Bioethics and Hereditary Genetic Modifications

Published: Jan 11, 2019
genetics hereditary genetic modifications controversies science freedom responsibility bioethics pluriperspectiveness
Zeljko Kaludjerovic
Significant breakthroughs in genetic research promoted by the human genome project, advances in molecular biology and new reproductive technologies have improved the understanding and the possibility of genetic interventions as a potential medication for diseases caused by differentiated disorders, especially those that originated in irregularities in individual genes. The progress achieved in contemporary studies has created the likelihood that the man has the technical capacity to modify the genes that will be transmitted to the next generations as well. These are the so-called hereditary genetic modifications, i.e. any biomedical interventions which could be expected to transform the genome which a person could transfer to their offspring. The author analyses in this paper why even the hints of transformations of genes that will be passed on to future generations cause deep bioethical, theological, legal and political debates and controversies. He also believes that in the era of rapid strengthening of the social and technical and technological effects of science, it is very important that scientists, in their perceptions and insights, which particularly in the field of humanities, do not have the character of value beliefs, do not go below the achieved civilization standards of ethical and moral culture and to reflect on different themes with due care and awareness of the dilemmas that they can encounter in their professional work. An adequate interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and pluriperspective approach, as well as the awareness of the essential compatibility of scientific freedom and responsibility, should ultimately result in a different and more sophisticated attitude of the scientists themselves to the possibilities of their own discipline and the significance of its effects.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Zeljko Kaludjerovic, University of Novi Sad
Associate Professor
AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1975. Accessed September 5, 2018.
Aristotel. O delovima životinja. In O delovima životinja. O kretanju životinja. O hodu životinja. Beograd: PAIDEIA, 2011.
Aristotel. O nebu. In O nebu. O postajanju i propadanju. Beograd: PAIDEIA, 2009.
Aristotel. Politika. Zagreb: Liber, 1988.
Bonitz, H. Index aristotelicus, vol. 5. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1975.
Chapman, A. R. Unprecedented Choices: Religious Ethics at the Frontiers of Science. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1999.
Čović, A. “Biotička zajednica kao temelj odgovornosti za ne-ljudska živa bića”. In Od nove medicinska etike do integrativne bioetike, edited by A. Čović, and N. Gosić, L. Tomašević. Zagreb: PERGAMENA / Hrvatsko bioetičko društvo, 2009.
Derrida, J., and D. Wills, “The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow)”. Critical Inquiry, Vol. 28, no. 2 (2002): 369-418.
Diklić, V., M. Kosanović, J. Nikoliš, and S. Dukić. Biologija sa humanom genetikom. Beograd: Grafopan, 2001.
Đelić, N., and Z. Stanimirović. Principi genetike. Beograd: Elit Medica, 2004.
Galton, F. Hereditary Genius. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific, 2001.
Heisenberg, W. Physics and Beyond. New York, Evanston, and London: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1971.
Husserl, E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Jahr, F. “Reviewing the Ethical Relations of Humans Towards Animals and Plants”. In Fritz Jahr and the Foundations of Global Bioethics. The Future of Integrative Bioethics, edited by A. Muzur, and H.-M. Sass. Berlin, Münster, Wien, Zürich, London: Lit Verlag, 2012.
Jonas, H. Princip odgovornosti. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša, 1990.
Kaluđerović, Ž. Helensko poimanje pravde. Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad: I. k. Z. Stojanovića, 2010.
Kaluđerović, Ž. Presokratsko razumevanje pravde. Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad: I. k. Z. Stojanovića, 2013.
Kaluđerović, Ž. “Pretpostavke nastanka morala”. Bošnjačka pismohrana.In Zbornik radova Simpozija, „Gdje je nestao – moral“, Svezak 15, broj 42-43 (2016): 135-147.
Kant, I. Critique of Practical Reason. Accessed September 20, 2018.
Kant, I. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002.
Lappé, M. “Ethical Issues in Manipulating the Human Germ Line”. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16, no. 6, (1991): 621-639.
Marcuse, H. One-Dimensional Man. London: Taylor Francis Ltd, 2002.
Marinković, D., N. Tucić, and V. Kekić. Genetika. Beograd: Naučna knjiga, 1985.
Novaković, I. “Tehnologija rekombinovane DNK i genetičko inženjerstvo. Testovi hibridizacije, molekularna citogenetika, PCR”. Last modified October, 2004.
Platon. Parmenid. Beograd: Kultura, 1959.
Platon. Teetet i Fileb. Zagreb: Naprijed, 1979.
“Recommendation 934 on Genetic Engineering”. Texts Adopted by the Assembly, 33rd Ordinary Session, Third part, January 25-29, 1982. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe, 1982.
Reich, W. T. “Introduction”. In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, edited by W. T. Reich. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1995.
Sloterdijk, P. Critique of Cynical Reason. Minneapolis London: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed September 20, 2018.
The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. Accessed September 18, 2018.
“The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”. Accessed September 10, 2018.
“Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights”. Accessed September 16, 2018.
“Ustav Republike Srbije”, Beograd: Kanc. za sarad. s med. Vlade Republike Srbije, 2006.
Weizsäcker, C. F. von. Die Verantwortung der Wissenschaft im Atomzeitalter. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.
“Zakon o zdravstvenoj zaštiti”. Accessed September 20, 2018.
Zimmerman, B. K. “Human Germ Line Therapy: The Case for Its Development and Use”. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16, no. 6 (1991): 593-612.