Efficacy and speed of action of selected plant protection products on Lymantria dispar in laboratory conditions


Published: Jan 8, 2009
Keywords:
Lymantria dispar methoxyfenozide spinosad Bacillus thuringiensis Insect Growth Regulators
Z.D. Zartaloudis
M.D. Kalapanida
E.I. Navrozidis
Abstract
In this study some selected insecticides were evaluated for their effect on gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L., (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) under laboratory conditions. Diflubenzuron, methoxyfenozide, triflumuron, fenoxycarb, fenoxycarb + lufenuron, Bacillus thuringiensis 50% subsp. kurstaki + Bacillus thuringiensis 50% subsp. aizawai, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai and spinosad were used in the recommended concentration, against the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th larval instars of L. dispar. The effectiveness of the above insecticides as well as the speed of action (LTime50 and LTime90) expressed in days, were examined in detail. Spinosad and methoxyfenozide presents a relatively higher speed of action in relation to the other insecticides. LTime50 of spinosad and methoxyfenozide did not differ significantly among the first three larval instars and ranged from 0 to 0.61 and 1.13 to 1.74 days, respectively. Regarding IGRs, the mixture (fenoxycarb + lufenuron) and triflumuron were the most effective in relation to the other IGRs tested. Moreover, Bacillus thuringiensis toxins were effective only against the first two larval instars.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Angus, T.A. 1968. Similarity of effect of valinomycin and Bacillus thuringiensis parasporal protein in larvae of Bombyx mori. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 11: 145-146.
Berrada, S. and T.X. Nguyen. 1994. Resistance du psylle du Poirier a un organophosphore, le monocrotophos. International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants (IOBC) West Palaearctic Regional Section (Wprs) Bulletin, 17: 34-36.
Biddinger, D.J., L.A. Hull and E.G. Rajotte. 1998. Stage specificity of various insecticides to Tufted Apple Bud Moth larvae (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 200-208.
Charmillot, P.J. 1989. Les regulateurs de croissance d'insectes (RCI), mimiques de l'hormone juvenile, entant que moyen de lutte morphoge ne tique et ovicide contre les tordeuses des vergers. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 51: 59-69.
Charmillot, P.J., A. Gourmelon, A.L. Fabre and D. Pasquier. 2001. Ovicidal and larvicidal effectiveness of several insect growth inhibitors and regulators on the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lep., Tortricidae). J. Appl. Ent. 125: 147-153.
Dorn, S., M.L. Frischknecht, V. Martinez, H.R. Zurfluè and U. Fischer. 1981. A novel non neurotoxic insecticide with a broad activity spectrum. Zeitschr. P. Krankh. P Schutz 88: 269-275.
Finney, D.J. 1952. Probit analysis. Cambrigde, University press, UK.
Grijpma, P.J. 1989. Overview of research on Lymantrids in Eastern and Western Europe. In W.E. Wallner and K.A. McManus [Eds.] A Comparison of features of new and old World tussock moths, U.S.D.A, Forest Service, Northeast Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report NE-123, pp. 21-49.
Leonard, D.E. 1981. Bioecology of the gypsy moth. In C.C. Doane and M.L. McManus [Eds.] The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management, USDA Tech. Bull., Washington, U.S.A., pp. 9-29.
Markalas, S. and Μ. Kalapanida. 1999. Variability in the appearance and the duration of the growth stages of Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). In Proceedings, 7th National Entomological Congress, 21 – 24 October 1997. Ed. by Greek Entomological Society, Kavala, Greece, pp. 56-63.
Matthews, G.A. 1997. Techniques to evaluate insecticide efficacy. In D.R. Dent and M.P. Walton [Eds.] Methods in Ecological and Agricultural Entomology, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 243-270.
Peacock, J.W., D.F. Schweitzer, J.L. Carter, and N.R. Dubois. 1998. Laboratory assessment of the effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on native Lepidoptera. Environ. Entomol. 27: 450-457.
Schweitzer, D.F. 2004. Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar): Impacts and Options for Biodiversity-Oriented Land Managers. NatureServe: Arlington, Virginia. 59 pp.
Salgado, V., G.B. Watson and J.J. Sheets. 1997. Studies on the mode of action of spinosad, the active ingredient in Tracer Insect Control. In: Proceedings, Beliwide Cotton Production Conference, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, USA, pp. 1082-1086.
Sample, B.E., L. Butler, C. Zivkovich, R.C. Whitmore and R. Reardon. 1996. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. kurstaki and defoliation by the gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)] on native arthropods in West Virginia. Can. Entomol. 128:573-592.
Severns, P. 2002. Evidence for the negative effects of BT (Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki) on a nontarget butterfly community in western Oregon, USA. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 56: 166-170.
Throne, E.J., D.K. Weaver, V. Chew and J.B. Baker. 1995. Probit analysis of correlated data: Multiple observations over time at one concentration. J. Econ. Entomol. 88: 1510-1512.
Wagner, D.L., J.W. Peacock, J.L. Carter and S.E. Talley. 1996. Field assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis on nontarget Lepidoptera. Environ. Entomol. 25: 1444-1454.
Ware, G.W. and D.M. Whitacre. 2004. Modes of Action for Insecticides pp187- 203. In: The Pesticide Book, 6th edition.
Meister Media Worldwide, Willoughby, Ohio. 496pp