An Aporetic Reading of the Apology
Published:
Dec 31, 2025
Keywords:
Plato Apology aporia dialogue monologue
Abstract
The thesis of this paper is that Plato’s Apology has an internally structured dialogue which may be read aporetically and may be used to read its monologic external structure as a dialogue proper. The aporia of the Apology has to do with the notion of ‘justice’ (dikē). Drawing from Hesiod’s observations as to the ambiguity of the term ‘justice,’ I argue that the same type of ambiguity is implicitly exploited by Socrates in the Apology. It is traditionally the case in Plato’s aporetic dialogues that Socrates’ interlocutor(s) are the ones reduced to a state of aporia. I argue that under this reading, the jury plays a dual function, acting both as Socrates’ audience and interlocutor, and that they find themselves at an impasse (aporia) as to what justice is and whether they have acted justly.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Filliou Vasilescu, M. (2025). An Aporetic Reading of the Apology. Conatus - Journal of Philosophy, 10(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.39780
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Allen, R. E. Socrates and Legal Obligation. University of Minnesota Press, 1980. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/292483.
Aristotle. Poetics. Penguin Classics, 1996.
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, edited by Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press, 1982.
Bakhurst, David. “Truth, Philosophy, and Legal Discourse.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 47, no. 3 (1997): 395-401. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/825975.
Ballard, Edward G. Socratic Ignorance: An Essay on Platonic Self-Knowledge. Martinus Nijhoff, 1965.
Bloom, Allan. “Allan Bloom’s Lectures on Socrates (Boston College, 1983).” Open Culture. https://www.openculture.com/allan-blooms-lectures-on-socrates-boston-college-1983.
Boys-Stones, G. R., and J. H. Haubold, eds. Plato and Hesiod. Oxford University Press, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199236343.001.0001.
Burnyeat, M. F. “The Impiety of Socrates.” Ancient Philosophy 17, no. 1 (1997): 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19971714.
Charalabopoulos, Nikos G. Platonic Drama and its Ancient Reception. Cambridge University Press, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978081.
Conte, Gian Biagio. The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius’s Satyricon. University of California Press, 1996. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520918504 .
Cooper, J. M., and D. S. Hutchinson, eds. Plato: Complete Works. Hackett, 1997.
Cotton, A. K. Platonic Dialogue and Education of the Reader. Oxford University Press, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684052.001.0001.
Darkow, Angela. The Spurious Speeches of the Lysianic Corpus. Kessinger Publishing, 2010.
De Strycker, E. Plato’s Apology of Socrates. A Literary and Philosophical Study with a Running Commentary. Edited and Completed from the Papers of the Late E. de Strycker S.J., edited by S. R. Slings. Brill, 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004329423.
Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Ficino Marsilio. The Letters of Marsilio Ficino Volume 2 (Book III). Shepheard-Walwyn Publishers, 1978.
Fowler, Robert, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge University Press, 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521813026.
Gagarin, Michael, ed. Antiphon: The Speeches. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Graziosi, Barbara. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Halperin, David. “Plato and the Erotics of Narrativity.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Julia Annas, James C. Klagge, and Nicholas D. Smith, 93-129. Oxford Academic, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198239512.003.0005.
Hesiod. Theogony. Works and Days. Testimonia. Edited by Glenn W. Most. Harvard University Press, 2007.
Hirzel, Rudolf. Der Dialog Vol. II. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1895.
Hunter, Richard. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge University Press, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003377.
Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585579.
Karamanolis, George, and Vasilis Politis, eds. The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274293.
King James. Daemonologie: A Critical Edition, Modern English, edited by Bryan Warren. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016.
Leibowitz, David M. The Ironic Defense of Socrates. Cambridge University Press, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761829.
McCabe, Mary Margaret. Platonic Conversations. Oxford University Press, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732884.001.0001.
Mecke, Jochen. “Dialogue in Narration (the Narrative Principle).” In The Interpretation of Dialogue, edited by Tulio Maranhao, 195-218. Chicago University Press, 1990.
Mittelstrass, Jürgen. “On Socratic Dialogue.” In Platonic Writings/Platonic Readings, edited by Charles L. Griswold Jr., 126-142. Routledge, 1988.
Morgan, Kathryn. “Plato.” In Speech in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5, edited by Mathieu de Bakker and Irene J. F. de Jong, 539-564. Brill, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498815_025.
Morrison, Donald. “On the Alleged Historical Reliability of Plato’s Apology.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82, no. 3 (2000): 235-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2000.82.3.235.
Morson, Gary Saul, and Caryl Emerson. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford University Press, 1990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804765961.
Nightingale, Andrea Wilson. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582677.
Nüsser, Olaf. Albins Prolog und die Dialogtheorie des Platonismus. De Gruyter, 1991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110938203.
Plato. Apology. Perseus Digital Library.
Plato. The Republic. Penguin Books, 2003.
Porter, John R. “Adultery by the Book: Lysias 1 (On the Murder of Eratosthenes) and Comic Diegesis.” In The Attic Orators, edited by Edwin Carawan, 60-88. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Schirren, Thomas. Philosophos Bios: Die Antike Philosophenbiographie als Symbolische Form. Universitatsverlag Winter, 2005.
Scruton, Roger. Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey. Penguin Books, 1996.
Seeskin, Kenneth. “Is the Apology of Socrates a Parody?” Philosophy and Literature 6, no. 1-2 (1982): 94-105. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/phl.1982.0016.
Stokes, Michael C. Plato: Apology of Socrates. Liverpool University Press, 1997.
Strauss, Leo. Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Szaif, Jan. “Socrates and the Benefits of Puzzlement.” In The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, edited by George Karamanolis and Vasilis Politis, 29-47. Cambridge University Press, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274293.003.
Tennant, John Roger. “Plato’s Apology as Forensic Oratory.” Revista Archai 14, no. 14 (2015): 39-50.
Thesleff, Holger. Platonic Patterns. A Collection of Studies. Parmenides Publishing, 2009.
Verano, Rodrigo. “The Truth Alone Will Suffice: Traces of Spoken Language in Plato’s Apology of Socrates.” Scripta Classica Israelica 37 (2018): 25-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.71043/sci.v37i.2085.
Vergados, Athanassios. Hesiod’s Verbal Craft: Studies in Hesiod’s Conception of Language and Its Ancient Reception. Oxford University Press, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807711.001.0001.
West, Thomas. Plato’s Apology of Socrates: An Interpretation, with a New Translation. Cornell University Press, 1979.
Xenophon. Hiero. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.
Yamagata, Naoko. “Hesiod in Plato: Second Fiddler to Homer?” In Plato and Hesiod, edited by G. R. Boys-Stones and J. Haubold, 68-88. Oxford University Press, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199236343.003.0005.
Zuckert, Catherine H. Plato’s Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. Chicago University Press, 2012.
