Aristotle and Aristoxenus on Effort


Published: Dec 28, 2021
Keywords:
effort conatus geometrical order self-awareness consciousness ancient Greek music musicology
John Robert Bagby
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-2062
Abstract
The discussions of conatus – force, tendency, effort, and striving – in early modern metaphysics have roots in Aristotle’s understanding of life as an internal experience of living force. This paper examines the ways that Spinoza’s conatus is consonant with Aristotle on effort. By tracking effort from his psychology and ethics to aesthetics, I show there is a conatus at the heart of the activity of the ψυχή that involves an intensification of power in a way which anticipates many of the central insights of early modern and 20th century European philosophy. The first section outlines how Aristotle’s developmental conception of the soul as geometrically ordered lays the foundation for his understanding of effort. The developmental series of powers of the soul are analogous to the series of shapes in mathematics. The second section links the striving of the soul to the gradual acquisition of virtues as a directed activity unifying multiplicity. The third examines the paradigm of self-awareness that Aristotelian effort involves. In the final section I show how ancient Greek theories of music were founded on the experience of striving. The “nature” of music is defined by Aristoxenus, and Theophrastus, in relation to the passion and intentionality of the soul. The geometrical order, as a synthesis of elements in geometry, music, or ethics, is a generative process in which past elements are retained and reintegrated in later stages of development. It requires effort to think geometrically, and the progress of knowledge itself is an integral aspect of all effort. Effort is the lived and self-aware cause which, moving step by step in an orderly and deliberate way, grows and advances upon itself. For both Spinoza and Aristotle, effort is the immanent intelligence which accomplishes what is in the purview of its understanding. Thus, will, in this conception of effort, is not something we already possess innately, but emerges gradually by an effort aimed at improvement.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
John Robert Bagby, Boston College
PhD Candidate Philosophy
References
Aristotle. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press, 1999.
Aristotle. Aristotle’s On the Soul; and, On Memory and Recollection. Translated by Joe Sachs. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press, 2001.
Aristotle. Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Translated by Hippocrates G. Apostle. Grinnell, IA: Peripatetic Press, 1981.
Aristotle. Art of Rhetoric. Translated by John Henry Freese. Cambridge, ΜΑ; London: Harvard University Press, 1929.
Aristotle. Athenian Constitution; Eudemian Ethics; Virtues and Vices. Loeb Classical Library 285. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
Aristotle. De anima. Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 2017.
Aristotle. Eudemian Ethics. Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis, IN; Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2021.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. Loeb Classical Library 271. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis; Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company, 2016.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Loeb Classical Library 73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Focus Philosophical Library. Newbury, MA: Focus Pub/RPullins, 2002.
Aristotle. On the Soul; Parva Naturalia; On Breath. Loeb Classical Library 288. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
Aristotle. Parts of Animals; Movement of Animals; Progression of Animals. Loeb Classical Library 323. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
Aristotle. Poetics. Edited and translated by Stephen Halliwell, W. H. Fyfe, and Doreen C. Innes. Revised by Donald Russell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Aristotle. Politics. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 264. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932.
Aristotle. Posterior Analytics Topica. Loeb Classical Library 391. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
Aristotle. Protrepticus: A Reconstruction of Aristotle’s Lost Dialogue. Translated by D. S. Hutchison, and Monte Ransom Johnson, 2017. http://www.protrepticus.info/protr2017x20.pdf.
Aristotle. Rhetoric. Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis; Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2018.
Aristoxenus. Harmonika Stoicheia: The Harmonics of Aristoxenus (Elements of Harmony). Translated by Henry Stewart Macran. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1902.
Barker, Andrew. “Theophrastus and Aristoxenus: Confusions in Musical Metaphysics.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47, no. 1 (2004): 101-117.
Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell. New York: The Modern Library, 1944.
Bernet, Rudolf, and Sarah Allen. Force, Drive, Desire. A Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 2020.
Corkum, P. “Attention, Perception, and Thought in Aristotle.” Dialogue 49, no. 2 (2010): 199-222.
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Ferrari, G. R. F. “Aristotle on Musical Catharsis and the Pleasure of a Good Story.” Phronesis 64, no. 2 (2019): 117-171.
Fóti V. M. “Merleau-Ponty’s Vertical Genesis and the Aristotelian Powers of the Soul.” In Phenomenology: Japanese and American Perspectives. Contributions to Phenomenology, edited by B. C. Hopkins, 39-51. Dordrecht: Springer, 1998.
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time: A Translation of Sein Und Zeit. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996.
Kosman, L. A. “Perceiving That We Perceive: On the Soul III, 2.” The Philosophical Review 84, no. 4 (1975): 499-519.
Leibniz, G. W. G.W. Leibniz’s Monadology: An Edition for Students. Translated by Nicholas Rescher. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991.
Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Massie, Pascal. “Touching, Thinking, Being: The Sense of Touch in Aristotle’s De anima and Its Implications.” Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 17 (2013): 74-101.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.
Plato. Republic. Translated by Joe Sachs. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing, 2007.
Ravaisson, Felix. Essai Sur la Métaphysique D’Aristote. A l’imprimerie royale, 1837.
Ravaisson, Felix. Félix Ravaisson: Selected Essays. Edited by Mark Sinclair. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
Sorabji, Richard. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200-600 AD: Vol. 1 Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.
Spinoza, B. A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works. Edited by E. Curley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Staufer, Amanda. “The Unifying Strands: Formalism and Gestalt Theory in the Musical Philosophies of Aristoxenus, Descartes, and Meyer.” Musical Offerings 9, no. 1 (2018): 31-41.
Trott, Adriel M. “Does It Matter? Material nature and Vital Heat in Aristotle’s Biology.” In Contemporary Encounters With Ancient Metaphysics, edited by Abraham Jacob Greenstine, and Ryan J. Johnson, 158-178. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
van Ophuijsen, J. M., and Marlein van Raalte. Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1997.
Walker, Matthew D. “Aristotle, Isocrates, and Philosophical Progress.” History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 23, no. 1 (2020): 197-224.