The impact of digitalization on employmentproductivity and the role of Social Protection: Socio-economic costs andlegal options
Published:
Apr 20, 2024
Updated:
2024-04-20
Versions:
2024-04-20 (2)
Keywords:
Digitalization, employment, productivity, social security, social protection, costs, legal options
Abstract
The paper begins with a description of digitalization
of work. The negative effects are
the first to be examined and subsequently the
positive effects are presented. Five outcomes
with double effects (a negative and a positive
one) arise from the analysis of digitalization
on employment and productivity. Further, the
implications of digital work on social security
are illustrated, as well as the legal lacunae at
a national, European and international level.
Lastly, we conclude to suggestions which
could counterbalance the negative effects and
enhance the positive ones utilizing techniques
from the European legal order.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Tsetoura, A. (2024). The impact of digitalization on employmentproductivity and the role of Social Protection: Socio-economic costs andlegal options. Social Cohesion and Development, 17(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.12681/scad.32233 (Original work published March 1, 2022)
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anxo D., Mencarini L., Pailhé A., Solaz A., Tanturri M.L. and Flood L. (2011), Gender Differences in Time Use over the Life Course in France, Italy, Sweden, and the US, Feminist Economics. 17:3, 2: 159-195. Epub ahead of print12 July 2011. p//dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.582822.
Bachmann C.J., Beecham J., O’Connor T.G., Scott A., Briskman J. and Scott S. (2019), The cost of love: financial consequences of insecure attachment in antisocial youth, The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 60:12:1343-1350, DOI:10.1111/jcpp.13103.
Behrendt C. and Anh Nguyen Q. (2018a), Innovative approaches for ensuring universal social protection for the future of work, paper has been developed as a background paper to an issue brief for the Global Commission on the Future of Work, ILO. Available at https://
www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/--- dgreports/-- cabinet/documents/publication/ wcms_629864.pdf.
Behrendt C, Anh Nguyen Q and Rani U (2019) Social protection systems and the future of
work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers, ISSA Review, First published:10
September 2019. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12212.
Benedetto S., Drai-Zerbib V., Pedrotti M., Tissier G. and Baccino T., Paterson K. (eds), E-Readers
and Visual Fatigue, PLoS One. 8(12), e83676, published online 2013 Dec 27. Available at
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259567741_E Readers_and_Visual_Fatigue.
Berg J., Furrer M., Harmon E., Rani U., Silberman M.S. (2018), Digital labour platforms and
the future of work – Towards decent work for all, ILO Geneva. Available at https://www.
ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/
wcms_645337.pdf.
Cherry M. and Aloisi A. (2017), ‘Dependent Contractors’ in the Gig Economy: A Comparative
Approach, American University Law Review. 66(3): 635-689 http://digital-commons.wcl.
american.edu/aulr/vol66/iss3/1.
Chesalina O. (2018), Access to social security for digital platform workers in Germany and
in Russia: a comparative study, Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal.
-2(7), noviembre: 7-28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/sllerj.2018.4433.
Craig J.P., Nichols K.K., Akpek E.K., Caffery B., Dua H.S., Joo C.-K. , Liu Z., Nelson J.D., Jason
J. Nichols, Tsubota K., Stapleton F. (2017), TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification
Report. The Ocular Surface. 15(3): 276-283. Epub 2017 July 20. doi: 10.1016/j.
jtos.2017.05.008.
Davidov G. (2017), The status of Uber Drivers. A Purposive Approach, Spanish Labour and
Employment Relations Journal. 6(1-2), noviembre: 6-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/
sllerj.2017.3921.
Degryse C. (2016), Digitalisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets, Brussels,
European Trade Union Institute. Available at https://www.etui.org/Publications2/Working-
Papers/Digitalisation-of-the-economy-and-its-impact-on-labour-markets.
De Stefano V. (2016), The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork
and labour protection in the “gig-economy”, Conditions of Work and Employment Series
No.71, Geneva, ILO. Available at https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/-
--protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_443267.pdf.
