Progressus as an Explanatory Model: An Anthropological Principle Illustrated by the Russia-Ukraine War

Front cover of Conatus 8, no. 2
PDF
Published: Dec 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35250
Keywords:
Russia-Ukraine war Ukraine-conflict Gewalt Progressus Gewalt-Progressus-Matrix individual and social violence power force
Paul Ertl
National Defence Academy Vienna, Austria
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-7088
Abstract

At the beginning of the Russian Federation’s attack on Ukraine in February 2022, the European Union put up massive resistance, but due to its sudden overload, it was unable to deal with the situation adequately. It was in a state of paralysis for some time. Therefore, five explanatory models for the Russian actions are presented: an offensive, a defensive, a situational, a socio-cultural, and an ideological-historical one. It is then shown that the German term Gewalt, which combines the English terms violence, power, and force ontologically, is best suited to summarize and describe all these models. It is also shown that Gewalt is a neutral, fundamental human concept that can be described as one of the basic driving forces of man. By piercing society, Gewalt constitutes an impulse, a motivation that stimulates and fuels the individual and society in toto. This leads to what we call Progressus, which depends on four variables – group desire, potential means of violence and force, group aims and objectives, as well as group comparison and evaluation. Progressus is inherent in all persons and in all societies. It can be analyzed and managed in a variety of different ways. Combined with the foundation of Gewalt, seen as neutral agent in varying levels of intensity, Progressus forms a matrix for efficient analysis to describe positive and frictional interaction, establishes social relations from friendship up to war; and this between individuals, groups and/or states. How this is possibly implemented in practice is described at the end using an example from the previously presented explanatory models.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
  • Categories
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Agamben, Giorgio. Homo sacer. Die souveräne Macht und das nackte Leben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002.
Baudrillard, Jean. The Spirit of Terrorism and Requiem for the Twin Towers. New York: Verso, 2002.
Bauman, Zygmunt. “Alte und neue Gewalt.” Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung 2, no. 1 (2000): 28-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.11576/jkg-5544.
Bellinger, John B. III. “How Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Violates International Law.” Council on Foreign Relations, February 28, 2022. https://www.cfr.org/article/how-russias-invasion-ukraine-violates-international-law.
Benjamin, Walter. “Critique of Violence.” In Walter Benjamin – Selected Writings Vol 1 (1913-1926), edited by Marcus Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, 236-252. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1996.
Bruneau, Emile, and Nour Kteily. “The Enemy as Animal: Symmetric Dehumanization during Asymmetric Warfare.” PLoS ONE 12, no. 7 (2017): e0181422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181422.
Ertl, Paul. Gewalt-Herrschaft-Totalität. Eine strukturanalytische Studie zur Globalisierung der Gewalt in der Postmoderne. PhD diss., Alpe-Adria-University of Klagenfurt, 2010. https://netlibrary.aau.at/obvuklhs/download/pdf/2410752?originalFilename=true.
Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power.” In Power, The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984, edited by James D. Faubion, translated by Robert Hurley et al., 326-348. New York: New Press, 2000.
Fritsch, Rüdiger von. “Ukraine-Krieg für Putin ‘letztes Mittel.ʼ” ZDF Heute, June 20, 2022. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/putin-ziele-motivation-ukraine-krieg-russland-100.html.
Gruyter, Caroline de. “The West Fell into Putin’s Trap.” Foreign Policy, January 24, 2022. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/putin-ziele-motivation-ukraine-krieg-russland-100.html.
Heinemann-Grüder, Andreas. “Außenpolitische Denkschulen und der Ukrainekonflikt.” In Lehren aus dem Ukrainekonflikt: Krisen vorbeugen, Gewalt verhindern, edited by Andreas Heinemann-Grüder, Claudia Crawford, and Tim B. Peters, 11-30. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2023.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1914.
Martin, Murphy. “Understanding Russia’s Concept for Total War in Europe.” The Heritage Foundation, September 12, 2016. https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/understanding-russias-concept-total-war-europe#.
McKew, Molly K. “The Gerasimov Doctrine – It’s Russia’s New Chaos Theory of Political Warfare. And it’s Probably being Used on You.” POLITICO Magazine, September/October 2017. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/09/05/gerasimov-doctrine-russia-foreign-policy-215538/.
Mearsheimer, John J. “Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault.” Foreign Affairs 93, no. 5 (2014): 77-89.
Minzarari, Dumitru. “Failing to Deter Russia’s War against Ukraine: The Role of Misperceptions.” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Comment 33 (2022). doi: https://doi.org/10.18449/2022C33.
Powell, Cathleen. “Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine is Illegal under International Law: Suggesting It’s not Is Dangerous.” The Conversation: Academic Rigour, Journalistic Flair, March 15, 2022. https://theconversation.com/russias-invasion-of-ukraine-is-illegal-under-international-law-suggesting-its-not-is-dangerous-179203.
Putin, Vladimir. “Article by Vladimir Putin ‘on the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians.’” President of Russia, July 12, 2021. http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181.
Putin, Vladimir. “Speech of Vladimir Putin at the German Bundestag.” Transcript of the speech, Deutscher Bundestag, September 25, 2001. https://www.bundestag.de/parlament/geschichte/gastredner/putin/putin_wort-244966.
Russel, Bertrand. Power: A New Social Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1938.
Saguy, Tamar, and Michal Reifen-Tagar. “The Social Psychological Roots of Violent Intergroup Conflict.” Nature Reviews Psychology 1 (2022): 577-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00083-7.
Sterio, Milena. “The Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Violations of International Law.” Jurist, July 12, 2022. https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2022/07/Milena-Sterio-Russia-war-crimes-Ukraine/.
von Clausewitz, Carl. On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.
Weber, Max. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, CA: California University Press, 1922.