Ethics on Animal Use in Biomedical Research

Published: Feb 22, 2016
bioethics ethics animal research 3Rs
Νικόλαος Κωστομητσόπουλος (Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos)

Despite all the benefits, the use of animals in biomedical research was, and still is, a subject of debate with respect to its true usefulness. The sensitivity of the community and the interest of scientists working in the field of Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare have clearly demonstrated that the use of animals in biomedical research must be conducted under specific scientific, legal and ethical rules.

The ethical justification of a research project starts from the initial designing phase of the project until the completion of the study and the review of the obtained results. Main considerations of an ethical documentation are: the precise definition of the goals of the project and the existing probabilities for its success; the selection of the appropriate animal model, the implementation of the 3Rs’ concept for replacement, reduction and refinement; a pilot study and a systematic review of previously published animal research on the topic; the availability of the appropriate facilities, equipment and expertise to guarantee high standards of animal accommodation, husbandry, care and use. The ethical documentation of a project by scientists themselves involves teamwork and a sustainable rather than a one-off procedure.

The ethical justification of the laboratory animal research protocols reflects the interest and the responsibility of scientists for reduction and refinement of animal experimentation. This process built a trust relationship between scientists and the society.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Original Articles
Download data is not yet available.
Baker D, Lidster K, Sottomayor A, Amor S. Two years later: Journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies. PLOS Biology 2014, 12(1): e1001756.
Bateson P. Assessment of pain in animals. Animal Behaviour 1991, 42: 827-839.
Baumans V, Clausing P, Hubrecht R, Reber A, Vitale A, Wyffels E, Gyger M (2006). Report of the FELASA’s working group on standardization of enrichment. In Web guides (
Chiarotti F and Puopolo M. Refinement in behav-ioural research: a statistical approach. In: Progress in Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation. Eds. M. Balls, A.-M. van Zeller, and M. Halder. Elsevier, The Nether-lands, 2000: 1222-1238.
Council of Europe. European Convention ETS 123 on the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Strasbourg, 1986.
Οδηγία 2010/63 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου περί προστασίας των ζώων που χρησιμοποιούνται για επιστημονικούς σκο-πούς. OJ 2010, L276: 33-79.
Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Systemic Reviews in Health care (Eds: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG). 2nd edition BMJ Books, London, UK, 2001.
de Vries RBM, Wever KE, Avey MT, Stephens ML, Sena ES, Leenaars M. The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies. ILAR Journal 2014, 55(3): 427-437.
European Union. Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. OJ 1986, L358: 1-28.
FELASA Recommendations for the Accreditation of Education and Training Courses in Laboratory Animal Science. 2015
Ferdowsian HR, Beck N. Ethical and scientific considerations regarding animal testing and re-search. PLoS One 2011, 6(9): e24059.
Festing M, Altman D. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR Journal 2002, 43(4): 244-258.
Festing M. Design and Statistical methods in stud-ies using animal models of development. ILAR Journal 2006, 47(1): 5-14.
Festing S, Wilkinson R. The ethics of animal research. EMBO Reports 2007, 8 (6): 526-530.
Greek JS, Greek CR. What will we do if we don’t experiment on animals? Medical Research for the twenty first century. Trafford, Victoria BC, Canada, 2004.
