Responsibility in the Time of Crisis


Published: Jun 30, 2023
Keywords:
crises bioethics responsibility life system subjectivity evolution
Dejan Donev
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-215X
Denko Skalovski
Abstract

One of the crucial questions that this text seeks to answer is whether again it is just one of the current crises of the value system that we can call “western” or it is a definite end of the functioning of a particular system and its hierarchy, whose principle of growth and imperial development is predominantly determined by the economic logic of profit/capitalism and the “infinity” of its progress. The answer implies the return/internalization of positive utopian energies and a new universalist moral optimism (macro ethics) as a dialectical antipode of postmodern “liberal” antihumanism and self-destructive relativism and total nihilism. Moreover, it requires a commitment to the creation/construction of new systems of thinking and acting and great importance of the moral-political responsibility of all social subjects in those new systems of social technology.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Dejan Donev, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, North Macedonia

Professor of Ethics and Bioethics, President of the Center for integrative Bioethics, Faculty of Philosophy, Skopje, North Macedonia

Denko Skalovski, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, North Macedonia

Professor of Philosophy at the Insitute for Gender studies, Faculty of Philosophy, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia

References
Allen, Amy. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbiа University Press, 2016.
Apel, Karl-Otto. Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.
Arendt, Hannah. Human Condition. Chicago, and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Bauman, Zigmund. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
Bloch, Ernst. The Principle of Hope. Translated by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
Davčev, Vladimir. Analitičkata filosofija i “duh-telo” interakcijata. Skopje: AZ-Buki, 2010.
de Chardin, Pierre Teilhard. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1961.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. Mankind Evolving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1962.
Donev, Dejan. “A Thought on the Ethics of Saint Naum’s Miraculousness and on the National Spirit.” Annuaire Faculté De Philosophie Skopje 73 (2020): 23-31.
Donev, Dejan. “The Imperative Responsibility: The Return of Ethics in Science.” Annuaire Faculté De Philosophie Skopje 74 (2021): 23-35.
Donev, Dejan. Voved vo etikata. Skopje: UKIM, 2018.
Fritzhand, Ana, and Dejan Donev. “Between Ego(centr)ism and Cooperation: Would People Become Morally Disengaged or more Altruistic after the Covid-19 Pandemics?” In Practical Ethics – Studies: Medicine and Ethics in Times of Corona, edited by Martin Woesler, and Hans Martin Sass, 411-419. Zurich: LIT Verlag, 2020.
Fromm, Erich. To Have or to Be? New York: Continuum, 2008.
Fromm, Erich. You Shall Be as Gods: A Radical Interpretation of the Old Testament and Its Tradition. New York: Fawcett Premier, 1969.
Habermas, Jürgen, and Niklas Luhmann. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozial technologie? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.
Habermas, Jürgen. Legitimation Crisis. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1975.
Habermas, Jürgen. Theory and Practice. Translated by John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1988.
Honneth, Axel. Die Idee des Sozialismus: Versuch einer Aktualisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag AG, 2015.
Horkheimer, Max. Critique of Instrumental Reason (Radical Thinkers). Translated by Matthew O‘Connell. London: Verso, 2013.
Jonas, Hans. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.
Jonas, Hans. Daz Prinzip Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1979.
Jonas, Hans. Erkentnis und Verantwortung: Gespräch mit Ingo Herman. Götingen: Lamuv Verlag, 1991.
Jonas, Hans. Macht oder Ohmacht der Subjektivität: Das Leib-Seele-Problem im Vorfeld des Prinzips Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1981.
Jonas, Hans. Organismus und Freiheit. Ansätze zu einer philosophischen Biologie. Götingen: Sammlung Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1973.
Jonas, Hans. Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Zur Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1987.
Luhmann, Niklas. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt : Suhrkamp Verlag, 2018.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Morin, Edgar. L’ Homme et la Mort. Paris: Points, 1976.
Pieper, Annemarie, ed. Geschichte der neueren Ethik 1-2. Tübingen, and Basel: Francke Verlag, 1992.
Plessner, Helmuth. The Levels of Organic Life and the Human: Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology. Edited by Phillip Honenberger. Translated by Millay Hyatt. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.
Šarčević, Abdulah. “Etika odgovornosti u krizi znanstveno-tehničke civilizacije. Makroetika Hansa Jonasa.” In Hans Jonas, Princip odgovornost. Translated by Slobodan Novakov. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša, 1990.
Simonovska, Suzana, and Denko Skalovski. Etikata i rodot. Skopje: Filozofski fakultet, 2012.
Simonovska, Suzana. “Ethical Dimensions of Genetic Engineering.” Annuaire Faculté De Philosophie Skopje (2006): 669-678.
Skalovski, Denko. Vo prvo lice ednina (mal ličen kulturološki rečnik) - Tom 1, od Ang. do Kult. Skopje: Az-Buki, 2010.
Skalovski, Denko. Vo prvo lice ednina (mal ličen kulturološki rečnik) - Tom 2, od Liber. do Psiho. Skopje: Az-Buki, 2012.
Zinovjev, Aleksandar. Velika prekretnica: kritika zapadne hegemonije. Beograd: Naš dom/L’Age D’Homme, 1999.
Žižek, Slavoj. Pandemic!: COVID-19 Shakes the World. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2020.