Euthanasia: Promoter of Autonomy or Supporter of Biopower?

PDF
Published: Jun 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.25088
Keywords:
euthanasia autonomy biopower Foucault life heterodetermination
Lydia Tsiakiri
King's College, United Kingdom
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5768-1770
Abstract

The medical developments and their subsequent influence on the duration of human life have brought in the limelight various moral questions. The pathological conditions do not constitute anymore the decisive causes of death, whereas an ascending number of people suffer more by being maintained in life. In this reality, the euthanasia debate seems more apropos than ever. The following article examines the aforementioned issue through the supportive argument of autonomy in contrast to a Foucauldian approach. In essence, based on the Kantian concept of autonomy, several scholars have advocated in favor of the legalization of euthanasia in order that our ability to define not only the course of our life and its duration, but also the way of our death is ensured. However, on the other side, a Foucauldian approach of the issue seems to be equally worth cited and taken into consideration. In accordance with that, the domination of Foucault's concept of biopower would deterministically imply that our choices are totally determined by a form of power that targets at the absolute control over our lives through medicine and legislation. In such a context, euthanasia could not constitute a promoter of autonomy. On the contrary, it would contribute to the absolute escalation of the governmental power that would be imposed on every inch of our lives being exclusively interested in its own prosperity!

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Lydia Tsiakiri, King's College, United Kingdom

Bioethics and Society

References
Bazu, Marina. “Biopolitics or the Legislation of Life: A Foucauldian Analysis.” MA diss., Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2006.
Boutlas, George. “Bioethics as the ‘Third Culture’: Integrating Science and Humanities, Preventing ‘Normative Violence.’” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (2018): 9-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/conatus.16011.
Cooley, Dennis R. “A Kantian Moral Duty for the Soon-to-be Demented to Commit Suicide.” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 6 (2007): 37-44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160701347478.
Cuerda, Esther. “Medicine and State Violence.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2 (2019): 245-262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.20901.
Dillon, Robin S. “Respect.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/respect/.
Foucault, Michel. Society Must Be Defended. Translated by David Macey. New York: Picador, 2003.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816653-57.
Hill, Thomas E. Autonomy and Self-Respect. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609237.
Kubiak, E. Anna. “Assisted Dying in the Context of Biopower.” Anthropological Notebooks 21, no.1 (2015): 23-35.
Lindsay, Anne Hall. “Death, Power, and the Body: A Bio-political Analysis of Death and Dying.” MA diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2007.
Mackenzie, Catriona. “Autonomy.” In Routledge Companion to Bioethics, edited by John D. Arras, Elizabeth Fenton, and Rebecca Kukla, 277-290. New York: Routledge, 2014.
McDorman, Todd F. “Controlling Death: Bio-Power and the Right-to-Die Controversy.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2, no. 3 (2005): 257-279. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420500198571.
O’Neill, Onora. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/philinquiry2003251/224.
Papadaki, Lina. Issues of Moral Philosophy and Bioethics: Kantian Approaches. Athens: Nisos, 2017 [in Greek].
Pavelich, Andrew. “Is it Possible to be Better Off Dead? An Epicurean Analysis of Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 5, no. 2 (2020): 115-132. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.24400.
Porteri, Corinna. “Advance Directives as a Tool to Respect Patients’ Values and Preferences: Discussion on the Case of Alzheimer’s Disease.” BMC Medical Ethics 19, no. 1 (2018): 1-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0249-6.
Prado, G. Carlos. “Foucauldian Ethics and Elective Death.” Journal of Medical Humanities 24, no. 3 (2003): 203-211. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026054219235.
Protopapadakis, Evangelos D. “The ‘Right to Die’ Revisited.” In Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference „Bioethics – The Sign of a New Era,” edited by Dejan Donev, 53-65. Skopje: Center for Integrative Bioethics, 2020.
Protopapadakis, Evangelos D. “Why Letting Die Instead of Killing? Choosing Active Euthanasia on Moral Grounds.” In Proceedings of the 23rd World Congress of Philosophy, Volume 3, edited by Konstantinos Boudouris, 85-90. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp232018394.
Protopapadakis, Evangelos D. From Dawn till Dusk: Bioethical Insights into the Beginning and the End of Life. Berlin: Logos Verlag, 2019.
Ryan Anne, Mandy Morgan, and Antonia Lyons. “The Problem with Death: Towards a Genealogy of Euthanasia.” In Refereed Proceedings of Doing Psychology: Manawatu Doctoral Research Symposium 2011, edited by Robbie Busch, and Ann Rogerson, 43-48. Palmerston North: Massey University, 2011.
Ryan, Anne Beryl. “Making Sense of Euthanasia: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Death and Dying.” PhD diss., Massey University, 2014.
Savulescu, Julian, and Evangelos D. Protopapadakis. “‘Ethical Minefields’ and the Voice of Common Sense: A Discussion with Julian Savulescu.” Conatus - Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 1 (2019): 125-133. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.19712.
van der Haak, Donovan. “Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 6, no. 1 (2021): 159-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.24316.