This is an outdated version published on 2021-01-27. Read the most recent version.
Social inequalities in the distribution of social capital indicators among internet users and non-users
Published:
Jan 27, 2021
Versions:
2021-01-27 (1)
Keywords:
Social capital social trust social inequalities internet users and non-users
Abstract
In this article we explore two dimensions of social capital, in particular social trust and the informal networks of internet users and non-users. For this purpose, we use empirical data from the 3rd wave of the World Internet Project (WIP) which took place in 2019. Data analysis shows that internet users have greater stock of social capital compared to the non-users, with regards to both dimensions of social capital, i.e. social trust and informal networks. However, data analysis also shows that the use of internet is not directly connected to most indicators of social capital. Instead, the use of internet is connected to users’ socio-economic and demographic characteristics, which eventually differentiate the distribution of social capital.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Linardis, A., & Fragoulis, G. (2021). Social inequalities in the distribution of social capital indicators among internet users and non-users. The Greek Review of Social Research, 156, 175–203. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.25951
- Issue
- 2021: 156
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Μερικές ιδιότητες των πεδίων (μτφ.: Ν. Παναγιωτόπουλος και Π. Γεωργίου). Επιθεώρηση Κοινωνικών Ερευνών, 81, σελ. 3-10 .
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Μικρόκοσμοι. Τρεις μελέτες πεδίου (επιμ.: Ν. Παναγιωτόπουλος). Αθήνα: Δελφίνι.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Κοινωνικός χώρος και γένεση των τάξεων. Στο N. Παναγιωτόπουλος (επιμ.), Pierre Bourdieu Γλώσσα και συμβολική εξουσία. Αθήνα: Καρδαμίτσας.
Δεμερτζής, Ν. και Λιναρδής, Α. (2020). Οι εν Ελλάδι πολλοί μη χρήστες διαδικτύου. https://www.kathimerini.gr/1065842/opinion/epikairothta/politikh/oi-en-elladipolloi-mh-xrhstes-diadiktyoy
Εθνικό Κέντρο Κοινωνικών Ερευνών (2015). Το διαδίκτυο στην Ελλάδα 2015 (Κύριος ερευνητής Ν. Δεμερτζής). https://www.ekke.gr/research/dimosieuseis/to-diadiktio-stin-ellada-2015
Εθνικό Κέντρο Κοινωνικών Ερευνών (2017). Το διαδίκτυο στην Ελλάδα 2016 (Κύριος ερευνητής Ν. Δεμερτζής). https://www.ekke.gr/research/dimosieuseis/to-diadiktio-stin-ellada-2017
Fukuyama, F. (1998). Εμπιστοσύνη. Αθήνα: Νέα Σύνορα.
Giddens A. (2001). Οι συνέπειες της νεωτερικότητας. Αθήνα: Κριτική.
Κονιόρδος, Σ. (2006). Κοινωνικό κεφάλαιο: μεταξύ θεωρητικής σαφήνειας και σύγχυσης. Επιστήμη και Κοινωνία: Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής και Ηθικής Θεωρίας, 16, σελ. 1-38.
Κονιόρδος, Σ. (2010). Κοινωνικό κεφάλαιο και εμπιστοσύνη (και κοινωνία των πολιτών) – Ταύτιση ή απόκλιση;. Στο Σ. Κονιόρδος (επιμ.). Κοινωνικό κεφάλαιο και κοινωνία των πολιτών (σελ. 78-98). Αθήνα: Παπαζήση.
Λιναρδής, Α., Κουσούλη, Μ. και Σταθογιαννάκου, Ζ. (2012). Μια bottom-up διερεύνηση των διαστάσεων του κοινωνικού κεφαλαίου. Κείμενα Εργασίας 2012/25. Αθήνα: Εθνικό Κέντρο Κοινωνικών Ερευνών.
Στυλιανού Σ., Μηλιώνη Δ. (2017). Κοινωνικό κεφάλαιο και διαδίκτυο: Πώς η γενικευμένη εμπιστοσύνη επηρεάζει το δεσμευτικό, γεφυρωτικό και διασυνδετικό διαδικτυακό κοινωνικό κεφάλαιο. Στο N. Δεμερτζής (επιμ.), Κοινωνία της Πληροφορίας. Διακυβέρνηση και Διαδίκτυο (σελ. 91-120). Αθήνα: Εθνικό Κέντρο Κοινωνικών Ερευνών.
Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture. Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. California: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (ed) Handbook of the theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: Polity Press.
Claridge, T. (2018). Functions of social capital. Bonding, bridging, linking. Ανασύρθηκε από: https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends:’’ Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, pp. 1143-1168.
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13 (6), pp. 873-892.
Ervasti H., Kouvo A. and Venetoklis T. (2019). Social and institutional trust in times of Crisis: Greece, 2002–2011, Soc Indic Res, 141, pp. 1207–1231, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1862-y
Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London: Routledge.
Foster, M., Meinhard, A. and Berger, I. (2003). The role of social capital. Bonding, bridging or both? Working Paper Series, Vol. 2003 (1). Centre for Voluntary Sector Studies, Ryerson University.
Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization. UK: Polity Press.
Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a job. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V. N. and Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire. The World Bank.
Keele, L. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (2), pp. 241-254.
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. and Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Communication & Society, 9 (5), pp. 582-611.
Koniordos, S. (2008). Social capital contested. International Review of Sociology 18(2), pp. 317-337.
Lee, P. (2015). Should we adjust for a confounder if empirical and theoretical criteria yield contradictory results? A simulation study. Sci Rep 4, 6085. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06085
Norris, P. and Davis, J. (2007). Continental divide: Social capital in the US and Europe.’. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald and G. Eva (Εds.) Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 239-265). London: Sage.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 24, pp. 1-24.
Putnam, R.D. and Goss, K.A. (2003). Introduction. In R.D. Putnam (Εd.) Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 3-19). Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Society. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy works. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Rothstein, B. and Uslaner, E.M. (2005). Equality, corruption and social trust. World Politics, 58, October, pp. 41-72.
Siisiäinen, M. (2000). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. ISTR Fourth International Conference, July 5-8, Trinity College. Dublin: Ireland.
Szreter, S., and Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, pp. 650-667.
Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: implications for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2), pp. 225-249.