Guhad F. Introduction to the 3Rs (Refinement, Reduction, Replacement). Cont Topics 2005, 44 (2): 58-59.
Huque MF. Experiences with meta-analysis in NDA submissions. Proc Biopharmac Sec Am Stat Assoc 1988,2: 28-33.
Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MFW, Cuthill IC, Fry D, Hutton J, Altman DG. Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals. PLoS One 2009, 4(11): e7824.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research re-porting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting an-imal research. PLOS Biology 2010, 8(6): e1000412.
Κωστομητσόπουλος ΝΓ, Καραγιαννάκος ΠΕ (1999). Εναλλακτικές μέθοδοι στη χρησιμοποίη-ση ζωϊκών προτύπων στη χειρουργική έρευνα. Στο: Τιμητικός Τόμος Καθηγητού Β.Χ. Γολεμάτη. Εκδ. Ελληνική Εταιρεία Ενδοσκοπικής Χειρουρ-γικής & άλλων Επεμβατικών Μεθόδων. Αθήνα, 1999: 187-193.
Κωστομητσόπουλος Ν, Αρβανίτη Α, Δηλέ Χ, Παπαδόπουλος Η, Παπατσίρος ΒΓ, Κυριάκης ΣΚ. Νομοθεσία για την προστασία, την υγεία και την προστασία των ζώων που χρησιμοποιούνται για πειραματικούς και εκπαιδευτικούς σκοπούς. ΠΕΚΕ 2007, 58(3): 270-274.
Kostomitsopoulos N, van Loo P, Paronis E, Alexakos P, Balafas E, Baumans V. The influence of the location of a nest box in an individual ventilated cage on the preference of mice to use it. JAAWS 2007, 10: 112-121.
Lloyd MH, Foren BW, Wolfensohn. Refinement: promoting the three Rs in practice. Laboratory Animals 2008, 42: 284-293.
Macleod MR, McLean AL, Kyriakopoulou A, Serghiou S, Arno de Wilde A, Sherratt N, Hirst T, Hemblade R, Bahor Z, Nunes-Fonseca C, Potluru A, Thomson A, Baginskitae J, Egan K, Vesterinen H, Currie GL, Churilov L, Howells DW, Sena ES. Risk of bias in reports of in vivo research: a focus for improvement. PLOS Biology 2015, DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273.
McConway K. The number of subjects in animal behaviour experiments: is Still still right? Ethics in Research on Animal Behaviour, (eds M. Stamp Dawkins and L.M. Gosling) Academic Press, London, UK, 1992: 35-38.
Morton D. The importance of non-statistical design in refining animal experiments. REDVET 2008: IX(10B).
Morton DM, Griffiths PHM. Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in ex-perimental animals and an hypothesis for assess-ment. Veterinary Record 1985, 116: 431-436.
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). Why do a pilot study? (
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). Experimental Design Assistant (https//
National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1996.
Nevalainen T. Training for reduction in laboratory animal use. Alter Lab Anim 2004, 32 (suppl2): 65-67.
Olsson IA, Hansen AK, Sandoe P. Ethics and refinement in animal research. Science 2007, 317: 1680.
Προεδρικό Διάταγμα 56. Προσαρμογή της ελληνικής νομοθεσίας στην Οδηγία 2010/63/ΕΕ του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου της 22ας Σεπτεμβρίου 2010 σχετικά με την προστασία των ζώων που χρησιμοποιούνται για επιστημονικούς σκοπούς. ΦΕΚ Α’ 106/2013.
Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E, Wheble P, Briscoe C, Sandercock P, Macleod M, Mignini LE, Jayaram P, Khan KS. Comparison of treatment effects be-tween animal experiments and clinical trials: sys-tematic review. BMJ 2007, 334 (7586): 197
Porter DG. Ethical scores for animal experi-ments. Nature 1992, 356: 101-102.
Reines BP. On the locus of medical discovery. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991,116:183-209.
Rollin BE. Animal research: a moral science. EMBO Reports 2007, 8(6): 521-525.
Russell WMS, Burch RL. The principles of Hu-mane Experimental Technique. London, UK: Methuen, 1959.
van der Meer M, Rolls A, Baumans V, Olivier B, van Zutphen LF. Use of score sheets for welfare assessment of transgenic mice. Laboratory Animals 2001,35(4): 379-389.
Wakefield ID, Polland C, Redfern WS, Hammond TG, Vlentin JP. The application of in vitro meth-ods to safety pharmacology. Fundam Clin Phar-macol 2002,16: 209-218.