Eichhorst W. and Rinne U. (2017), Digital Challenges for the Welfare State IZA Institut of Labor
Economics. Policy Paper No. 134, November. Available at www.iza.org.
Eichhorst W., Hinte H., Rinne U. and Tobsch V. (2016), How Big is the Gig? Assessing the
Preliminary Evidence on the Effects of Digitalization on the Labor Market, IZA Policy paper
No. 117, October. Available at http://ftp.iza.org/pp117.pdf.
Enzo W. (2018), Setting out for social security, Research Department Working Paper No. 34,
September ILO. Available at https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---
inst/documents/publication/wcms_645871.pdf.
Eurofound (2017), Non-standard forms of employment: Recent trends and future prospects
Dublin. Available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/customisedreport/
/non-standard-forms-of-employment-recent-trends-and-future-prospects.
Fouarge D. (2003), Costs of Non-Social Policy: Towards an economic framework of quality social
policies - And the costs of not having them, Report for the Employment and Social Affairs
DG, European Commission. Available at http://www.temaasyl.se/Documents/EU-dokument/
Kommisionsdokument/Cost%20Of%20Non%20Social%20Policy.pdf.
Frey C.B. and Osborne M.A. (2013), The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to
Computerisation?, University of Oxford. Available at http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/
downloads/ academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf.
Guo O.D. L.W. and Akpek E. (2020), The negative effects of dry eye disease on quality of life
and visual function, Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. Nov 3;50(SI-2):1611- 1615. doi:
3906/sag-2002-143.
ILO (2017) and Gallup: Towards a better future for women and work: Voices of women and
men. Available at http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/
documents/publica tion/wcms_546256.pdf.
International Social Security Association (ISSA) (2016) Ten global challenges for social Security.
Available at www.issa.int/10.
ILO (2017b) Synthesis Report of the National Dialogues on the Future of Work, Geneva.
publication/wcms_591505.pdf.
ILO (2017c), Inception Report for the Global Commission on the Future of Work Geneva.
Available at ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/publication/
wcms_591502.pdf.
Nichols K.K., Bacharach J., Holland E., Kislan T., Shettle L., Lunacsek O., Lennert B., Burk C. and
Patel V. (2017), Impact of dry eye disease on work productivity, and patients’ satisfaction
with oOver-the-counter dry eye treatments. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
(7): 2975-2982. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19419.
OECD (2018), The future of social protection: What works for non-standard workers, OECD
Publishing, Paris. Available at https://www.oecd.org/els/the-future-of-social-protection-
-en.htm.
OECD (2019) Employment Outlook, The future of work, Highlights. Available at oecd.org/
employment/Employment-Outlook-2019-Highlight-EN.pdf.
Rani U. and Furrer M. (2019), “On-demand digital economy: Can experience ensure work and
income security for microtask workers?”, Journal of Economics and Statistics. De Gruyter
(3): 565-597 DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2018-0019.
Reynolds BW/flexjobs (2017), Annual Survey Finds Workers Are More Productive at Home, And
More. Available at https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/productive-working-remotely-topcompanies-
hiring/.
Rosenfield M. (2016), Computer vision syndrome (a.k.a. digital eye strain), The College of
Optometrists January. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295902618_
Computer_vision_syndrome_aka_digital_eye_strain.
Stergiou A. (2014), Social security law, Sakkoulas publications, 2nd edition, Athens-Thessaloniki.
Tsetoura A. (2014), The new provisions of Regulation 883/2004, (Greek) Social Security Review:
-127.
Tsetoura A. (2017), The European Pensioner, PhD thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,
Greece.
Tsetoura A. (2015), Social security circumvention as obstacle to social justice: the correlation
with labour status and whistle-blowing. Social Cohesion and Development. 10(1): 29-44
Yamada M., Mizuno Y., Shigeyasu C. (2012), Impact of dry eye on work productivity,
Clinicoeconomics Outcomes Research. 4: 307-312. Epub 2012 Oct 10. DOI:10.2147/CEOR.
S36352.
