Understanding the Concept of Being in general: From Being and Time back to Young Heidegger


Published: Jun 30, 2024
Keywords:
Heidegger being in general Freiburg courses facticity formal indication that-character
Yorgos G. Filippopoulos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1581-0001
Abstract

This paper exhibits a way of understanding Heidegger’s concept of being in general [Sein überhaupt] – the central aim of Being and Time’s questioning – by getting insight into his early years. I argue that the term “being” [Sein] as Heidegger understands it in the early 1920s describes the meaningful relation between humans and the things of their surrounding world which is given to us as a fact. I maintain that Sein überhaupt refers to this fact, i.e., the fact that every particular being is always with a certain meaning for us. I come to this conclusion by exploring (1) Heidegger’s early analysis of Umwelterlebnis, (2) his early description of medieval transcendentia, (3) his critique of formalization and the introduction of formal indication. Lastly, (4) I observe the way Heidegger introduces the concepts of Sein and Sein überhaupt pointing to the simple fact of beings’ being in meaningful relation to us.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Yorgos G. Filippopoulos, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Greece

Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Political Science and History, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece.

References
Babich, Babette. “The ‘New’ Heidegger.” In Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Tziovannis Georgakis and Paul Ennis, 167-187. Frankfurt am Main: Springer, 2015.
Braver, Lee, ed. Division III of Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Unanswered Question of Being. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2015.
Crowell, Steven Galt. Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2001.
Crowell, Steven, and Jeff Malpas, eds. Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.
Dahlstrom, Daniel. “Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications.” Review of Metaphysics 47, no. 4 (1994): 775-795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-014-9302-4.
Denker, Alfred, and Holger Zaborowski, eds. Heidegger und die Logik (Elementa 79). Amsterdam and New York: Editions Rodopi BV, 2006.
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe Band 19. Platon: Sophistes (WS 1924/25), edited by Ingeborg Schüßler. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1992; Plato’s Sophist. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1997.
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe Band 56/57. Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie, edited by Bern Heimbüchel. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1987; Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Translated by Ted Sadler. London: Continuum, 2000.
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe Band 58. Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (WS 1919/20), edited by Hans-Helmuth Gander. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1992.
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe Band 60. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, edited by Matthias Jung and Thomas Regehly. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1995; The Phenomenology of Religious Life. Translated by Matthias Fritsch and Jennifer Gosetti-Ferencei. Bloomington, ΙΝ: Indiana University Press, 2004.
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe Band 61. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung (WS 1921/22), edited by Walter Bröcker and Käte Bröcker-Oltmanns. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1985; Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington, ΙΝ: Indiana University Press, 2001.
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe Band 62. Phänomenologische Interpretation ausgewählter Abhandlungen des Aristoteles zu Ontologie und Logik (SS 1922), edited by Günther Neumann. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2005.
Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. 19. Auflage. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2006; Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.
Kisiel, Theodore. “Das Entstehen des Begriffsfeldes ‘Faktizität’ im Frühwerk Heideggers.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch 4 (1986-1987): 91-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/dj1986-8746.
Kisiel, Theodore. “Kriegsnotsemester 1919: Heidegger’s Hermeneutic Breakthrough.” In The Question of Hermeneutics, edited by Timothy Stapleton, 155-208. Dordrecht: Springer, 1994.
Kisiel, Theodore. The Genesis of Heidegger’s “Being and Time.” Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
Philipse, Herman. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: A Critical Interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Rodríguez, Ramón. La Transformación hermenéutica de la Fenomenología: Una interpretación de la obra temprana de Heidegger. Madrid: Tecnos, 1992.
Sheehan, Thomas. “What, after All, Was Heidegger about?” Continental Philosophy Review 47, nos. 3-4 (2014): 249-274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-014-9302-4.
Sheehan, Thomas. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015.
van Buren, John. The Young Heidegger – Rumor of the Hidden King. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994.
von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm. Hermeneutics and Reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the Concept of Phenomenology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2013.