Just War contra Drone Warfare


Front cover of Conatus 8, no. 2
Published: Dec 31, 2023
Keywords:
just war theory drones proportionality principle moral equivalence of combatants Michael Walzer Harry Van der Linden Ronald Dworkin
Joshua M. Hall
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0762-6375
Abstract

In this article, I present a two-pronged argument for the immorality of contemporary, asymmetric drone warfare, based on my new interpretations of the just war principles of “proportionality” and “moral equivalence of combatants” (MEC). The justification for these new interpretations is that drone warfare continues to this day, having survived despite arguments against it that are based on traditional interpretations of just war theory (including one from Michael Walzer). On the basis of my argument, I echo Harry Van der Linden’s call for “an international treaty banning all weaponized UAV [uninhabited aerial vehicles].”

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
  • Categories
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Braun, Megan, and Daniel R. Brunstetter. “Rethinking the Criterion for Assessing CIA-Targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality, and Jus ad Vim.” Journal of Military Ethics 12, no. 4 (2013): 304-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2013.869390.
Burkhardt, Todd. “Justified Drone Strikes are Predicated on R2P Norms.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 29, no. 2 (2016): 167-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap201612047.
Chamayou, Grégoire. A Theory of the Drone. Paris: The New Press, 2013.
Coeckelbergh, Mark. “Drones, Information Technology, and Distance: Mapping the Moral Epistemology of Remote Fighting.” Ethics and Information Technology 15, no. 2 (2013): 87-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9313-6.
Death Penalty Information Center. “The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides.” June 4, 1998. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-penalty-black-and-white-who-lives-who-dies-who-decides.
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2013.
Galliott, Jai C. “Closing with Completeness: The Asymmetric Drone Warfare Debate.” Journal of Military Ethics 11, no. 4 (2012): 353-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2012.760245.
Gregory, Derek. “Drone Geographies.” Radical Philosophy Review 183 (2014): 7-19.
Hall, Joshua M. “Logical Theatrics, or Floes on Flows: Translating Quine with the Shins.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2017). doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.661.
Hodgson, Godfrey. “Ronald Dworkin Obituary.” The Guardian. February 14, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/feb/14/ronald-dworkin.
McMahan, Jeff. “Targeted Killing: Murder, Combat or Law Enforcement?” In Targeted Killing: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World, edited by Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, and Andrew Altman, 135-155. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646470.003.0006.
Strawser, Bradley Jay. “Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles.” Journal of Military Ethics 9, no. 4 (2010): 342-368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2010.536403.
United Nations. “Preamble.” In The Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. San Francisco, CA: 1945.
van der Linden, Harry. “Arguments against Drone Warfare with a Focus on the Immorality of Remote Control Killing and ‘Deadly Surveillance.’” Radical Philosophy Review 19, no. 2 (2016): 331-358. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev2015121542.
van der Linden, Harry. “Drone Warfare and Just War Theory.” In Drones and Targeted Killing: Legal, Moral, and Geopolitical Issues, edited by Marjorie Cohn, 169-194. Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2015.
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books, 2015.