Spectacularization of political activism: Subject matter and social effect


Published: Jan 29, 2022
Keywords:
political activism actionism political performance political happening political art installation
Nataliia Khoma
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-5741
Vasyl Kozma
Abstract

 

Political actionism can be defined as a type of political participation that manifests through various spectacular forms of sociopolitical activism and has become increasingly prevalent in contemporary politics. This paper aims to show the significance and effectiveness of political actionism as a modern form of political activism. It will be argued that political actionism is capable of reshaping political processes through theatrical representations, specifically the play format, and other forms of entertainment. Furthermore, evidence will be presented of its increasing importance in the information society. The different possible functions and directions of political actionism in postmodern politics will also be outlined and the role of symbolization, visualization, provocation, and carnivalization in political actionism will be elucidated. Departures from the previous system of political activism will be exemplified through a discussion of political performances, happenings, and art installations, three essential forms of political actionism, and emphasis will be laid on the varying role and social significance of political actionism depending on the political regime of a particular state. Finally, a comprehensive typology of actionism will be proposed.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Nataliia Khoma, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine
ScD in Political Science, Professor at the Department of Political Sciences and International Relations, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine
Vasyl Kozma, National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
ScD in Political Science, Associate Professor at the Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
References
Alexander, J. C. (2003). The meaning of social life: A cultural sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, J. C. (2006). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen and J. Mast (Eds.), Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics and ritual (pp. 29-90). London: Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, J. C. (2011). Performance and power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Anderson, P. (2011). Istoki postmoderna [The origins of postmodernity] (A. Appolonov, Trans.). Moscow: Territoriya budushchego. (Original work published 1998).
Andrienko, О. V. (2009). Ihrove nachalo u butti demokratichnoho suspilstva [The game beginning in the being of democratic Society]. Nauka, Religiia, Suspilstvo, 2, pp. 123-127.
Averianova, N. (2016). Konsoliduiucha rol mystetstva v suchasnomu ukrainskomu suspilstvi [Consolidating role of art in the modern Ukrainian society]. Ukrainoznavchyi Almanakh, 19, pp. 48-51.
Baudrillard, J. (2007). In the shadow of the silent majorities (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O. (2007). Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13 (2), pp. 135-151. doi: 10.1080/10286630701342741
Beumers, B., Etkind, A., Gurova, O. and Turoma, S. (Eds.) (2018). Cultural forms of protest in Russia. London: Routledge.
Bishop, C. (2006). Participation. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.
Borreca, A. (1993). Political dramaturgy: A dramaturg’s (re)view. The Drama Review, 37 (2), pp. 56-79. doi: 10.2307/1146249
Chudovska-Kandyba, I. (2009). Performans vizualnykh komunikatyvnykh praktyk u suchasnomu sotsiokulturnomu prostori [Performance of visual communicative practices in the modern sociocultural space]. Metodolohiia, teoriia ta praktyka sotsiolohichnoho analizu suchasnoho suspilstva, 15, pp. 280-282.
Çıdam, Ç., Scheuerman, W. E., Delmas, C., Pineda E. R., Celikates R. and Livingston, A. (2020). Theorizing the politics of protest: Contemporary debates on civil disobedience. Contemporary Political Theory, 19 (3), pp. 513-546. doi: 10.1057/s41296-020-00392-7
Cvejić, B. and Vujanović, A. (Eds.) (2015). Public sphere by performance (2nd ed.). Berlin: B_Books.
Debord, G. (2000). Obshchestvo spektaklya [The society of the spectacle] (S. Ofertas and M. Yakubovich, Trans.). Moscow: Logos. (Original work published 1969).
Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.) Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dewey, J. (1989). Creative democracy: The task before us. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 14, pp. 224-230). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1939).
Downey, A. (2014). Art and politics now. London: Thames and Hudson.
Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Farrelli, M. P. (2001). Collaborative circles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Górska, B. and Koschalka, B. (Eds.) (2011). Pomarańczowa alternatywa: happeningiem w komunizm [Happening against communism by the Orange Alternative]. Kraków: Międzynarodowe Centrum Kultury.
Gruieva, O. V. (2018). Politychnyi aktsionizm: poniattia, formy, dosvid vykorystannia u politychnomu protsesi [Political actionism: notions, forms and manifestation in political processes]. Politychne Zhyttia, 1, pp. 20-25. doi: 10.31558/2519-2949.2018.1
Honcharenko, D. (2013). Performans-art yak yavyshche kultury postmodernizmu [Performance art as a phenomenon of postmodern culture]. Aktualni problemy mystetskoi praktyky i mystetstvoznavchoi nauky, 5, рp. 333-337.
Hruieva, O. (2016). Perfomans: Vykorystannia tvorchoho potentsialu v politytsi [Performance: The use of creative potential in politics]. Derzhava i Pravo, 74, рp. 97-107.
Hruieva, O. (2017). Happening polityczny jako technologia postmodernistycznego działania politycznego: Analiza zagranicznego i krajowego doświadczenia zastosowania [Political happenings as an instrument of postmodern political action: An analysis of foreign and national experience]. Visnyk Prykarpatskoho Universytetu, Politologiia, 11, рp. 30-37.
Inglehart, R. (2018). Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65 (1), pp. 19-51. doi: 10.2307/2657288
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jonson, L. (2015). Art and protest in Putin’s Russia. London: Routledge.
Jonson, L. and Erofeev, A. (Eds.) (2018). Russia – Art resistance and the conservative-authoritarian Zeitgeist. London: Routledge.
Klanten, R. (2011). Art & agenda: Political art and activism. Berlin: Die Gestalten Verlag.
Kovalenko, О. (2012). Pomarancheva alternatyva: Mystetstvo u politytsi [The Orange Alternative: Art in politics]. Yevropeiskyi Svit, 6, рp. 32-54.
Kutsepal, S. (2015). Sotsium spektakliu: mozaika modelei [The society of the spectacle: mosaic of the models]. In S. Terepyshchyi, O. Yaremchuk, R. Kordonskyi and K. Syhidus (Eds.), Transformatsiini protsesy suchasnoho suspilstva [Transformational processes of modern society] (pp. 141-147). Kyiv: M. P. Drahomanov National Pedagogical University Press.
Marinenko, Y. (2016). Kazus Pussy Riot kak yavleniye performativnogo akta [The case of Pussy Riot as a performative act]. Voprosy istorii, mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i dokumentovedeniya, 12 (1), рp. 234-238.
Mesch, C. (2000). Art and politics: A small history of art for social change since 1945. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
Naumkina, S. M. and Gruieva, O. V. (2016). Politychnyi hepening u systemi aktsionistskykh form politychnoi aktyvnosti [Political happening within the system of actionist forms of political activism]. Visnyk Donetskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu, 1, pp. 86-91.
Olshansky, D. V. (2003). Politicheskiy PR [Political PR]. St. Petersburg: Piter.
Stanislavska, K. I. (2016). Mystetsko-vydovyshchni formy suchasnoi kultury [Art and entertainment forms of modern culture]. Kyiv: National Academy of Culture and Arts Management.
Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (1984). Social movements and national politics. In C. Bright and S. Harding (Eds.), State-making and social movements: Essays in history and theory (pp. 297-317). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Traugott, M. (Ed.) (1995). Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham: Duke University Press.
Uzzi, B. and Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111 (2), pp. 447-504. doi: 10.1086/432782.
Vail, J. and Hollands, R. (2013). Creative democracy and the arts: The participatory democracy of the Amber Collective. Cultural Sociology, 7 (3), рp. 352-367. doi: 10.1177/1749975513480958.
Vujanović, A. and Piazza, L. (Eds.) (2019). A live gathering: Performance and politics in contemporary Europe. Berlin: B_Books.