Political Realism in the Chinese Warring States Period and the European Renaissance: Han Fei and Machiavelli


Published: Jun 30, 2023
Keywords:
ruler statesmanship human nature Political Realism Legalism Daoism morality laws aristocracy "two handles" non-action form of governance wu wei
Panagiotis Kallinikos
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-830X
Abstract

Τhis article presents the basic similarities and differences between the Political Realism of Niccolò Machiavelli in the 15th century A.D., i.e. during the Renaissance in Europe, and the Chinese Legalism of Han Fei in the 3rd century B.C., during the Warring States period. It could be supported that Political Realism and Political Legalism share numerous elements that bring them closer rather than apart. The fundamental works written by the main representatives of these two political doctrines, namely the Prince by Machiavelli and the Han Feizi by Han Fei, are addressed to living political leaders, specifically Lorenzo de' Medici and the governor of the Hann state in the Warring States historical period (476-221 B.C.) respectively. Both philosophical movements emphasize the importance of statesmanship in a ruler and reject the idealistic approach to politics. Machiavelli and Han Fei do not promote a cruel leadership, but straightforwardly condemn morality alone as insufficient for the establishment of a state. Both of them try to replace previous models of virtuous political philosophy – that of classical antiquity in the case of Machiavelli and that of Confucianism in the case of Han Fei – with a new notion of political correctness which takes into account the urgency of the moment and ensures political stability.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Panagiotis Kallinikos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Philosophy

