Reference rot degrades information preservation and induces the loss of intellectual integrity
Abstract
The age of open access has ushered in a greater desire to cross-cite information from a multitude of sources, some of which may have a determined fate and life cycle. Information insecurity caused by the loss or transposition of information also negatively impacts information integrity by reducing its use and usefulness. Reference rot refers to the phenomenon in which the link to a web resource or journal article URL no longer function, revealing instead a “404 not found” error message. Reference rot can reduce the reliability and usefulness of a manuscript because access to information supporting claims and/or positions within a paper ceases to exist. Academic papers carry a complex mixture of information that is derived from a multitude of sources. Collectively, they ensure a paper’s health and functionality, aspects that fade as access to supporting information becomes truncated, i.e., reference rot, ultimately reducing the usefulness of the academic paper, and making it, and its claims, unreliable. Although it is a cumbersome task, as the curators of academic and scientific information, extant journals and their editors should revisit URLs in the reference lists regularly to update any broken links or URLs, and correct reference lists accordingly. This laborious task should involve close coordination between editors and authors to ensure, as best as possible, the sustained integrity of citations and thus the information backbone of a manuscript. An academic paper with a strong, or fortified, citation base, has greater information integrity, reliability and use for science and society.
Article Details
- Zitationsvorschlag
-
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Reference rot degrades information preservation and induces the loss of intellectual integrity. Epistēmēs Metron Logos, (6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.12681/eml.25792
- Rubrik
- Publishing partner
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Literaturhinweise
Al-Khatib, A., Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2017). Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model. Publishing Research Quarterly 33(1): 64–70. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9486-z
Björk, BC. (2017). Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access. Electronic Markets 27(2): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0249-2
Burgelman, J-C., Pascu, C., Szkuta, K., Von Schomberg, R., Karalopoulos, A., Repanas, K., Schouppe, M. (2019). Open science, open data, and open scholarship: European policies to make science fit for the twenty-first century. Frontiers in Big Data 2: 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
Burnhill, P., Mewissen, M., Wincewicz, R. (2015). Reference rot in scholarly statement: threat and remedy. Insights 28(2): 55–61. http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.237
Chatzikokolakis, K. (2018). On the additive capacity problem for quantitative information flow. In: McIver A., Horvath A. (eds) Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. QEST 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11024. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99154-2_1
Clarkson, M., Schneider, F. (2015). Quantification of integrity. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 25(2): 207–258. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129513000595
Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24(1): 1–2. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
Giblin, J., Stefaniak, J., Eckhoff, A., Luo, T. (2020). An exploration of factors influencing the decision-making process and selection of academic help sources. Journal of Computing in Higher Education (in press) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09252-0
Hedin D., Sjösten A., Piessens F., Sabelfeld A. (2017). A principled approach to tracking information flow in the presence of libraries. In: Maffei M., Ryan M. (eds) Principles of Security and Trust. POST 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10204. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54455-6_3
Hewitt, M., Dingwall, R., Turkmendag, I. (2017). Squeeze on academics poses threats to learned societies. Research Fortnight 28 June 2017: 23–23. https://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/239545
Hiemstra, D., Moens, M.F., Perego, R., Sebastiani, F. (2020). Transitioning the information retrieval literature to a fully open access model. ACM SIGIR Forum 54(1): 1–10. http://sigir.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/p15.pdf
Holbrook, J.B. (2019). Open science, open access, and the democratization of knowledge. Issues in Science and Technology 35(3): 26–28. https://issues.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Holbrook-Philosophers-Corner-SP19-ISSUES-26-28.pdf
Hyland, K., Jiang, F.K. (2019). Points of reference: changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics 40(1): 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx012
Khoo, S.Y.-S. (2019). Article processing charge hyperinflation and price insensitivity: an open access sequel to the serials crisis. LIBER Quarterly 29(1): 1–18. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10280
Kirchhoff, A.J. (2008). Digital preservation: challenges and implementation. Learned Publishing 21(4): 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X356716
Klein, M., Van de Sompel, H., Sanderson, R., Shankar, H., Balakireva, L., Zhou, K., Tobin, R. (2014). Scholarly context not found: one in five articles suffers from reference rot. PLoS ONE 9(12): e115253. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115253
Laakso, M., Mathias, L., Jahn, N. (2020). Open is not forever: a study of vanished open access journals. Arxiv (preprint, not peer reviewed, version 3): 1–32. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11933
Lorenz, S. (2017). Ecological criticism of growth and the means and ends of technology. A pragmatist perspective on societal dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production 166: 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.008
Lynch, C. (2017). Updating the agenda for academic libraries and scholarly communications. College & Research Libraries 78(2): 126–130. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.2.126
Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K. (2015). Do younger researchers assess trustworthiness differently when deciding what to read and cite and where to publish? International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology 5(2): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2015.5.2.045
O’Connor, C., O’Connor, A.E. (2015). 'Reference rot': A developing problem in Emergency Medicine Australasia. Emergency Medicine Australasia 27(5): 494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12459
O’Connor, C., O’Connor, A.E. (2018). Reference rot in medical publications. Irish Medical Journal 111(9): 827. PMID 30556675
Orben, A. (2020). The Sisyphean cycle of technology panics. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15(5): 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620919372
Riss P. (2015). "Reference rot": does it matter? International Urogynecology Journal 26(9): 1251–1252. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2707-8
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Johnston, W.A. (2019). Redefining science: the impact of complexity on theory development in social and behavioral research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 14(4): 672–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619848688
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2020a). Three new suggested guidelines for increased transparency regarding open access article processing charges (APCs). Epistēmēs Metron Logos 4: 4–7. https://doi.org/10.12681/eml.24208
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2020b). Misinformation in COVID-19 media and literature, with an emphasis on open data policies. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education 7(2): 25–29. http://www.kadint.net/journals_n/1611170173.pdf
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2020c). Is there a need for creators of imaginary authors to face legal consequences? Croatian Medical Journal 61(6): 561–563. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2020.61.561
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2021). Paper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 77(1): 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.003
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J. (2018). Editors moving forward: stick to academic basics, maximize transparency and respect, and enforce the rules. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 109(5): 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1701/2902.29244
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J., Tsigaris, P., Al-Khatib, A. (2019). Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 45(6): 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071
Trapp, J. (2020). Predatory publishing, hijacking of legitimate journals and impersonation of researchers via special issue announcements: a warning for editors and authors about a new scam. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 43(1): 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00835-5
van Rooij, I. Baggio, G. (2020). Theory development requires an epistemological sea change. Psychological Inquiry 31(4): 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1853477
