THE SIGNIFIER AS RUINS

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/dac.25907
Keywords:
“thing” (Das Ding) void “nothing” signifier meaning lacanian “real” (réel) regression something
Fotis Kangelaris
Abstract
Even though the seduction of ruins seems to be coming from a nostalgia for the past which, possibly, refers to the lived experience (Dasein) of youth, of glory and as a result to the vanity of the human creation, to the vanity of life itself, even if we consider ruins as a resistance and victory against time and of this against this very vanity, however, this perception for ruins is nothing but a concealment from the glance of the relation “thing”-signifier and of the way that the “thing” dictates the signifier. Ruins as a regression of the existence towards non-existence, of creativity towards fall, demonstrate the signifier as flowing from the “thing”, the Logos from ineffable, the image from unimagined, of “something” from “nothing”, art itself as a reaction of avoidance of chaos. Essentially, ruins demonstrate meaning as a reaction to “nothing”, for which “nothing” the meaning as ruins regresses when the reason of resistance disappears. Ruins on the way to “nothing”, a step before their absolute disappearance and their return to the protogenic materials of nature from which, besides, they come, that is the fall and crash of the meaning, allow a quick look over the origin of the meaning without the glance being in danger from the emergence of the absolute “nothing” as an origin of the meaning. Ruins attract us because they disclose while at the same time appeal to us because they conceal the void of the “thing” as a descent of the rational world.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles

The copyright for articles in this journal is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use (with the exception of the non-granted right to make derivative works) with proper attribution for non-commercial uses (licence Creative Commons 4.0). EKT/NHRF retains the worldwide right to reproduce, display, distribute, and use articles published in DAC in all formats and media, either separately or as part of collective works for the full term of copyright. This includes but is not limited to the right to publish articles in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the articles, authorize reproduction of articles in their entirety in another EKT/NHRF publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of articles or abstracts thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems.

DAC journal considers all submitted artwork on the condition author(s) confirm that third-party intellectual property rights are not violated in any way.

Author(s) are responsible for securing permissions to publish copyrighted material, such as photographs and other artwork and for paying any fees involved. Production of an article will not begin until the editor has received all relevant permissions.
The copyright for published articles in Design | Arts | Culture is retained by the author(s). By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles can be used freely, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Arnheim, R., (2003). I dynamiki tis arxitektonikis morfis, [The dynamics of architectural form]. Potamianos, I., (trans.). Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
Bachelard, G., (2014). I poiitiki tou horou, [La poetique de l’ espace]. Veltsou, E., (trans.). Athina: Hatzinikoli.
Bakhtin, M., (2017). O Rabelais kai o kosmos tou, [Rabelais and his world]. Pinakoulas, G., (trans.), Ksifara, F., (edit.). Kriti: Panepistimiakes Ekdoseis Kritis.
Barthes, R., (2008). O foteinos thalamus, [La chambre Claire]. Kritikos, G., (trans.). Athina: Kedros.
Benjamin, W., (2009). The origin of German Tragic Drama. Osborne, J., (trans.). New York: Verso Books.
Derrida, J., (1990). Platonos Farmakeia, [La pharmacie de Platon]. Lazos, C., D., (trans.). Athina: Agra.
Hegel, G., W., F., (1993). Fainomenologia tou pneymatos, [Phanomenologie des geistes]. Tzortzopoulos, D., (trans.). Athina: Dodoni.
Hegel, G., W., F., (2013). I epistimi tis logikis, [Wissenschaft der logic]. Tzavaras, G., (trans.). Athina: Dodoni.
Heidegger, M., (2009). Ktizein, katoikein, skeptesthai, [Bauen, wohnen, denken]. Ksiropaidis, G., (trans.), Rinopoulos, L., (edit.). Athina: Plethron.
Kangelaris, F., (2015). To vlemma kai to einai stin psyhosi, 4th ekdosi. Athina: Agyra.
Kangelaris, F., (2017). To pragma i leksi kai o kosmos. Athina: Armos.
Kangelaris, F., (2017). Homo Photographicus. 2nd ekdosi, Thessaloniki: Ropi.
Kangelaris, F., (2020). Tropos tou legein, I morfi tvn pragmaton sthn tehni kai ton vio, idiaitera stin arhitektoniki. Athina: Papazissis.
Lacan, J., (2002). R.S.I. Séminaire 1774-1975. Paris: Éditions de l’ Association Freudienne Internationale, Publication hors commerce.
Lacan, J., (2005). Le Séminaire livre XXIII Le sinthome. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Leader, D., (2005). I klopi tis Mona Liza, [Stealing the Mona Lisa]. Spiliopoulou, M., (trans.). Athina: Kedros.
Metaxas, A-D., I., (2005). I ritoriki ton ereipion, [The ruins’ rhetoric]. Athina: Kastaniotis.
Platon, (2006). Faidros. Doikos, P., (trans.). Thessaloniki: Zitros.
Simmel, G., and others, (1965). The Ruin, Essays on Sociology, Philosophy and Aesthetics. ed. Kurt H. Wolff. New York: Harper and Row.
Tadao, A., (Yann Nussaume) (2014). Pensées sur l’ Architecture et le Paysage. Paris: Arlea.
Hatzistergiou, G., (2020). O politismos ton fantasmaton, [Culture and the phandoms]. Athina: Alexandreia
Most read articles by the same author(s)