The non-Thomistic Character of Aristotle’s (and Thomas’s) Ethics

PDF
Published: Dec 31, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35995
Keywords:
Aristotle’s ethics Thomas Aquinas’s ethics emotions reason
Joshua Taccolini
Saint Louis University, United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1301-5730
Abstract

Even today, some Thomists follow the Early Modern, Neo-Scholastic tradition in reading Thomas Aquinas’s ethics as an Aristotelian, reason-dominant model in which emotions play a secondary role in the virtuous life. The virtuous person is one for whom reason is superior to and rules over the emotions. Alternatively, Eleonore Stump dissociates Thomas Aquinas’s ethics from Aristotle in an effort to overcome intellectualist interpretation. In this paper, I draw on Eugene Garver’s Aristotle scholarship to offer a reading of Aristotle’s ethics free of its Neoplatonic intellectualist reception in the Thomistic Commentary tradition. In doing so, I support Thomists who see emotivist elements in Thomas Aquinas’s ethics but do not yet see them in Aristotle. For these Thomists, Thomas Aquinas’s ethics will turn out, once again, Aristotelian.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Benziger Brothers, 1947.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Martin Oswald. Prentice Hall, 1999.
Athanassoulis, Nafsika. “Akrasia and the Emotions.” In The Moral Life: Essays in Honor of John Cottingham, edited by Nafsika Athanassoulis and Samantha Vice, 87-110. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Barnes, Jonathan, Malcolm Schofield, and Richard Sorabji, eds. Articles on Aristotle: Volume 2 Ethics and Politics. Duckworth, 1977.
Carrasquillo, Francisco J. Romero, and Hilaire K. Troyer de Romero. “Aquinas on the Inferiority of Woman.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87, no. 4 (2013): 685-710. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq201387452.
Cates, Diana Fritz. Aquinas on the Emotions: A Religious-Ethical Inquiry. Georgetown University Press, 2009.
Decock, Wim, Bart Raymaekers, and Peter Heryman, eds. Neo-Thomism in Action. Leuven University Press, 2021.
Egbekpalu, Purissima Emelda. “Aristotelian Concept of Happiness (Eudaimoia) and its Conative Role in Human Existence: A Critical Evaluation.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 6, no. 2 (2021): 75-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.26924.
Feser, Edward. “Natural Law Ethics and the Revival of Aristotelian Metaphysics.” In Natural Law Ethics, edited by Tom Angier. Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525077.015.
Field, Guy C. The Works of Aristotle: De anima. Translated by John A. Smith. Clarendon Press, 1931.
Finnis, John. “Aquinas’s Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021), edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/aquinas-moral-political/.
Garver, Eugene. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Golcenius, Rudolf. Lexicon philosophicum, quo tanquam Clave Philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Mathäus Becker, 1613.
Hume, David. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Clarendon Press, 1975.
Kahm, Nicholas. Aquinas on Emotion’s Participation in Reason. Catholic University of America Press, 2019.
King, Peter. “Aquinas on the Passions.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory, edited by Scott MacDonald and Eleonore Stump, 101-132. Cornell University Press, 1999.
Lombardo, Nicholas E. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion. Catholic University of America Press, 2011.
Marion, Jean-Luc. D’ailleurs, la révélation. Grasset, 2020.
Miner, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions: A Study of Summa theologiae. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Owen, Huw P. “The Evidence for Christian Theism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 (1963): 123-138.
Pearson, Giles. Aristotle on Desire. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Pinsent, Andrew. The Second-Person Perspective in Aquinas’s Ethics: Virtues and Gifts. Routledge, 2011.
Plato and Aristotle. Plato Gorgias and Aristotle Rhetoric. Translated by Joe Sachs. Focus Publishing, 2009.
Stump, Eleonore. “Aquinas’s Ethics: The Infused Virtues and the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 95, no. 2 (2019): 269-281.
Stump, Eleonore. “Aquinas’s Virtue Ethics and Its Metaphysical Foundation.” In Was ist das für den Menschen Gute? / What is Good for a Human Being, edited by Jan Szaif and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, 209-228. Walter de Gruyter, 2004.
Stump, Eleonore. “The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics: Aquinas on the Passions.” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 28 (2011): 29-43.
Suárez, Francisco. Opera omnia. Edited by Charles Berton. Apud Ludovicum Vivès, 1856-1878.
Wolff, Christian. Philosophia prima, sive ontologia. Rengeriana, 1730.