Liberalism and Aristotelianism: Reflecting on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue


Published: Jun 30, 2025
Keywords:
virtue liberalism Aristotelian federalism human good
Tatia Basilaia
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0702-3183
Abstract

Alasdair MacIntyre marks liberalism as a key opponent standing in opposition to an Aristotelian virtue ethics framework, and of the ability of communities to base a way of life around virtues centered upon man’s telos and what makes a good human life. This paper will argue that this does not need to be the case by citing how classical liberal political aims of decentralization of power and federalism can promote the efforts of communities attempting to build a culture with a focus on inculcating virtue through the lens of an Aristotelian sense of telos. MacIntyre himself acknowledges the vast differences in definitions of the virtues across cultures throughout history, and how there is unlikely to be any moral consensus. This paper will look at examples from the United States of America’s early history, as well as the modern example of the European Union, to illustrate samples of societies inculcating and guarding a traditional worldview within a decentralized political environment. The liberal political aim of decentralization of power provides more autonomy to local communities, including allowing those communities to build their own culture with a focus on forming a society interested in answering the question of what a good human life consists of. This paper will argue that it is precisely the liberal individualism that MacIntyre decries as a foe to Aristotelian teleology that provides an avenue for those interested in restoring Aristotelian virtue ethics to thrive.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Anti-Federalists, The Federalist Papers, and the Big Argument for Union.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 16, no. 1 (1993): 111-118. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/233/Anti_Federalists__The_Federalist_Papers__and_the_Big_Argument_for_Union.pdf.
Aristotle. Politics. Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Hackett Publishing Company, 1998.
Bagby, John R. “Aristotle and Aristoxenus on Effort.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 6, no. 2 (2021): 51-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.25682.
Burke, Edmund. Burke’s Speech on Conciliation with the Colonies. Originally delivered March 22, 1775. Leach, Shewell, and Sanborn, 1895. https://archive.org/details/burkespeechon00burkrich/page/42/mode/2up?view=theater&q=right.
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the French Revolution & Other Essays. J. M. Dent & Sons, 1951. https://archive.org/details/reflectionsonthe005907mbp/page/n5/mode/2up.
Donev, Dejan, and Denko Skalovski. “Responsibility in the Time of Crisis.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 1 (2023): 87-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.33353.
Fischer, David Hackett. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. Oxford University Press, 1989.
Jefferson, Thomas. “From Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Adams.” Founders Online, National Archives, September 11, 1804. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-44-02-0341.
Kant, Immanuel. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd edition. University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Madison, James. The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter. Penguin Classics, 2003.
Orbán, Viktor. “Speech by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán at the Századvég Sovereignty Conference.” Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister, November 13, 2023. https://miniszterelnok.hu/en/speech-by-prime-minister-viktor-orban-at-the-szazadveg-sovereignty-conference/.
Zeleny, Jeff. “Prominent Pastor Calls Romney’s Church a Cult.” The New York Times, October 8, 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/08/us/politics/prominent-pastor-calls-romneys-church-a-cult.html.