Virtue in the Machine: Beyond a One-size-fits-all Approach and Aristotelian Ethics for Artificial Intelligence

PDF
Published: Jun 30, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.40628
Keywords:
AI ethics AI virtues virtuous agents EU AI Act arête Aristotelian ethics for AI seal of excellence for AI virtuous use of AI liberalism borders and AI
Alkis Gounaris
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-6413
George Kosteletos
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-8415
Maria-Artemis Kolliniati
ProCredit Academy, Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1553-7014
Abstract

This paper explores the application of Aristotelian virtue (arête), as quality of excellence and as a key notion of ethics, to AI systems as classified in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. It argues that while the Act’s approach based on ‘ethical data’ and ‘prima facie values’ aligns with the Rossian paradigm, such principles may not be suitable for all AI systems, particularly those in ‘limited’ or ‘minimal risk’ zones. The paper suggests that the Aristotelian concept of virtue can be effectively applied to designing, training, operating and using no-risk or low-risk AI systems. However, its application to the design and training of high-risk areas such as migration, asylum, border control, and justice, where clearly defined objectives are essential, requires ongoing consideration. The paper concludes that by distinguishing between (a) design, development, training, deployment, operation and use, (b) by stage evaluation of systems, and c) virtuous use of the systems, Aristotelian ethics can serve as a post ex evaluating method for all-risk AI systems, while further research and the potential use of regulatory sandboxes are needed to explore the integration of Aristotelian virtues into the design, development and training of such applications. Finally, we propose a virtuous-based ‘AI Seal of Excellence’ certification process, which empowers the virtuous use of AI systems.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anderson, Michael, and Susan Leigh Anderson. “Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent.” AI Magazine 28, no. 4 (2007): 15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v28i4.2065.
Anderson, Michael, Susan Leigh Anderson, Alkis Gounaris, and George Kosteletos. “Towards Moral Machines: A Discussion with Michael Anderson and Susan Leigh Anderson.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 6, no. 1 (2021): 177-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.26832.
Aristotle. On the Soul. Translated by J. A. K. Thomson. Harvard University Press, 1959.
Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by L. Brown. Translated by D. Ross. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Avramides, Anita. “Other Minds.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/other-minds/.
Biggar, Nigel. “An Ethic of Military Uses of Artificial Intelligence: Sustaining Virtue, Granting Autonomy, and Calibrating Risk.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023): 67-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.34666.
Cappuccio, Massimiliano, Eduardo Sandoval, Omar Mubin, Mohammad Obaid, and Mari Velonaki. “Can Robots Make Us Better Humans? Virtuous Robotics and the Good Life with Artificial Agents.” International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (2021): 7-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00700-6.
Carens, Joseph. “Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective.” In Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money, edited by B. Barry and R. Goodin, 25-47. Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.
Carens, Joseph. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press, 1978.
Eisikovits, Nir, and Dan Feldman. “AI and Phronesis.” Moral Philosophy and Politics 9, no. 2 (2022): 181-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2021-0026.
European Commission. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2019.
European Commission. How Can Seal Holders Use the Seal of Excellence? European Commission, 2021. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/seal-excellence/how-can-seal-holders-use-seal-excellence_en.
Gibert, Martin. “The Case for Virtuous Robots.” AI and Ethics 3 (2022): 135-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00185-1.
Gounaris, Alkis, and George Kosteletos. “Writing the Algorithm of Good: Artificial Intelligence as a Machine of Justice.” Ithiki 19 (2024): 6-27 [in Greek]. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.39654.
Gounaris, Alkis. “Can We Literally Talk About Artificial Moral Agents?” 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13671.47520.
Gounaris, Αlkis, and George Kosteletos. “Licensed to Kill: Autonomous Weapons as Persons and Moral Agents.” In Personhood, edited by Dragan Prole and Goran Rujević, 137-189. The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Lab Press, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/aprlp.49.
