Al-Ghazali on Taqlid, Ijtihad, and Forming Beliefs

PDF
Published: Dec 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.36321
Keywords:
Al-Ghazali taqlid ijtihad belief justification
Mesfer Alhayyani
Kuwait University, Kuwait
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6588-5630
Abstract

Medieval philosophy has often been stereotypically characterized as rigidly reliant on authority and lacking originality. However, the present research challenges this perception by unveiling the lively debates among medieval philosophers in the Islamic World regarding the autonomy of thought for both esteemed scholars and everyday individuals. Rather than passively accepting authoritative doctrines, these philosophers contemplated the extent to which independent reflection should play a role. Surprisingly, their reflections resonate in the contemporary world as we grapple with parallel questions about the balance between authority and individual inquiry in our society. The first part of the paper introduces a timeless challenge faced by medieval Islamic philosophers: the formation of beliefs. This predicament persists today – how much should we rely on authority without critical examination, and when should we subject our beliefs to scrutiny? The paper introduces an Islamic classical tradition followed by Muslim jurists, theologians, and philosophers: the nuanced distinction between Taqlid (following authority) and Ijtihad (independent reasoning) to address this. The perspective of Al-Ghazali, a prominent representative of this tradition, is thoroughly examined, highlighting its contributions and challenges. In its methodological approach, this paper rigorously analyzes primary and secondary sources relevant to Al-Ghazali’s views in Arabic and English. This comprehensive analysis aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between authority and independent reasoning in the context of medieval Islamic philosophy.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adamson, Peter. Philosophy in the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Al-Ghazali, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad. Al-Munqid Mina-ḍ-ḍalāl. Bairūt: al-Maktaba al-ʻAṣriyyah, 2019.
Alhayyani, Mesfer. “Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Ibn Yaqzan: The Natural Progression of the Mind and Intellectual Elitism.” Pharos Journal of Theology 103, no. 4 (2023): 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.104.421.
Alston, William P. “Concepts of Epistemic Justification.” Monist 68, no. 1 (1985): 57-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198568116.
Averroes. Decisive Treatise. Edited by Massimo Campanini. New Jersey: Gorgias Press, 2017.
Burge, Tyler. “Content Preservation.” The Philosophical Review 102, no. 4 (1993): 457-488. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2185680.
Comesaña, Juan, and Peter Klein. “Skepticism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/skepticism/.
Conee, Earl, and Richard Feldman. Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Durand, Marion, Simon Shogry, and Dirk Baltzly. “Stoicism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/stoicism/.
Dutton, Blake D. “Al-Ghazālī on Possibility and the Critique of Causality.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10, no. 1 (2001): 23-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1057060801101027.
Gannagé, Emma. “The Rise of Falsafa: Al-Kindī (d. 873), On First Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, edited by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke, 30-62. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Goldman, Alvin I. “What Is Justified Belief?” In Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, edited by George Sotiros Pappas, 1-23. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9493-5_1.
Griffel, Frank. “Al-Gazālī’s Concept of Prophecy: The Introduction of Avicennan Psychology into Aš‘arite Theology.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14, no. 1 (2004): 101-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0957423904000025.
Griffel, Frank. “Al‐Ghazālī’s Use of ‘Original Human Disposition’ (Fiṭra) and Its Background in the Teachings of Al‐Fārābī and Avicenna.” The Muslim World 102, no. 1 (2011): 1-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2011.01376.x.
Griffel, Frank. “Taqlīd of the Philosophers: Al-Ghazālī’s Initial Accusation in his Tahāfut.” In Ideas, Images, and Methods of Portrayal: Insights into Classical Arabic Literature and Islam, edited by Sebastian Günther, 273-296. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047407263_016.
Griffel, Frank. “The Project of Enlightenment in Islamic-Arabic Culture.” In The Cultures of Maimonideanism: New Approaches to the History of Jewish Thought, edited by James T. Robinson, 1-20. Leiden: Brill, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004174504.i-440.5.
Guida, Michelangelo. “Al-Afghānī and Namık Kemal’s Replies to Ernest Renan: Two Anti-Westernist Works in the Formative Stage of Islamist Thought.” Turkish Journal of Politics 2, no. 2 (2011): 57-70.
Kukkonen, Taneli. “Al-Ghazālī on Error.” In Islam and Rationality, edited by Frank Griffel, 3-31. Leiden: Brill, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004307490_002.
Malmgren, Anna-Sara. “Is There A Priori Knowledge by Testimony?” The Philosophical Review 115, no. 2 (2006): 199-241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2005-015.
Pritchard, Duncan. “Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Luck.” Metaphilosophy 34, nos. 1/2 (2003): 106-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00263.
Sherman, Nancy. “Stoic Consolations.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023): 565-587. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35405.
Vahid, Hamid. “Knowledge and Varieties of Epistemic Luck.” Dialectica 55, no. 4 (2001): 351-362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2001.tb00224.x.
Williams, Bernard. Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.