“We Live in the Ruins of Christendom”: Bioethics in a Post-Engelhardtian Age


Published: Dec 31, 2018
Keywords:
Engelhardt Bioethics Christian bioethics common morality post-Engelhardtian age
Claudia Paganini
Abstract
Hugo Tristram Engelhardt Jr. is a philosopher and a physician who has devoted all his life and all his creative power to developing and promoting a Christian bioethics. At the same time, the American is a personality who polarizes and has received euphoric praise on the one hand and malicious criticism on the other.  This has already been the case during his lifetime and will presumably remain so even after his death, which we wish to commemorate here. In the following contribution I intend to investigate why Engelhardt provokes so different reactions in the scientific community, and I will try to bring closer together the two seemingly irreconcilable parties of Engelhardt admirers and Engelhardt critics. I will do this by focusing on the two most controversial aspects of his research, his critique of the status quo and his concept of an independent Christian bioethics.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ach, Johann S. and Runtenberg, Christa. Bioethik. Disziplin und Diskurs. Zur Selbstaufklärung angewandter Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2003.
Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 20096.
Birnbacher, Dieter. Analytische Einführung in die Ethik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007².
Borchers, Dagmar. Die neue Tugendethik. Schritt zurück im Zorn? Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, 2001.
Engelhardt JR, H. Tristram. The Foundation of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 1996².
Engelhardt JR, H. Tristram. The Foundations of Christian Bioethics. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, 2000.
Engelhardt JR, H. Tristram. “Beyond the Principles of Bioethics: Facing the consequences of Fundamental Moral Disagreement”. Ethic@ 11, no. 1 (2012): 13-31.
Gert, Bernard. Morality. Its Nature and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Gert, Bernard and Culver, Charles M. and Clouser, K. Danner. Bioethics. A Return to Funda-mentals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Halbig, Christoph. Praktische Gründe und die Realität der Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann, 2007.
Hare, Richard M. Essays on the Moral Concepts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
Heinrichs, Bert. Forschung am Menschen. Elemente einer ethischen Theorie biomedizinischer Humanexperimente. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.
Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik. Moralisches Wissen. Grundriss einer reliabilistischen Moral-epistemologie. Münster: Mentis Verlag, 2013.
Honneth, Axel. Verdinglichung: Eine anerkennungstheoretische Studie. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2005².
Honneth, Axel. Das Recht auf Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011.
Löffler, Winfried. “Two Kinds of ‘Christian Philosophy’”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5, no. 2 (2013): 111-127.
Parfit, Derek. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Schockenhoff, Eberhard. Ethik des Lebens. Grundlagen und neue Herausforderungen. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2013².
Schöndorf, Harald. „Prinzip“. In: Philosophisches Wörterbuch, edited by Harald Schöndorf and Walter Brugger, S. 375-377. München: Verlag Karl Alber, 2010.
Zimmermann-Acklin, Markus. Bioethik in theologischer Perspektive. Grundlagen, Methoden, Berichte. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2010².