism, 396-386 B.C. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 87, 95-115.
SEAGER, R. 1994. The Corinthian War. In: LEWIS, D. M., BOARDMAN, J., HORNBLOWER, S. and OSTWALD, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Ancient History (CAH). Volume VI: The Fourth Century B.C., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97-119.
SEBASTIANI, B. B. 2018. The Coups of 411 and 404 in Athens: Thucydides and Xenophon on Conservative Turns. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 58, 490-515.
STERLING, N. 2004. Xenophon’s Hellenica and the Theban Hegemony. In: TUPLIN, C. and AZOULAY, V. (ed.) Xenophon and his World: Papers from a Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999, Historia Einzelschriften 172, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 453-462.
STRASSLER, R. B. (ed.) 2008. Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War, Translated by R. Crawley. New York: The Free Press.
STRASSLER, R. B. (ed.) 2009. The Landmark Herodotus: The Histories, Translated by A. Purvis. New York: Anchor Books.
STRASSLER, R. B. (ed.) 2010. The Landmark Xenophon’s Hellenika, Translated by J. Marincola. New York: Anchor Books.
STRAUSS, B. S. 1986. Athens after the Peloponnesian War: Class, Faction, and Policy 403-386. London: Croom Helm.
THOMAS, R. 2006. Thucydides’ Intellectual Milieu and the Plague. In: RENGAKOS, A. and TSAKMAKIS, A. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, Leiden: Brill, 87-108.
THOMAS, R. 2017. Thucydides and His Intellectual Milieu. In: FORSDYKE, S., FOSTER, E., and BALOT, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 567-586.
TOO, Y. L. and MIRHADY, D., Isocrates I, The Oratory of Classical Greece 4, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
TREVETT, J. 2011, Demosthenes: Speeches 1-17, The Oratory of Classical Greece 14, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
TSAKMAKIS, A. 2017. Speeches. In: FORSDYKE, S., FOSTER, E. and BALOT, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267-281.
TUCI, P. A. 2019. The Speeches of Theban Ambassadors in Greek Literature (404-362 B.C.). Ktema, 44, 33-52.
TUPLIN, C 1993. The Failings of the Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11-7.5.27. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
VAN WEES, H. 2002. Herodotus and the Past. In: BAKKER, E. J., DE JONG, I.J.F. and VAN WEES, H. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden: Brill, 321-349.