The Argument from the Work between Ontological Prerequisites and Teleological Assumptions

PDF (ελληνικά)
Published: Ιουν 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/conatus.16043
Keywords:
work supreme good eudemonia Aristotle belief
Emmanuel Kouklakis
University of Crete
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-4501
Abstract
This paper discusses Aristotle's argument of the "work" or entelecheia, that is being severely challenged today. In particular, it is argued that the argument of the work is based on strong ontological and teleological assumptions, while at the same time it pressuposes a particular metaphysical biology, which today can no longer be accepted. Moreover, the argument of the work, it is claimed, presupposes a nature that defines our goals and identifies the direction ethics should follow.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Betsakos, Vasilios. Soul therefore Life. Athens: Armos, 2007.
Bostock, David. Aristotle's Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Dragona-Monachou, Myrto. Modern Moral Philosophy: The English Thought. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, 1995.
Ferry, Luc, and Jean-Didier Vincent. What is Man? A Discussion between Biology and Philosophy. Translated by Anastasia Karastathi. Athens: Kritiki, 2005.
Gilson, Etienne. Being and Substance. Translated by Thanos Samartzis. Iraklio: University of Crete Press, 2009.
Hughes, J. Gerard. Nicomachean Ethics: A Reader. Translated by Pantelis Golitsis. Athens: Okto, 2012.
Kenny, Antony. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Giannis Dimitrakopoulos. Iraklio: University of Crete Press, 2015.
Kindi, Vaso, and Fotini Zika. “The Nature of Nature.” In Nature in Ecology, edited by Michael Modinos, and Ilias Efthimiopoulos. Athens: Stochastis, 1999.
Kondylis, Panagiotis. The Criticism of Metaphysics to Modern Thought: From Late Middle Ages to the End of the Enlightenment. Athens: Gnosi, 1983.
Kontos, Pavlos. Aristotelian Ethics as and Ontology. Athens: Kritiki, 2000.
Korsgaard, Christine. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Lannstrom, Anna. Loving the Fine: Virtue and Happiness in Artistotle's Ethics. Chicago: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.
Lipourlis, Dimitrios. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Thessaloniki: Zitros, 2006.
Maggini, Golfo. Habermas and the Neo-Aristotelians: The Ethics of Dialogue in Jurgent Habermas and the Challenge of Neo-Aristotelianism. Athens: Patakis, 2006.
Mela, Lia. Alasdair MacIntyre: Ethics between Rules and Virtues. Athens: Papazisis, 2012.
Pelegrinis, Theodosios. The Foundation of Moral Life. Athens: Kardamitsa, 1986.
Pentzopoulou-Valala, Tereza. Projections on Aristotle. Thessaloniki: Zitros, 1998.
Virvidakis, Stelios, and Tasos Karakatsanis. “Contemporary Virtue Ethics and Aristotelian Ethics.“ Appendix to Philosophy 8 (2009): 183-217.