Führerprinzip or 'I Was Following Orders' in Jus in Bello Era

Front cover of Conatus 8, no. 2
PDF
Published: Dec 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35677
Keywords:
Führerprinzip conscientious objection jus in bello Nuremberg trials Eichmann Rawls Kant Grotius Vitoria
George Boutlas
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1898-2845
Abstract

In June of 1945, the International Military Tribunal (ITM) formed in London, faced the problem of a non-yet existing legal armor for the Nazi crimes. Two new rules were widely accepted there. First, a new category of war crimes, the “crimes against humanity” was legally defined. Second, the ex-ante rejection of the defense line “I was following orders” or Führerprinzip (the principle of the duty to obey every order given by the military leader). In the first part of this paper, I will present in brief, the historical and legal context of the rejection of Führerprinzip as a defense line of the Nazi defendants in Nuremberg trials as also in Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem, where the same legal context was enacted. Next, I will expose a short history of conscientious objection in war ethics and the International Law on Human Rights that supports it. This exposition reveals that objection to criminal orders has the status not only of a right, but also of a duty for the soldiers on either side of the war. In the third part, the Rawlsian view on conscientious objector will be exposed as the meeting point of a broadly Kantian conception of war ethics and the existing International Law frame. In the final part I will present some philosophical aspects of jus in bello theory, as also the critique of its importance, and its contribution to the reification of the moral importance of conscientious objection in wartime and the rejection of Führerprinzip.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
  • Categories
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
George Boutlas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Orthopaedic surgeon

Phd in Bioethics 

References
Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books, 1992.
Babic, Jovan. “Ethics of War and Ethics in War.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 1 (2019), 9-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.19708.
Beck, Lewis W. “Kant and the Right of Revolution.” Journal of the History of Ideas 32, no. 3 (1971): 411-422. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2708355.
Brittain, Vera. Seed of Chaos: What Mass Bombing Really Means. London: New Vision Press, 1944.
Brock, Peter. Pacifism in Europe to 1914. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.
Caygill, Howard. A Kant Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1995.
Grayling, Antony C. Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime? London, Berlin, and New York: Bloomsbury, 2014.
Grodin, Michael A. “Historical Origins of the Nuremberg Code.” In The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation, edited by George J. Annas, and Michael Grodin, 121-144. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070422.003.0008.
Grotius, Hugo. De jure belli ac pacis libri tres. Volume 2: On The Law of War and Peace. Edited by James Brown Scott. Translated by Francis W. Kelsey. Oxford: Clarendon Press; London: Humphrey Milford, 1925.
Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” In Immanuel Kant Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor, 11-22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory, but It Is of no Use in Practice.” In Immanuel Kant Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor, 273-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Kant, Immanuel. “The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Immanuel Kant Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor, 353-604. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
McMahan, Jeff, and David Rodin. “The Ethics of Killing in War.” Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy 114, no. 4 (2004): 693-733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/422400.
Papageorgiou, Konstantinos. War and Justice. Athens: Polis, 2019.
Perley, Sharon, Sev Fluss, Zbigniew Bankowski, and Françoise Simon. “The Nuremberg Code: An International Overview.” In The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation, edited by George J. Annas and Michael Grodin, 149-173. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070422.003.0009.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
Rengger, Nicholas. “The jus in bello in Historical and Philosophical Perspective.” In War: Essays in Political Philosophy, edited by Larry May and Emily Crookston, 30-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840982.003.
United Nations. Human Rights and Conscientious Objection to Military Service. New York: UN Publications, 2012.
Viner, Steve. “The Moral Foundations of the jus ad bellum / jus in bello Distinction.” In Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War theory in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Fritz Allhoff, Nicholas G. Evans, and Adam Henschke, 49-62. New York and London: Routledge, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107164.ch4.
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
Whetham, David. “Military Ethics Education – What Is It, How Should It Be Done, and Why Is It Important?” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023): 759-774. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35160.
Most read articles by the same author(s)