Henry, Nathan I. N., Mangor Pedersen, Matt Williams, Jamin L. B. Martin, and Liesje Donkin. “A Hormetic Approach to the Value-Loading Problem: Preventing the Paperclip Apocalypse.” arXivLabs (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07462.
Hall, Joshua M. “Just War contra Drone Warfare.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023): 217-239. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.34306.
Hursthouse, Rosalind, and Glen Pettigrove. “Virtue Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue/.
Kolliniati, Maria-Artemis. Interpreting Human Rights: Narratives from Asylum Centers in Greece and Philosophical Values. Routledge, 2024.
Kraut, Richard. “Aristotle’s Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/aristotle-ethics/.
Lekea, Ioanna, George Lekeas, and Pavlos Topalnakos. “Exploring Enhanced Military Ethics and Legal Compliance through Automated Insights: An Experiment on Military Decision-making in Extremis.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023), 345–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35213.
Licklider, Joseph C. R. “Man-Computer Symbiosis.” IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-1, no. 1 (1960): 4-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259.
Livieri, Georgia, Eleni Mangina, Evangelos D. Protopapadakis, and Andrie G. Panayiotou. “The Gaps and Challenges in Digital Health Technology Use as Perceived by Patients: A Scoping Review and Narrative Meta-synthesis.” Frontiers in Digital Health 7 (2025): 1474956. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956.
Long, David. The Animals’ VC: For Gallantry and Devotion: The PDSA Dickin Medal-inspiring Stories of Bravery and Courage. Random House, 2012.
Mullins, Andrew P. J. “What Does Self-control Look Like? Considerations About the Neurobiology of Temperance and Fortitude.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 10, no. 1 (2025): forthcoming. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.36665.
PDSA. PDSA Dickin Medal. https://www.pdsa.org.uk/what-we-do/animal-awards-programme/pdsa-dickin-medal.
Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill, 2015.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1999.
Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press, 2002.
Roden-Bow, Ashley. “Killer Robots and Inauthenticity: A Heideggerian Response to the Ethical Challenge Posed by Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023): 477-486. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.34864.
Ross, William David. The Right and the Good. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2002.
Sandel, Michael. Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.
Serafimova, Silviya. “Whose Morality? Which Rationality? Challenging Artificial Intelligence as a Remedy for the Lack of Moral Enhancement.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7, no. 119 (2020): 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00614-8.
Sullins, John P. “Automated Ethical Practical Reasoning: The Problem of Artificial Phronesis.” In Robophilosophy: Philosophy of, for, and by Social Robotics, edited by J. Seibt, R. Hakli, and M. Nørskov. MIT Press, 2025, forthcoming.
Sutton, Richard S., and Andrew G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. The MIT Press, 2018.
Syse, Henrik, and Martin Cook. “Robotic Virtue, Military Ethics Education, and the Need for Proper Storytellers.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2023): 667-680. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.35684.
Tasioulas, John. “First Steps Towards an Ethics of Robots and Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Practical Ethics 7, no. 1 (2019): 61-95.
Tasioulas, John. “The Rule of Algorithm and the Rule of Law.” Lecture at the University of Vienna, October 15, 2021.
Valenzuela, Pia. “Fredrickson on Flourishing through Positive Emotions and Aristotle’s Eudaimonia.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy 7, no. 2 (2022): 37-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.25202.
Yudkowsky, Eliezer. “Complex Value Systems in Friendly AI.” In Artificial General Intelligence, edited by J. Schmidhuber, K. Thórisson, and M. Looks, 388-393. Springer, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_48.
Yudkowsky, Eliezer. “The Value Loading Problem.” EDGE, July 12, 2021. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26198
Zetzsche, Dirk A., Ross P. Buckley, Janos N. Barberis, and Douglas W. Arner. “Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation.” Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 23, no. 1 (2017): 31-103.
Most read articles by the same author(s)