References
Althusser, Louis. Machiavelli and Us. Edited by Francois Matheron. Translated by Gregory Elliot. London, and New York: Verso Books, 2001.
Bai, Shouyi. An Outline History of China. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1982.
Benner, Erica. “The Necessity to Be Not-Good: Machiavelli’s Two Realisms.” In Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict, edited by David Johnston, Nadia Urbinati, and Camila Vergara, 164-185. Chicago, and London: Chicago University Press, 2017.
Benner, Erica. Machiavelli’s Ethics. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009.
Benner, Erica. Machiavelli’s Prince-A New Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Birley, Antony. Septimius Severus. London, and New York: Routledge, 1999.
Brown, Alison. “Rethinking the Renaissance in the Aftermath of Italy’s Crisis.” In The Short Oxford History of Italy – Italy in the Age of Renaissance 1300-1550, edited by John M. Najmy, 247-266. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Buckley Ebey, Patricia. The Cambridge Illustrated History of Ancient China. Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Chan, Wing-Tsit. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.
Cheng, Anne. Histoire de la pensée chinoise. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 2015.
Cheng, Chung-Ying, “The Origins of Chinese Philosophy.” In Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, edited by Brian Carr, and Indira Mahalingam, 445-480. London, and New York: Routledge, 2005.
Chong, Kim-Chong. “Classical Confucianism (II): Meng Zi and Xun Zi.” In History of Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bo Mou, 189-208. Routledge, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203002865.
Coleman, Janet. A History of Political Thought-From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Oxford, and Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2000.
Duyvendak, Jean Luis Lodewijk. “Études de philosophie chinoise.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’ Etranger 110 (1930) : 372-417.
Galvany, Albert. “Beyond the Rules of Rules: The Foundations of Sovereign Power in Han Feizi.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, edited by Paul R. Goldin, 87-106. Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer, 2013.
Goldin, Paul R. “Han Fei’s Doctrine of Self-Interest.” Asian Philosophy 11, no. 3 (2001): 151-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552360120116900.
Granet, Michel. La pensée chinoise. Paris: Editions Albin Michel, 1968.
Han Fei Tzu, Basic Writings. Translated by Burton Watson. New York, and London: Columbia University Press, 1964.
Harris, Eirik Lang. “Han Fei on the Problem of Morality.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, edited by Paul R. Goldin, 107-134. Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer, 2013.
He, Peng. “The Difference of Chinese Legalism and Western Legalism.” Frontiers of Law in China 6, no. 4 (2011): 645-669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-011-0148-y.
Heraclitus, Fragments – A Text and a Translation with a Commentary. Translated by T. M. Robinson. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: Toronto University Press, 1991.
Ho, Norman P. “The Legal Thought of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty (618-907).” Frontiers of Law in China 12, no. 4 (2017): 584-625.
Hughes, Ernest R. Chinese Philosophy in Classical Times. London: J.M Dents and Sons, 1942.
Ip, Eric C. “The Idea of Law in Classical Chinese Legalist Jurisprudence.” Global Jurist 9, no. 4 (2009): 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1934-2640.1311.
Lay, Karyn L. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Lewis, Mark Edward. “Warring States Political History.” In The Cambridge Ancient History of China – From the Origins of Civilization to 221 B.C., edited by Michael Loewe, and Edward L. Shaughnessy, 587-650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521470308.011.
Long, Antony Arthur, and Despina Vertzagia. “Antiquity Revisited: A Discussion with Antony Arthur Long.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 5, no. 1, (2020): 111-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.23324.
Lu, Xing. “The Theory of Persuasion in Han Fei Tzu and its Impact on Chinese Communication Behaviours.” Howard Journal of Communications 5, nos. 1-2 (1993): 108-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10646179309361654.
Lundahl, Bertil. “Han Fei Zi – The Man and the Work.” PhD diss. Stockholm: Stockholm University – Institute of Oriental Languages, 1992.
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. Translated by Harvey Claflin Mansfield. Chicago, and London: Chicago University Press, 19982.
Mallett, Michael. “Politics and Society 1250-1600.” In The Oxford Illustrated History of Italy, edited by Georges Homes, 57-85. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Mansfield, Harvey Claflin. Machiavelli’s Virtue. Chicago, and London: Chicago University Press, 1996.
Mantzanas, Michail. “The Concept of Moral Conscience in Ancient Greek Philosophy.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 5, no. 2 (2020): 65-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.23148.
Nivison, David Shepherd. “The Classical Philosophical Writings.” In The Cambridge Ancient History of China - From the Origins of Civilization to 221 B.C., edited by Michael Loewe, and Edward L.Shaughnessy, 745-812. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Pines, Yuri. “Submerged by Absolute Power: The Ruler’s Predicament in the Han Feizi.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, edited by Paul R. Goldin, 67-86. Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer, 2013.
Plato, Protagoras. Translated by Christopher Charles Whinston Taylor. Oxford, and New York: Clarendon Press, 1992 (revised edition).
Plato, The Republic. Edited by Giovanni R. F. Ferrari. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Pocock, John Greville Agard. “Ritual, Language, Power: An Essay on the Apparent Political Meanings of Ancient Chinese Philosophy.” Political Science 16, no. 1 (1964): 3-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/003231876401600101.
Protopapadakis, Evangelos. “Notions of the Stoic Value Theory in Contemporary Debates: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.” Zbornik Matice srpske za klasične studije 11 (2009): 213-221.
Schwartz, Benjamin Isadore. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA, and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985.
Sigwart, Hans-Jorg. “The Logic of Legitimacy: Ethics in Political Realism.” The Review of Politics 75, no. 2 (2013): 407-432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670513000338.
Skinner, Quentin. Machiavelli – A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Steiris, Georgios. “Machiavelli’s Appreciation of Greek Antiquity and the Ideal of Renaissance.” In Renaissance? Perceptions of Continuity and Discontinuity in Europe, edited by Alexander Lee, Pit Péporté, and Harry Schnitker, 81-94. Leiden, and Boston, MA: Brill, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004183346.i-370.12.
Stobart, John Clarke. The Grandeur that was Rome. London: Ballantyne Press, 1912.
Strauss, Leo. Thoughs on Machiavelli. Chicago: The Free Press, 1958.
Tang, Chinghua. The Ruler’s Guide – China’s Greatest Emperor and His Timeless Secrets of Success. New York: Scribner, 2017.
Vatter, Miquel. Machiavelli’s The Prince-A Reader’s Guide. London, and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
Winston, Kenneth. “The Internal Morality of Chinese Legalism.” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (2005): 313-347.
Ying, Zhang, Tao Liming, and Xuan Yao. The Wisdom of Han Feizi. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language University Press, 2010.
Yu-Lan, Fung. A History of Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.
Zuckert, Catherine. Machiavelli’s Politics. Chicago, and London: Chicago University Press, 2017.