Spinoza’s Conatus: A Teleological Reading of Its Ethical Dimension

PDF
Published: Dec 28, 2021
Updated: 2021-12-28
Versions:
2021-12-28 (2)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.25661
Keywords:
conatus humanistic Spinoza essentialist teleology ethicality objectivistic
Neşe Aksoy
Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-4350
Abstract

In this article I examine how a teleological (or purposive) reading of Spinoza’s conatus shapes the ethical framework of his philosophy. I first introduce Spinoza’s criticism of teleology and argue contra many critics that Spinoza has a mild approach to human teleology. On the basis of this idea, I develop the claim that the human conatus includes purposive elements such that it is envisioned as a purposive being that is oriented towards the adequate knowledge of Nature or God, the conceptions of wisdom, love and joy and the notion of an ideal human nature. From the teleological reading of human conatus, I draw the conclusion that Spinoza’s ethics is inclusive of objective, humanistic, and essentialist elements in the sense that it situates human agents as directed towards ethical ends to be pursued through their conative activity. In this sense, throughout this paper, I take issue with the anti-teleological reading of conatus that is predominantly related to the subjectivistic, anti-humanistic, and non-essentialist interpretation of Spinoza’s ethics. In doing so, I argue that Spinoza’s ethics is not entirely free from objective, humanistic and essentialist elements, by putting a particular emphasis on the distinguishing character of the purposive essence of his human conatus.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. Edited by Lisa Jardine-Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Bennett, Jonathan. “Teleology and Spinoza’s Conatus.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983): 143-160.
Bennett, Jonathan. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1984.
Boundas, Constantin V. Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
Carriero, John. “Conatus.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Yitzhak Y. Melamed, 142-168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Carriero, John. “Spinoza on Final Causality.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy: Volume 2, edited by Daniel Garber and Steven Nadler, 105-148. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Carriero, John. “Conatus and Perfection in Spinoza.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXXV (2011): 69-92.
Cook, Thomas. “Conatus: A Pivotal Doctrine at the Center of the Ethics.” In Spinoza’s Ethics, edited by Michael Hampe, Ursula Renz, and Robert Schnepf, 147-166. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011.
Curley, Edwin. Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.
Curley, Edwin, and P. F. Moreau, eds. Spinoza: Issues and Directions: The Proceedings of the Chicago Spinoza Conference. Leiden and New York: Brill, 1990.
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Robert Hurley. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Book, 1988.
Descartes, Rene. The Principles of Philosophy. Translated by John Veitch. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing, 2010.
Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by Michael Moriarty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Garrett, Don. “Spinoza’s Conatus Argument.” In Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy, edited by Don Garrett, 352-390. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Garrett, Don. “Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, edited by Rocco J. Gennaro and Charles Huenemann, 310-336. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Hübner, Karolina. “Spinoza’s Unorthodox Metaphysics of the Will.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, edited by Michael Della Rocca, 343-369. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Lin, Martin. “Teleology and Human Action in Spinoza.” The Philosophical Review 115, no. 3 (2006): 317-354.
Lord, Beth. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Edinburgh Philosophical Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.
Manning, Richard N. “Spinoza, Thoughtful Teleology and the Causal Significance of Content.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by Olli Koistinen and John Biro, 182-209. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Teleology in Jewish Philosophy.” In Teleology: A History, edited by J. K. McDonough, 123-149. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Spinoza’s Anti-Humanism: An Outline.” In The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation, edited by Carlos Fraenkel, Dario Perinetti, and Justin Smith, 147-166. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
Nadler, Steven. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Spinoza, Benedictus. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Vol. 1. Edited and translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.
Spinoza, Benedictus. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Vol. 2. Edited and translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2016.
Steinberg, Justin. “Striving, Happiness and the Good: Spinoza as Follower and Critic of Hobbes.” In A Companion to Hobbes, edited by Marcus P. Adams, 431-447. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2022.
Viljanen, Valtteri. Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Viljanen, Valtteri. “Spinoza’s Essentialist Model of Causation.” Inquiry 51, no. 4 (2008): 412-437.
Youpa, Andrew. The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Spinoza and Other Heretics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.